Quote Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
OK..got it.

You just compare with Sampsa thread and SF3D thread CPUZ and one guy post 945 AM3 CPUz.


So this cpu is "early 945 AM3 ES" or "early 940 AM2+ ES"? I believe SF3D didn't know that. I am so mad because I must follow with ing NDA and some guys can post it.

If SF3D said that it was 940 ES(AM2+) than I have no reason to think otherwise.
As for the other dude's thread(user cdawall),his chip is probably not recognized properly.IN any case,Sampsa or SF3D didn't brake anything,they just used the same CPUs they did back in Chicago event,like they mentioned countless times.
But there is no need for me to defend them,since there is nothing to defend and they can speak for themselves(like they do).It's all straight forward...