Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman
This is an obvious misinterpretation of a slide referring to 470. That is his own fault and indeed a mistake, but when it comes to 470, that info seems nearly spot on wouldn't you say?
Yeah it's pretty much spot on, except that the lower high end Fermi would have 448SP was pretty much common knowledge anyway, and after all he was mistaken.

Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman
written in February 20, 2010, early tests, early drivers, obviously performance will be better. And quite plausible that a chip with 512 shaders will not pull much higher clocks than the 625 Mhz from its 470 sibling, not unless it will push 300W.
Meh. So we can talk about numbers for an unfinished product like they will belong to the finished product? That way several months ago he could have written an article and say "wow there is no Fermi at the moment so there will never be any Fermi's". This is now how journalism works.


He claims you will be able to GET midrange Fermi in summer, but you will be able to get GF100 before that, just not in "quantities" which in Charlie language, means full availability.
His statement claims: low availability of GF100 until Q4, launch of midrange Fermi in summer. Full availability of both only in Q4.
His statement clearly says that this summer time will be "much sooner" than real GF100 availability, which means pretty much what I have said before.