MMM
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Microsoft Quietly Slips Out The 65 nm Xbox 360?

  1. #1
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607

    Microsoft Quietly Slips Out The 65 nm Xbox 360?

    Seems theres a hidden advantage to the Special Halo 3 Edition of the Xbox 360.

    its got the falcon core that lots of people been waiting for.

    regular Xbox 360 and Elites = 90 nm.
    Halo 3 Edition of the 360 = 65 nm??

    not 100% sure, but alot of the guys over at xbox.com forums seem 100% sure this is the new falcon core.
    atleast, its nothing like the normal xbox 360, that can be said for certain.

    Among the Things observed with the new halo 3 edition of the 360 - very low noise fan, heatsink seems cool to the touch, and barely producing any heat...

    supposedly.

    although, alot of this is from the people on the xbox forums grilling the few halo 3 edition owners that were willing to take thier new 360's apart to do these pics.

    all credit and such goes to the guys on the xbox forums.
    pics and all.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	65 heatsink.JPG 
Views:	969 
Size:	67.0 KB 
ID:	65020   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	90 nm heatsink.jpg 
Views:	1043 
Size:	121.5 KB 
ID:	65021   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Cores.JPG 
Views:	1050 
Size:	122.9 KB 
ID:	65022  




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    495
    Neat, that might actually be a reason to buy halo with an xbox :P

    CM Stacker 810 w/ Yate Loons | Enermax Infiniti 650W
    ASUS P5K Deluxe | Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400 2x2GB
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 | Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    BFG Geforce 8800GTS 640MB | ASUS Ageia PhysX P1 128MB
    Logitech G15 | Logitech G5

  3. #3
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Well "The secret updated" I think Halo 3 is the reason. They do no want problems bundled with it. lol

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    seems like Turok was 7 mins faster

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=160559

    but finally 65 nm. what is the smaller DIE beneath the 90 nm Core?
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    1,195
    Have you just posted pics of a 65nm update of the cpu and a 90nm version of the gpu as a comparison?

    The new consoles still have a 90nm gpu I believe so If they were posted to show the new edition thats one thing, but the wording makes it out to be a comparison.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    the gpu remained the same afaik
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    Kunaak, the pic that has "Regular Xbox360 90nm core" written on it is the ATi r500 GPU, and AFAIK the die shrink is just for the 3 core IBM CPU. Just letting you know (No flaming intentions)
    Last edited by Turok; 09-29-2007 at 11:26 AM.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    536
    Too bad it's the GPU that overheats lol.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    LOL @ halo3 core

    i want DOA core!

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by vudoodoodoo View Post
    Too bad it's the GPU that overheats lol.
    Well, the original heatsink was just a thin, rectangular block of aluminum with short fins, but the new GPU heatsink is simmilar, but a bit denser over the GPU and with a copper heatpipe (don't know if the contact base is copper, though), and the reduced CPU heat should help bringing the inner ambient temp. down.

    Before


    After
    Last edited by Turok; 09-29-2007 at 12:24 PM.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    This won't help too much....

    I REALLY don't understand what microsoft is doing. The gpu is the problem child of the system, not the CPU. Yet, they shrink the CPU to 65nm and leave the gpu at 90nm, and ontop of that leave the cpu with the nice heatsink and the gpu with the little low-rider dinky thing that could probably barely manage a stock clocked yonah.

    In short, I really don't see this stopping dead systems, since the problem isn't the cpu but instead is the gpu.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    256
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    This won't help too much....

    I REALLY don't understand what microsoft is doing. The gpu is the problem child of the system, not the CPU. Yet, they shrink the CPU to 65nm and leave the gpu at 90nm, and ontop of that leave the cpu with the nice heatsink and the gpu with the little low-rider dinky thing that could probably barely manage a stock clocked yonah.

    In short, I really don't see this stopping dead systems, since the problem isn't the cpu but instead is the gpu.

    can't remember but, isn't 65nm cheaper to produce?

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Yes, and generally produces less heat and uses less power. Thus, the reason I say I don't understand wtf microsoft is doing by only shrinking the cpu when the gpu IS the problem child.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    1,195
    the gpu's due a shrink as well, but as the gpu is the more complex part its inevitable that the cpu would be producable at acceptable yields first.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    3,200
    Maybe they are waiting for ATi to get 55nm in gear?
    "To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."

  16. #16
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    uhh ins't the core in the first picture the GPU? the smaller die in the first picture is cache. Maybe they integrated cache and GPU this time around? just a thought...

  17. #17
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    1000 Elysian Park Ave
    Posts
    2,669
    Yup, that looks like a comparison between the GPU and the CPU ^ Also is it not up to ATI to shrink the GPU??
    i3-8100 | GTX 970
    Ryzen 5 1600 | RX 580
    Assume nothing; Question everything

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vegas ,NV
    Posts
    1,636
    did they increase the frequency at all with this die shrink?

    if not that is still cool for xbox owners i guess. hear they have some heat issues
    ~

  19. #19
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
    Maybe they are waiting for ATi to get 55nm in gear?
    Didn't MS buy the design to ATI? so now they deal directly with TSMC or whoever is fabbing those chips.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Piotrsama View Post
    Didn't MS buy the design to ATI? so now they deal directly with TSMC or whoever is fabbing those chips.
    yep, they learnt from their mistake with nvidia - when production cost go down microsoft will see the savings - wheras nvidia saw increased profits on the original xbox.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •