-
Thermaltake DuOrb vs Zalman VF900-CU (lots of pics)



The test is very simple,i just had to stress the card for about 6mins and the results are very impressive 
Stock HSF

Stock HSF fan @ 50%
Idle : 52º C
Load : 74º C


Stock HSF fan @ 100%
Idle : 45º C
Load : 70º C


Zalman VF900-CU

Zalman Vf900-CU fan @ 1350rpm
Idle : 39º C
Load : 57º C


Zalman Vf900-CU fan @ 2400rpm
Idle : 38º C
Load : 50º C


Thermaltake DuOrb

Idle : 34º C
Load : 41º C


Thermaltake vs Zalman
VF900-CU It's quiet, quality, easy to install and performs well ,The VF900 is really small especially when compared to the DuOrb, which is about twice as heavy and twice large,well... the Zalman is no contest for the Thermaltake,there s about a 9C difference between them, ,if it's performance that you want, get the Thermaltake 
pics










VGA->X1950Pro 512mb
Room temp->25C-26C
Last edited by PcCI2iminal; 09-23-2007 at 05:56 AM.
Mojo
Family
Biostar TP55 XE - Core i7 860(ES) @ 4.2ghz - CNPS10X Extreme - G.SKILL 1600 - Galaxy GTX275 - Velociraptor 300GB x 2 - Zippy TypeR 600w
Criminal
Biostar Tpower X58A - 920~Gulf - G.SKILL2000CL8 - GTX580 - Intel 520 120GB - Antec HCP 1200w
Biostar TP67XE/TZ77XE4 2500k~3770K - G.SKILL 2800 - GTX480 - OCZ Vertex2 50GB - Corsair AX1200
Biostar Tpower X79 i7 3820 ~ E5 2680 - G.SKILL 2400C11 - GTX560Ti - Intel 520 120GB - AX1200i
Kids
P4GD1 - Pentium M 780 - XMS Xpert400 - GTX460 - Raptor 36GB - Aopen 560w

Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks