@MaddMuppet: It shows my impatience.
Bit more details on Mantle below. Are there any slide dumps somewhere, or anyone who at least took a photo of every slide? Right click open in new tab to enlarge if it's too small.
![]()
Open to everyone and with linux version released and steamos..m we are looking to the future. Very very well done.
Sent from my SM-N9000Q using Tapatalk
When i'm being paid i always do my job through.
That paves the way for battlefield linuxI am excite!
Xeon E3-1245 @ Stock | Gigabyte H87N-Wifi | 16GB Crucial Ballistix LP @ 1600Mhz | R7 260x | Much and varied storage
^^^ I thought Magadascar the movie already had battle penguins...
この世界には 人の運命を司る 何らかの超越的な 〝律〝...... 〝神の手〝が 存在するのだろうか? 少なくとも 人は 自らの意志さえ 自由にはできな
http://www.hardware.fr/news/13450/ap...ec-mantle.html
And here I thought nobody is willing to post the slides. Yes!
Seems like Oxide mentioned strategy games. I'd love to see > 1000 unit limit without any lag.
Oxide is praising Mantle to cloud 9 it seems. Quite hoping to see a game use their engine soon, but that's unlikely.
EDIT: I'm wrong. Their demo, StarSwarm is coming Q1 2014, seems to feature 2 AIs, over 20k units ('100k batch', just interpolating them saying 10k units ~ 50k batch) fighting each other out.
EDIT2: 3 times faster, but I got no clue what they're comparing it to. I think Mantle is going to be a huge boon to strategy games. AMD FX 8350 downclocked to 2 GHz is still not CPU-bound apparently.
Last edited by blindbox; 11-13-2013 at 10:13 PM.
Couple of things about those tweets.
1. https://twitter.com/repi/status/4008...485696/photo/1 If oxide can now have 100k draw calls with mantel, how many draw call they are getting with dx11.1?
2. "Oxide wants to see 300k batches by 2015, 1 million by 2018." What does this mean?
3. I guess AMD hit the jackpot with mantel, now being able to compete intel with it's inferior CPU. Has this been AMD's plan all along when they desided to cut down those FPU units? Hard to believe, but then again, it's also hard to believe that AMD would magically get this lucky when thinking about gaming and their slow CPU's. Too bad this mantle wont help AMD CPU's in real world applications.
4. Just speculations for the future. Shouldn't excavator embedded even more CPU and GPU making FPU's in CPU's even more legacy compute units?
So, Mantle API ---> extensions ---> GPU mArch, it's not locked to GCN only, not even AMD only. And it can be used continuously as GPU mArch evolved, as long the extensions are developed. Correct ? If that so, BRAVO AMD !![]()
Rig:
Intel Core 2 Quad 9400 @4.0 GHz watercooled
AMD Radeon HD 5850 @950 MHz
4 GB Adata Vitesta
DFI LanParty X38
Creative XFi
2 WDC black 640 GB RAID 0, 2 WDC caviar 1.5 GB
Silverstone 700 w
Thermaltake Kandalf
24" Samsung LCD TV full HD
From: http://www.hardware.fr/news/13450/ap...ec-mantle.html
1. 15k
2. What is this 'batch' you can see on the 1st photo there:
http://www.hardware.fr/medias/photos...G0043524_1.jpg
Last edited by cezar; 11-14-2013 at 12:36 AM.
FX-8320 + Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 + 16GB Crucial Elite 1866 CL9
but from what I understand with mantle the CPU's performance won't be so much of an issue. It seems they want to take a ton of the load off of the CPU? Intel has had free reign with the top performance in desktop sector for years now. I'm not saying it's good but I don't think it will get much worse in terms of year to year performance gains. just my opinion.
CPU: i5 3570k @ 4.2 Ghz
Memory: 2x4gb Kingston HyperX @ 1600Mhz
Graphics: Sapphire 6950 Toxic on BenQ XL2420TE
Board: ASUS Sabertooth Z77
Power: Corsair AX850W (70A)
HEATware
Currently playing: Planetside 2, Dead Space 3, Call of Juarez: Gunslinger
Will Mantle remove Directx from game? how about OpenGL ?
CPU : Athlon X2 7850,Clock:3000 at 1.20 | Mobo : Biostar TA790GX A2+ Rev 5.1 | PSU : Green GP535A | VGA : Sapphire 5770 Clock:910,Memory:1300 | Memory : Patriot 2x2 GB DDR2 800 CL 5-5-5-15 | LCD : AOC 931Sw
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
"With Mantle, an @AMDFX 8350 underclocked to 2GHZ, the game is still GPU bound on a R9 290X - no loss in frame rate"
3570K @ 4.5Ghz | Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H | 7970 Ghz 1100/6000 | 256GB Samsung 830 SSD (Win 7) | 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD (OSX 10.8.3) | 16GB Vengeance 1600 | 24'' Dell U2412M | Corsair Carbide 300R
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
These tweets are from the Oxide demo (look at the hardware.fr article mentioned above):
http://www.hardware.fr/medias/photos...G0043521_1.jpg
FX-8320 + Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 + 16GB Crucial Elite 1866 CL9
If this gets a decent amount of support and is adopted well then this could be great for consumers
The cpu market would become very competitive (for gaming).
Going to keep an eye on this![]()
My flickr - My blog it'sfilmnotmovie
Thats what i mean, we must have to remember that while chip is larger and hotter, PD chips ARE comparable with 4 core i7`s when workload is properly MT.
All this makes it probable that system with AMD 8 core and R290X is gonna be faster at mantle games than 4 core i5/i7 with comparable nvidia card`s.
Interesting times ahead.God damn, AMD make at least 6 core Sr on Fm2!
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
IF (with caps) Mantle would be successful, then it will actually be a widely de facto industry standard, won't it ? I don't see any problem with that, knowing that Mantle is deep down GPU agnostic, just like what was suggested in the slide. It will be up to the other IHVs (nVidia, Intel, even mobile graphic IHVs like PowerVR, ARM, etc) to built their own extensions and adapt/optimise their GPU designs to get the best performance possible with Mantle.
Rig:
Intel Core 2 Quad 9400 @4.0 GHz watercooled
AMD Radeon HD 5850 @950 MHz
4 GB Adata Vitesta
DFI LanParty X38
Creative XFi
2 WDC black 640 GB RAID 0, 2 WDC caviar 1.5 GB
Silverstone 700 w
Thermaltake Kandalf
24" Samsung LCD TV full HD
I guess bright days will come for my brothers MSI GX60 witch decent 7970M bootlenecked by Trinity APU.
MORE !!!!
i5 2500K (L041C124) @ 5GHz + Scythe Mugen 2 rev. B | ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 UEFI L3.19 | ADATA 2x4GB DDR3 1600 | MSI Radeon RX 470 4GB | 2x Crucial m4 64GB SSD RAID 0, Seagate 7200.12 500GB, Samsung F4 EG 2TB | 24" HP LP2475w | EVGA SuperNOVA G2 750W | Fractal Design Define R3 | Windows 10 64 bit
A funny thing occured to me just now... Isn't this a bit like 3DFX's Glide API? Or is that different?
CPU: i5 3570k @ 4.2 Ghz
Memory: 2x4gb Kingston HyperX @ 1600Mhz
Graphics: Sapphire 6950 Toxic on BenQ XL2420TE
Board: ASUS Sabertooth Z77
Power: Corsair AX850W (70A)
HEATware
Currently playing: Planetside 2, Dead Space 3, Call of Juarez: Gunslinger
So AMD made a CPU geared towards multi-threading, and then worked on something that makes games make better use of it's CPU multi-thread capabilities? Where's the jackpot? Mantle won't help in real world applications? It doesn't need to, AMD cpu are already competitive price\performance with Intel in multi-thread apps, there's multiple reviews benchmarks proving that. Plus there's the GPU to help in real world apps, open-CL Handbrake saw a performance jump above 100% in a trinity APU. Kaveri with proper software support will be a beast, and AMD is working a lot with devs in these days.
Bookmarks