1.0vid @ 1.33v -180c
Originally Posted by L0ud
Nice! Results!
@Splave nice
indeed even q9650@4.5ghz wasnt enough.. then again depends on the apps/settings used
concentrated on getting the system stable and went up this high on ambient air/thermalright silver arrow/1.5vcpu
Q is will it be stable running the 580s @ high 3d clocks.. thats coming up
Nice result m8! Is that cpu on water now! Have been thinking of getting a 980x but sandy bridge is kind of putting me off!
thanx! no bro no changes still same cooler from above^ im not into watercooling dont have any cpu/gpu waterblocks
Nice overclock on air! I think i will get a 980x my cpu is letting me down! I can only get 4.3Ghz max! Had like 5GHz on water! When ocing the 580 there very cpu limited!
I bought an MSI 580GTX. It has a green pcb with a 1.03 VID but its not a good clocker. Stock VID with fan @ 85% can only do 900mhz 3D03 benchable...
Best I can do for now on air but the score seems low to me...thought I'd be much closer to 110K with these clocks.
Asus green and yellow pcb but 1.013v vid for both of them. Stockcooling 85% fan:
i7 3960X@5ghz, Asus Rampage IV Extreme, 8gb Gskill RipjawsZ PC19200C8, Corsair force GT 240go, 2XGTX Titan, MM Ascension, Seasonic X-serie Gold 1250W, Watercooling
i7 3930K@5ghz, Asus Rampage IV Extreme, 8gb Gskill RipjawsZ PC17000C9, OCZ Vertex 3 120go, GTX670 DCU2 Top, MM Pinnacle, Corsair AX850, Watercooling
I'm intrested in gaming performance, not so much in Vantage or other benching programs.@Splave nice
indeed even q9650@4.5ghz wasnt enough.. then again depends on the apps/settings used
[i5 2500K, ASrock extreme3 gen3, Corsair Vengeance LP 8GB 1600MHz, Palit GTX570 Sonic Platinum, CM HAF932, Antec Truepower New 650w]
look thru all of first post - i didnt remove q9650 results
in crysis 950mhz gpu single 580/aa 16xQ @ 980x beats 975mhz gpu single 580/aa 4x @ q9650
just an example like i said it depends on the game and settings
980x
q9650
thanx! yeah hawx2^ is a good example 5ghz 980x aint enough for sli 580 high clocks
sorry to hear.. what vgpu ? increase mem clock to 1100-1150 and youll get better score/sI bought an MSI 580GTX. It has a green pcb with a 1.03 VID but its not a good clocker. Stock VID with fan @ 85% can only do 900mhz 3D03 benchable...
Best I can do for now on air but the score seems low to me...thought I'd be much closer to 110K with these clocks.
very niceAsus green and yellow pcb but 1.013v vid for both of them. Stockcooling 85% fan:
keepers!
Very nice Allen
[CENTER]The post counter is not an intelligence meter!
MAX11L - "It's like a console...with the suck turned down and the awesome turned up" -tet5uo
Heat Team IRONMODS
Using stock vid of 1.03v for my runs for now. Even with increased mem clocks I am still puzzled on how some people are getting higher GT3/GT4 scores on similar clocks.
An improvement but still not what I expected....something is missing.
it could be your system memory what clocks is that at and timing!
Doesn't look too bad. Would be nice to see those gaming benches done at cpu clocks people usually have (something like 3.2GHz-3-6GHz) Not all of us have watercooling.
[i5 2500K, ASrock extreme3 gen3, Corsair Vengeance LP 8GB 1600MHz, Palit GTX570 Sonic Platinum, CM HAF932, Antec Truepower New 650w]
Very nice , 1.0 VID on LN2 is very strong
Some benchmark at 3.8Ghz
Default 580 Clocks
[IMG][/IMG]
900C/4500M
[IMG][/IMG]
985C/4500M
[IMG][/IMG]
580 card scale really well!
Last edited by bro20000; 11-22-2010 at 03:25 AM.
I don't think its memory, I have it at 900mhz with 7.6.5.15 1T. Maybe its just that i7 is stronger in those particular game tests than my setup.
Last edited by MTP04; 11-22-2010 at 10:13 AM.
does this look like watercooling to you?? go poop on someone else if you got nothing better to do
Allen you need another 1.000vid and youll do a lot of damageVery nice Allen
thats low oh it needs higher vgpu than that v1.1xxUsing stock vid of 1.03v for my runs for now. Even with increased mem clocks I am still puzzled on how some people are getting higher GT3/GT4 scores on similar clocks.
An improvement but still not what I expected....something is missing.
im not a 3dmark expert i just runem consecutively always
run it with nature selected only first and see you if get higher fps that way
runem all in certain order - check the 3d section
nonetheless you still need to increase vgpu/core/mem
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks