I mean, that's great, but do we really need a new product for a 100mhz speed boost? They couldn't have gone to 3.2ghz? Considering the 940 is really a sub-80W part, I imagine 3.2ghz should be possible using the 125W TDP bracket.
100mhz doesn't seem enough to be happy about, was looking for a 200/333mhz boost to cheer about.
Already posted -----> http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=214860
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
The new 710-720 x3 cores, Are they defective deneb quads or are they actual tri cores, And why 7.5mb cache?
What does this say about deneb yields? Did it not take over a year to get enough defective agenas to launch x3.
Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
Psu:Corsair Hx620
Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...
less wasted silicon more for profit.
Tri cores get higher IPC since they have more l3 cache to use for all three cores, same with dual core ones with l3 cache.
HAF922 (3 fan upgraded) 700w ModXtreme
MSI GD-65 // HIS 5850 // Saitek Esclipse
Core i5 750 @ 3.32Ghz (OC Genie) Megahalem w/ 1200rpm Scythe Slipstream
G. Skill RipJaws DDR3 2000 4x2 gig
Samsung SpinPoint F3 1TB // 5:1 Dell Surround
24inch Samsung ToC // MX518
I hate when companies tech is lacking that they have to keep increasing clock speed to gain numbers. Its like where AMD was a year or two ago. They should just bust out a 4Ghz chip and save themselves the extra time and silicon wasted.
i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.
There's no way they could launch a 4GHz chip. You play with a Phenom II yet? Most require 1.5vCPU or greater and the TDP shoots through the damn roof. I liken Phenom II to Netburst, it scales well but needs cooling.
Why are you guys against tri-cores?
AMD knows that even against wolfdale clock for clock they can't do much. So they throw you a bone and you get an extra core.
And with most games only being dual core optimized, that leaves you a free core to deal with the OS/background processes.
Seems decent enough to me. As long as the price is comparable to wolfdale, I think AMD board owners will enjoy the tri-cores.
Amazing. Tick, tick, tick, tock.
For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.
.
.
I was wondering the same...
Either they are committing good quad-cores to sell as tri (stupid idea) or yields are worse than on 65nm (most likely). This or other way consumer wins, because tri-cores will be cheaper and less energy hungry. Perfect for HTPC/gaming machines, not so great for workstation/servers.
On the other thought 1st quarter volume of Agena/Barcelona was definitely MUCH lower than it is on newer 45nm stuff. Looking from this angle is hard to say anything about yield of AMD 45nm process.
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
3.1ghz is completely unnecessary? 3.2 or 3.266ghz would be good. Much of the point of the top end processor from both INTEL and AMD is that they have an unlock multiplier, so the actual frequency portion is not as important anymore. That being said, you need a bigger megahertz difference to make that part relevant.
Tricores are not a bad idea actually. They help AMD diversify the deneb lineup a bit and lets AMD discontinue obsolete processors. AMD needs to discontinue the athlon x2 altogether. Its just a really old architecture at this point and will help AMD image.
Ph2 core is smaller. yields must be way better otherwise there weren't so much Ph2 in the market.
And in 1 month 6 new cores come to market in volume. yields can not be a problem with actual roadmap.
Btw these new tri core are way better. more cache, more clocks, higher ipc, better overclocking. Now these tri-cores can make the hole difference. The Ph1 tri-core was very weak.
i was wanting no clock increase i want an am3 BE as cheap as i can get it at launch of a good amd board
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
Bookmarks