Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
+500 MHz boost on all cores will very good, example 3.5 GHz Zambezi will most of hard aplication jump at 4000 MHz, but still is 3.5 Ghz model for comparsion with others. Remember, SB will also agressive turbo....Where is any new info about AM3+ boards or chipset?
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
oh believe me I am not referring to VMware cost, that is peanuts and well covered with the current licensing model of advanced and enterprise plus. Although not confirmed yet I would assume that the at least the enterprise plus lic will grow with the core count. More issues i have is for example Oracle deploys when you are not allowed to have multi instance setups and virtual resources do not count for licensing![]()
All non-MCM server processors to date has a counterpart at the consumer side. Now AM3 is being replaced with AM3+. At the the server side this change obviously can't be done just as easily, so the change will be further down the road. That brings me to 2012 and socket C2012, which has three channels of RAM.
Do we have a possibility that AM3+ is a triple channel design? If it isn't, it should be replaced by a triple channel design around the same time as C2012 arrives. And such short lived sockets isn't something AMD usually do.
Any thoughts?
Does AM3+ allow one to upgrade to BDv2/BD-next-Gen CPUs?
about AM3+ we know maybe 1/4 years ago....
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
JF i think there is a typo here :
AM3r2 or AM3+ instead i think“Zambezi”
Market: Desktop
What is it? four-, six-, or eight-core 32-nm AM3 socket desktop processor based on the “Bulldozer” processor architecture for the enthusiast market.
Planned for introduction: 1H 2011![]()
JF,
This slide says Komodo & Trinity are scheduled for 2012 and description says: "Next generation Bulldozer CPU cores":
But this slide shows that the next generation Bulldozer isn't coming until 2013 and there will be "enhanced Bulldozer" in 2012:
So will Komodo & Trinity be based on enhanced Bulldozer or next generation Bulldozer? Thanks,
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
I think, it will simillary refresh as Phenoms to Phenoms II (but bulldozer will be not bad as B2 Phenoms 65nm :-) )
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Yeah I Think they meant that Komodo will get enhanced Bulldozer core while 2013 brings another level of improvement(similar to tick-tock in intel's case). Maybe in 2013 we will see new Fusion or new instruction support like some compiler patches suggest.
who said to take away turbo? it will still exist, i only bring this up because it turbos all cores.
it really depends on how often it would need to throttle. if its really less than 5% of the work a client computer would do, then its a hidden feature they would never notice, and always think it was running full speed. and like i said before, the code which can pull in enough heat to max it out, probably is so strong anyway that performance will be fine.
again, never said to take it away.
i think it would be quite something to see stock clocks not just hit 4ghz, but fly right past it. with the turbo feature we will probably still see similar clocks being sold, even though its able to turbo over 4ghz. the marketing of first ever 4ghz cpus with turbo, should be worth so much more than an "all core turbo"
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
So Sepang will have integrated PCIe 3.0 and a new socket,
while the client counterpart Komodo will use external NB PCIe, and stay at AM3+ just because the socket isn't old?
We're talking about the same AMD who recently said Zambezi won't work in current boards because it would cripple the performance, but a Komodo with AM3+ sounds like hampering the CPU to me.
Besides that, AMD have no trouble telling us that the 2012 servers need new sockets even at this early stage, but they can't add "AM3+" next to the Komodo in the roadmap, like they usually do?
They avoid mentioning the socket type in the kind of slides they usually wouldn't. Making substantially different CPU dies for 1-2P server and client, it must be a first one for AMD.
I smell a new socket for Komodo, and it's part of my 2010 rant: AM3+ is a bad compromise.
_____________________________
No one seems to know why the GPU is only mentioned with one of the CPU's, when both can be used with graphics cards, and neither of them are supposed to have graphics on die.
Maybe they mean integrated PCIe when they say "designed to couple with DirectX® 11 GPUs" (and not integrated GPU like I thought at first).
I can't come up with a better explanation.
I've still haven't seen any official slide or confirmation about so called socket AM3+.
and:
"“Zambezi”
Market: Desktop
What is it? four-, six-, or eight-core 32-nm AM3 socket desktop processor based on the “Bulldozer” processor architecture for the enthusiast market. Planned for introduction: 1H 2011"
source
So maybe there won't be any AM3+ for Zambezi.
-
Oh there will be a new socket.The key is the new BD power gating features which AM3 can't support properly.So they could have crippled desktop Bulldozer or launch (electrically) new socket which will make use of all the BD core potential. AM3+ and AM3 pin counts may not change at all,but the arrangement and electrical properties will. BD will have much more advanced power and clock gating than Thuban could ever dream of...
I am looking forward to trying a couple of these 16 core BD chips in the Asus KGPE-D16 board here.
VERY solid board with 2-12 core MC 6168's in it now.
32 threads for WCG will be VERY nice.![]()
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Bookmarks