Xtreme Low Q6600 G0 Temp on Air !!! (Lots of Pics)

[XtremeTiramisu]

I thought VID was supposed to be like the stock voltage.

Mine says 1.2625 in coretemp but I'm using 32bit XP, not sure if that makes a diff.

Okay, so 1.425 didn't work for your 3.6ghz? I'll have to see when I get home.

L723A930



VID say's 1.3, what does that mean?

vcore set in bios about 1.55

To be 3.6 stable vcore was 1.45

Regarding chip's VID:

This is what I've answered in another forum for someone who asked the same questions on VID:
VID is also one thing that we can take into account to determine the chip's overclocking-ability in the later stages. Lower VID almost always means that the overclocking room will be more. Bcos you started off with a lower Vcore at stock clock, your chip may ended up requiring much less volts to acheive the desire clock than another chip that has a higher VID than yours at the same clock. Lower volts required to obtain your desired clock speed may also mean lower temp.

However, keep this in mind though, although I'm stating this all based on facts and statistics but this still doesn't guarantee the OC outcome in every case, just so you know

Told you you'd have better luck with the 9x multi

3.74 GHz on air is nothing short of amazing!

Wonder what it'd do on better cooling...

Gotta say thanks for enlighten me
I totally forgot about the x9 multiplier route as I was so used to x8 multiplier route with my E6700.

If you are still in a room that is in the 25 - 29C ambient range, if I was you I would not trust these temps. Your "system" temp and your "HD0" temp are at or below ambient.

If it was me I would install XP and see if the temp readings stay where they are. I am not trying to say you are cheating, just that maybe the 64 bit OS is not compatible with the temp monitoring proggies. If I am right you may well be burning up your CPU without even knowing it. Of course there is always the 99% chance that I am wrong, in which case...NICE!!!

I still don't trust those temps. Like I said if it was me I would check it out in XP just to be sure. I realize this screenie was taken in morning, but he has others in afternoon with same low HD and system temp.

This post
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...9&postcount=11
says his ambient temps go from 21 - 30++. Even 24C HD and 25C system at 21C ambient is kinda weird. Just hoping he is not burning his chip up due to a temp monitor on 64 bit OS that isn't proper, but maybe I am just paranoid.

OK, here is another explanation I'm going to make again just so you're clear about the core temp reported from Coretemp and Speedfan4.32.

Obviously you've not being reading and following my every single post carefully throughout the 7 pages, and I understand the thread is long but the infos are all there actually.

1. Forget about Vista 32bit or 64bit vs XP OS enviroment for reading the core temp correct, let me tell you simply that the OS isn't not related to the accuracy of the core temp reporting. I think I've answered about the accuracy part to someone in one of the post reply I made from the previous pages. Tjunction - DTS = coretemp and I even had a screen per the demand asking to show the Tjunction remaining from the coretemp just to show that the core temp is actually picking up the 100c Tjunction properly.

2. Pay close attention again to all my screen captures that has Asus AI suite and Speedfan 4.32 in it and look for the time for the screen that was captured. You can see that the system temp varies throughout the day. My room temp is actually 4~5c lower than the system temp reported. Do the calculations yourself and you'll find out my approx ambient temp. It's very similar to any others who also has Asus AI suite + speedfan 4.32 in the screen shots. However everyone's room conditions are different.

And obviously again you've missed the post I've made regarding the relationship btw ambient temp and OC'ed core temps in my previous page. Go dig it up and read it again.

People please don't make me explain things again for something it's already being covered. I have every motivation to show and explain all OC related subjects as clear and legit as possible so I'd hope you call can get it in the first place so no more time will be wasted from both party.

hey XtremeTiramisu is then any way you can show some 3DMark06 benchmark

Of course, this is also one of my primary goal after I'm fully settled on a max stable clock speed : voltage : core temp strictly below Intel thermal spec of 71c on air cooling setup.

Yeah I was thinking the same thing. He should try to get coretemp working.

Obviously you've not being following my posts closely enough and have missed the fact that I even made a post reply to help all others who need to get Coretemp 0.95 to work under Vista x64 OS in the previous pages.