Results 1 to 25 of 272

Thread: Enzotech-LUNA CPU waterblock

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    78
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterlogged View Post
    Please show me where I stated that I tested the Luna? I don't not have, nor will I be getting a Luna. Until this post, you have not directed a single question at me, they were all aimed at mcoffey.



    Did you see the video in the link at the bottom of page 7? Is there something wrong with my testing methodology?



    Thanks for thinking I'm stupid. I know what a Hall Effect sensor is as I had one on an after market GM ignition system I purchased for my Buick V6 back in the early 90's.

    Perfect?...How can you say running a DDC3.2 @ 75% of full power is a perfect test? The GTZ needs lots of pressure (second only to the Supreme for current gen blocks) to function properly, you will only get that pressure running at full power. The Luna also has 3 inserts that can choose to use or leave out thereby adjusting the restrictiveness of the block. The fact that the RPM's don't match or are even close in the tests is a clear indicator that something is amiss. Anyone that has seen the results and testing methodology of a valid test will say that this test is far from a valid test, the numbers just don't add up.


    Nice doing business with y'all, y'all come back again now, ya hear.
    And the pissing match begins.

    I'm sorry sir but you are wrong. Not on your observation of the pump power bur rather your inability to comprehend that the lower RPMs are accounted for by the higher restriction. The more restriction the more pressure is applied on the pump. It's quite obvious and even your post above states that the GTZ needs more head pressure in order to perform it's best (only second to the EK Supreme).

    Now let's look at this logically. If the RPMs are lower when the GTZ is in use yet the power pushed to the pump is the same than one can conclude that the restriction of the GTZ is likely responsible for the lower RPMs.

    One would likely not see this in a single block loop but Malik is using multiple blocks and some of them (Bitspower) tend to be highly restrictive.

    MCoffey stated this: "Well around here, if you're good and kind enough to share your results, then you're good and kind enough to answer questions or debate the results. I don't believe anyone called anyone a liar. WL ran his own pump test and came up with a different result than Malik, so he posted his question because the two results differ."

    So which one of you two tested this block with a similar pump? He says you did and you say he did.

    ?!
    Last edited by ElMoIsEviL; 01-17-2009 at 11:08 AM.
    Intel Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.4Ghz (HT on) | eVGA X58 Classified Hydro | 6x 2GB Corsair XMS3 Dominator GT PC3-2000 DDR3 RAM | ATi Radeon HD 5970 2GB Graphics Card | ATi Radeon HD 5870 1GB Graphics Card for Tri-Fire | eVGA 9800GT 512MB PhysX Card | Intel Pro/1000 CT NIC | Auzentech Forte 7.1 Audio | 2x Intel X25-M 80GB SSD RAID0 | 1TB Seagate 7200.11 7.2K RPM HD | LG GBW-H20L BLU-RAY | Antec Quattro 1000W PSU | Watercooled Silverstone TJ09-BW Case

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •