Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 126

Thread: AMD Phenom II X6 | Turbo CORE 101

  1. #51
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    yes, some models are good for 400mhz, some 500, but sofar i dont know if that means we will always see the max turbo, or no turbo, or if there are stages, but since its a P state, i assume it means its max or no turbo, just how many cores is the only variable
    I think the last digit determines if its 400mhz or 500mhz, because the 960T has 400mhz boost and so does the 1090T....
    Coming Soon

  2. #52
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    I think the last digit determines if its 400mhz or 500mhz, because the 960T has 400mhz boost and so does the 1090T....
    yeah we went over all that before, it kinda sucks that at launch we wont have the 1095, or 1075, and the 1055 will be the 125W version instead of the 95W version. so all the ones i would want will be out in Q3

  3. #53
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    yeah we went over all that before, it kinda sucks that at launch we wont have the 1095, or 1075, and the 1055 will be the 125W version instead of the 95W version. so all the ones i would want will be out in Q3
    I specially miss the 1075T, now my choice will be between a i7 930 or a 1075T. I wanted the E5620 instead of the i7 930 as a option but it will be more expensive than i want to go.
    Coming Soon

  4. #54
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by TRICHEESE View Post
    The key words here are: 'up to' and 'depending on CPU model'
    Yeah it's very complicated : 400Mhz over stock clock across 3 cores if model number ends with "0" or 500Mhz over stock clock across 3 cores if model number ends with "5" . So with 1090T model you have 125W 3.2Ghz hex core OR 3.6Ghz three core,depending on the load scenario.The TDP is never crossed ,it's a guarantee(dedicated HW inside the chip,not temperature based).It can only be the rated value or below the rated value(95W or 125W),no matter if Turbo kicks in or not.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Yeah it's very complicated : 400Mhz over stock clock across 3 cores if model number ends with "0" or 500Mhz over stock clock across 3 cores if model number ends with "5" . So with 1090T model you have 125W 3.2Ghz hex core OR 3.6Ghz three core,depending on the load scenario.The TDP is never crossed ,it's a guarantee(dedicated HW inside the chip,not temperature based).It can only be the rated value or below the rated value(95W or 125W),no matter if Turbo kicks in or not.
    So even if you have just a single compute-intensive software thread its going to turbo 3 cores? That doesn't seem very efficient to me... just sayin.

  6. #56
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    381
    that's orange to apples... What you said can be reversed when looking at games today, most of them use 2 cores so they will get a nice boost in CPU power.

  7. #57
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestrider View Post
    So even if you have just a single compute-intensive software thread its going to turbo 3 cores? That doesn't seem very efficient to me... just sayin.
    id bet u will see 5 cores at .8 ghz, and 1 core at 3.x ghz

  8. #58
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    970
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestrider View Post
    So even if you have just a single compute-intensive software thread its going to turbo 3 cores? That doesn't seem very efficient to me... just sayin.
    I bet you will never have a case where there is a single compute-intensive thread, unless the intention is to intentionally isolate one core, for some strange reason. Or if you run out of date and obsolete software. Both seem pointless, unless you are bias for or against one architecture.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by flippin_waffles View Post
    I bet you will never have a case where there is a single compute-intensive thread, unless the intention is to intentionally isolate one core, for some strange reason. Or if you run out of date and obsolete software. Both seem pointless, unless you are bias for or against one architecture.
    One word: virtualization.

  10. #60
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    381
    so? You run 6 instances and your done.

    Turbo on Intel or AMD is not for well threaded apps, it's for old/low-threaded apps, to give better perf.

    In virtualization you need more cores mainly, so you can run more instances.

  11. #61
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Would be cool to be able to configure these states by ourselves.
    Pretty smart implementation either way!

    probably thinking like a top of the line cool n quiet for the oc'er ???? 4ghz at a certain volt ... and when you put more load certain core will overvolt and oc to 5ghz if the heat can be taken out of equation??? if so we are thinking about the same thing


    Quote Originally Posted by FatAlbert View Post
    what about Cold bug 64NOMIS?

    same 45nm fab process so i doubt that they have one .... queue the LHE joke
    Last edited by Sn0wm@n; 04-08-2010 at 04:31 PM.

  12. #62
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    599

  13. #63
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Uk,Midlands
    Posts
    2
    I think this will be my next upgrade

    Im going back to AMD!

  14. #64
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    [M] - Belgium
    Posts
    1,744
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    it's annoying when these sites put up the info knowing they have not bloody stock
    Belgian stores already have stock


    Belgium's #1 Hardware Review Site and OC-Team!

  15. #65
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post
    Some good news for overclockers in here:

    The big achievement is how they manage to get six cores running at
    3.2 GHz at the same TDP as a quad core 3.2 GHz Phenom II X4 955.
    The 140W 965 is only just now going EOL being entirely replaced by
    a 125W version.

    It's almost comparable with a full process node improvement like Intel
    did by going from a 130W quad core 3.33 GHz 45nm Nehalem to the
    130W six core 3.33 GHz 32nm Westmere.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...i-x6,2604.html
    http://www.techreport.com/discussions.x/18731
    http://anandtech.com/show/3641/amd-d...o-core-enabled
    http://hothardware.com/News/AMD-Turb...logy-Revealed/

    The first two sides mention low-k and THG specifically mentions it as
    going between the metal lines so most likely the speed improvements
    are indeed due to to lower RC-wire delays.

    This looks to be very good news for overclockers since the RC delays
    are basically temperature independent. You can't improve them by cooling,
    so LN and LHe results are for a large part determined by RC delays.


    Regards, Hans.
    Can I just say it's a pleasure to read your posts?
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  16. #66
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by jmke View Post
    Belgian stores already have stock
    really daaamn ok
    nothing here
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  17. #67
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    @jmke
    And reviewers have their samples?

    2 more weeks to go ...

    BTW it will be interesting to see how 6-core is coping with DDR-2 memory. Will it show bigger difference going to DDR-3 than Phenoms X4 were showing?
    If AMD will use faster NB clocks then I bet it will!
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  18. #68
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Lightman View Post
    @jmke
    And reviewers have their samples?
    No. Review samples have yet to be send out.
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,653
    No cold bug again
    i5 2500K @ 4.9GHz+ 8GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @1600Mhz CAS 6 Asus P8P67 Pro CrossFire 6970's @ 950/1450
    Xeon X5677 @ 4.5Ghz 6GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @1600Mhz CAS 7 Gigabyte EX58-UD5 4870x2
    i7-880 @ 4.2Ghz+ (still playing) 4GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @2300Mhz CAS 9 Asus Maximus III Formula MSI Hawk 5770

  20. #70
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    hm, il like for overclocking, better than PII C3? Or simillary (air/watter)?
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  21. #71
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    560
    come on! show us the results already!
    Phenom Monsta - Gallery
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T | MSI 790FX-GD70 | Dominator 1600 C8 8GB | 4770 CF | 2xWD640GB Raid0 | 2xWD1.5TB Raid1 | Corsair HX850 |Lian-Li PC-7FW
    Enzotech Luna Rev.A | 2 x MCW60 | MCP-350 | XSPC Dual DDC Res | TFC Monsta 420/360 Limited Edition


    Canon EOS 7D | EF-S 17-55 F2.8 IS | Nissin Di866 | D-Lite4 | 17" MiniSoft | 53" Midi-Octa | 7" Reflector + 20º Grid | Explorer XT SE | Crumpler 6MDH

  22. #72
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    how will the 960T price compare to the 965?

    that will really be awesome if these unlock

    960T + asus 890gx for the win

    will these be available April 26th or is that just a paper launch?
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  23. #73
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Bangkok,Thailand (DamHot)
    Posts
    2,693
    960T with unlocked to 6cores will be my next cpu
    Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
    EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
    Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
    [history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K

  24. #74
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    i think, it will not possible unlock 960T up x6 (different solutions than core Denebs)
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  25. #75
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    960T is Thuban based,so unlock is a possibility.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •