Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 84

Thread: Another Redline death?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    804

    Another Redline death?

    Very odd thing happened, when i went to tweak some timings on 2*512 of redline, rebooted and the whole system powered off, i hadnt realised i left voltage low and clocked too high. So i restarted and heard the long beeps, checked the leds and was saying ram. Now i can only boot one stick in slot 1 (yellow furthest from cpu) and any other wont. Also the second stick wont boot at all, on its own or in dual/single with the other. Anyone had anything like this. Looks like another mushkin rma coming up.
    amd 3500+ claw
    dfi nf4 ultra-D
    2*512 muchkin 4000 redline
    ocz 520 powerstream.

  2. #2
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Tried clearing CMOS?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    804
    Yes, cleared cmos etc, had to stick in some other ram to set voltages to normal (well.........for redline) and still no go, all other settings @ auto in bios so stock timings.

  4. #4
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Def sounds like they died...weird.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    324
    Well if I was you I would leave the stick somewhere cool for 24 hours, then reflash the bios to 510-2 615 618-2 623-2.

    Or load default settting with good stick enter bios up Vdimm, Load into windows then shut down. Dont unplug power cord put the other stick in see if it boots.

    I have a strong feeling that 90% of so called dead sticks is infact the board ie "so called cold boot"
    DFI Ultra-D
    X2 3800 Toledo 290x10 (1.39v) (not tweaked yet)
    2x 1GB Ballistix
    Sapphire X1950 256
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.9
    OCZPowerstream 520
    Custom water cooled

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    512
    So these DFI NF4s are killing UTT with lower voltage now....lol
    Opteron 170 @ 3.0Ghz on air, Opteron 144 @ 3.1Ghz on air

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by TMM
    So these DFI NF4s are killing UTT with lower voltage now....lol
    IF UTT DRAM die with low voltage on DFI NF4 , apparently it's not the board kill the dram because the board will never supply high voltage dram ... It's the UTT casue the root problem ... No matter what kind of UTT chip is used , these UTT module failure rate is much higher than pre-tested chip !!!

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    936
    I don't believe that 95% of the cases here are dead sticks, just board voltage issues.
    ALIENS are bringing my next kentsfield based rig in a UFO case!

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by fareastgq
    I don't believe that 95% of the cases here are dead sticks, just board voltage issues.
    Most of them have cold boot problem first , and need more and more voltage to boot up after several weeks ... And finally they die ... I don't believe it's the board voltage problem ...

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    632
    You have to boot up your DFI with some good old generic ram. Then once you get a post set your timmings again and save your cmos. Then put your redlines back in and they will work
    Tba

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    512
    Quote Originally Posted by wtz54321
    IF UTT DRAM die with low voltage on DFI NF4 , apparently it's not the board kill the dram because the board will never supply high voltage dram ... It's the UTT casue the root problem ... No matter what kind of UTT chip is used , these UTT module failure rate is much higher than pre-tested chip !!!
    that is true, but hardly any people are "killing" the UTT on boards other then the DFI NF4s :s - which leads me to think that it's something more then just voltage
    Opteron 170 @ 3.0Ghz on air, Opteron 144 @ 3.1Ghz on air

  12. #12
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    I think it's the unstable voltage the DFIs have at the 4V setting, probably am wrong though.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,692
    swap the stick around and boot again.
    Core i7 920 D0 3844A717 4.40Ghz HT on @1.36v (LinX/Prime/3D stable), Corsair 850W, 12GB OCZ Platinum 1600, P6T Deluxe V2, EVGA GTX 285 SS, OCZ Vortex SSD 30GB x3 RAID0, HAF 932.
    Water Cooling Setup: XSPC RX360, MCP355 + XSPC Res Top, Swiftech GTZ, 1/2" Tygon, Scythe S-Flex SFF21F push, 20mm yateloon D12SL-12C pull.


    Opteron 148 CABNE 0528 GPMW 3.1Ghz @1.6v Prime Stable. Westy 37" LVM-37W3, DFI Venus 975, 2GB TeamX Cronus Micron, GSkill HZ, Sapphire X1900XTX, Zippy 700W, X-Fi Xtrememusic, 36GB Raptors x2 @Raid-0.
    WC Setup: PA120.3 +Shroud, MCP655, STORM, MCW60, 1/2" Tygon, mini res, Yate Loon.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    804
    Ive tried every single possible placement for the 2 sticks together and all 4 for each stick, only one stick will boot in one slot. I was running @3.2volts at the time and ive never used the 4v jumper, ive always jacked up my 3.3v line and run off that.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    169
    Do the Redline death phenomenon happens on DFI NF4 boards which were 4V/5V "jumpered"? Let's say that if I had a MSI K8N Neo2 or DFI NF4 @ 3V, I'm safe?

    I would like to know this before I buy my Redline's.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by TMM
    that is true, but hardly any people are "killing" the UTT on boards other then the DFI NF4s :s - which leads me to think that it's something more then just voltage
    Absoultely not true ... How many board out there has VDIMM higher than 2.9V when they are out of the factory ? MSI , No ... ASUS , No ... Gigabyte , No ... ABIT , no , until the V2.0 of AN8 and SLI version has 3.55V build in ... A lof of the users here use DFI NF4 board to overclock and the board is one of few board with VDIMM higher than 2.9V without mod ... That's the main reason you see most of the DIMM dead on this board ... But it does not mean that the board kill the DRAM ... If the board supply unstable voltage to kill the board using 4V jumper , there won't be any DRAM dead with 4V jumper set in 3.3V mode ... And there will be many old BH5/CH5 dead case here ... But most of the dead case is UTT DRAM , and these dram die on other board with DRAM voltage no higher than 3.3V ... It's almost impossible that the board is the only reason to kill these memory !!! The problem of the root cause is UTT DRAM , not what kind of UTT DRAM chip is used on the module !!! That's why these chip is called UTT chip and much cheaper when the module maker buy these chip !!! Unless the module maker can show us some evidence that how they proceed their burn in process to find out those quickly failure chip among all these UTT DRAM chip they buy , I don't believe all these UTT DRAM will not die even with 2.5V in any board ...

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by Vincentvega18
    Ive tried every single possible placement for the 2 sticks together and all 4 for each stick, only one stick will boot in one slot. I was running @3.2volts at the time and ive never used the 4v jumper, ive always jacked up my 3.3v line and run off that.
    As I said before ... The root cause is not the voltage or the board ... These dead module contain those bad chip that will fail quickly among all the UTT DRAM chip ... You apply high voltage and accelerate the burn in time before the dram fail ... But it's not the voltage or the board kill the dram ... It's the DRAM itself is not a good one , which should be sorting out in general IC testing process ... But now they are UTT chip , and these chips are not sorting out before they put on the module ... Unless these module maker can show us some evidence how they do the burn in process to find out these quickly fail chip ... I believe the actually root cause of these dead module is UTT problem , not the board , and not the voltage ...

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    324
    Used to agree with this, until I started getting cold boot problems and aparently completly dead sticks, boot screen hanging on mother board.
    Vdimm voltages wrong @ start up Vcore voltages the same. Then flashing a bios makes the completly dead stick work again. I suggest the issue is much more to do with the board than you/some think. I also suspect alot of so called dead sticks will work on other boards, or bios
    DFI Ultra-D
    X2 3800 Toledo 290x10 (1.39v) (not tweaked yet)
    2x 1GB Ballistix
    Sapphire X1950 256
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.9
    OCZPowerstream 520
    Custom water cooled

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    632
    I hate mushkin, The GSKILL GH UTT RAM is confirmed by DUMO that the cold boot issue is not a problem with those sticks
    Tba

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,501
    Sadly one of my redlines dies this morning Bah, looks like it's time to RMA...

  21. #21
    -100c Club Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Riverside, California
    Posts
    4,740
    Defend the DFI mobo, we must.
    Have you come to realize we haven't heard people complaining about dead UTT (OCZ Plat Rev.2) with DDR booster much at all compared to whats been going on? Noticed how there are no report of major issue on NF3 setups despite to fact popularness of UTT from that time frame? (anyone using UTT with less than 3.2v? hello?)
    But all logics shall fail and we shall defend DFI...
    I will present my case to you again.
    How can 4 sticks of UTT die at exact same time if it is bad memory? Did I just get 4 mushkin blue that are bad which decided to die together at exact time? Let's see... what are the chances....
    [SIGPIC]http://www.vapoli.com/Images/Forum/vapoli.jpg[/SIGPIC]

    Single Stage Work Logs

    Quote Originally Posted by killermiller View Post
    Those ccb's will die if you look at them wrong.

    heatware: jinu117

  22. #22
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Fortress of solitude, VA, USA
    Posts
    92
    With all these redline deaths, can anybody comment on the easy/difficulty of Mushkin RMA's?



    Opteron 144 CAB2E 0546 UPMW . XP-120 HS . Panaflo 120mm L1A . DFI Lanparty NF4 Ultra-D . 2 GB (2x1GB) OCZ EL PC4000 XTC @ 3-4-3-8
    Connect3D x850 xt pe . Dell 1901FP . Seasonic S12 600W . Antec SX1040B

    A64 3000+ Venice 0521BPKW . XP-120 HS . Panaflo 120mm L1A . DFI Lanparty NF4 Ultra-D . 1 GB (2x512) OCZ PC3700EB @ 3-3-2-8
    Connect3D x850 xt pe . Dell 1901FP . Seasonic S12 600W . Antec SX1040B

    my heatware: 75-0-0


  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,501
    I'm going to find out today... i was overvolting them, but why did only one die?

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by jiff
    Used to agree with this, until I started getting cold boot problems and aparently completly dead sticks, boot screen hanging on mother board.
    Vdimm voltages wrong @ start up Vcore voltages the same. Then flashing a bios makes the completly dead stick work again. I suggest the issue is much more to do with the board than you/some think. I also suspect alot of so called dead sticks will work on other boards, or bios
    I really don't know how you think it's the BIOS PROBLEM ... The new beta bios did solve the cold boot problem , but that's because the bios will program high dram voltage to boot up these " DEAD " stcik ... That does not mean that the DRAM is working as normal one ... You must be able to use the DRAM when you first get these module , and the DRAM must be able to boot at 2.6V ... But after several weeks of operation , these so called dead stick need more and more bootup voltage , apparently these module start to act strange , and the dram characteristic is far from normal one ... The bios is the workaround , but it's not the bios solve the dram not able to work @ 2.6V ... Since there are many dead stick die only with 3.2V or so with 3.3V jumper location , it's not the voltage kill these dram ... It's these dram chip are actually " Fail Quickly " ones ... These chip should already been sorting out before they put on the module , but the UTT chip did not have this process ... And the testing cost is saved , that's why the UTT chip is cheap when they ship to module maker !!!

  25. #25
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by jinu117
    Defend the DFI mobo, we must.
    Have you come to realize we haven't heard people complaining about dead UTT (OCZ Plat Rev.2) with DDR booster much at all compared to whats been going on? Noticed how there are no report of major issue on NF3 setups despite to fact popularness of UTT from that time frame? (anyone using UTT with less than 3.2v? hello?)
    But all logics shall fail and we shall defend DFI...
    I will present my case to you again.
    How can 4 sticks of UTT die at exact same time if it is bad memory? Did I just get 4 mushkin blue that are bad which decided to die together at exact time? Let's see... what are the chances....
    No , we should not defend DFI mobo ... If it's the board that supply wrong voltage to kill the DRAM , and the UTT chip is the victim ... Why should anybody defend DFI mobo ? But we are trying to find out the truth ... And I have already collect enough information to tell you it's not the board or the voltage to kill the DRAM ... It's the UTT DRAM problem ... Not the CH5 problem ... Once the module is made from UTT chip , no matter these UTT chip is made from winbond , samgsung , or any other company ... The failure rate of these module is much higher than " Pre-Tested chip " made module !!! It's not possible for the module maker to avoid the typical UTT problem unless they can do the same thing as IC testing company to find out those " fail quickly chip " ... I don't know if OCZ or mushkin can show us some picture of their burn in process of how to find out these " fail quickly chip " ... If they can provide us some information about this , we can find more and more possible reason how these dram module are dead !!!

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •