MMM
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 93

Thread: Who can build 2x high performance 7950GX2 copper GPU block?

  1. #26
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,682
    Okay since you are discussing water block design albeing for GPU, I have a question.

    If flow is important, then why do so many blocks have squared off edges.

    As where being curved and streamlined? Like long oval shapes.

    Or have (can't think of term) but vertical fins that are longer yet allowing for flow..............like fins on fish/whales

    thing, long, curved.....................someone get my meaing, having a brain freeze at the moment.
    fermiNow Dave will see FERMI where ever I go
    Quote Originally Posted by jbartlett323 View Post
    So please return to the "Darkside of the Moon" and check your "Pulse" while you wait for the "Animals" that will be "Obscured By Clouds". And watch me wave as I say "Wish You Were Here" in "A Momentary Lapse of Reason"

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    852
    Try to make it as little 90 degree bends as possible. Especially that 180 it'll kill flow. You don't have to make it too restrictive either. They are mobile gpu's heh.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,330
    Don't worry, I have more ideas, it was a simple puttin that one down on paper.

    Also, in dealing with flow, a properly placed corner can introduce turbulence, allowing more of the water to contact the surface, ensuring better heat transfer. That said, there are some major nitwits in block design too.

    Picked up my old Maze4 CPU and had a brainstorm, more later...

    Edit: Check this out, it's not as refined as I want it, but it's a lot closer. Tell me what you think this time...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	waterblock 2.JPG 
Views:	532 
Size:	43.9 KB 
ID:	48681  
    Last edited by Kayin; 06-27-2006 at 12:00 PM.

  4. #29
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    USA/California/Sacramento
    Posts
    1,619
    looks like it would work
    Asus P5B-Deluxe 0614
    Conroe E6400 @ 2.56ghz
    Team Xtreem DDR2 2x1GB @ 900
    ATI X1900XTX // MC14 Ramsinks -DEAD- Using spare 7900gt now
    Hitachi 80gb | Hitachi 80gb | Seagate 320gb
    Mountainmods U2-UFO Original Black \\ BenQ DVD-RAM
    Corsair Hx620
    Swiftech Storm r2 \\ Swiftech MCW60 \\ Swiftech MCW30 \\ Thermochill PA120.3 \\ Swiftech MCRES Micro \\ DDC+ Plexi Top

    Heatware | Guide To Current WaterCooling Components | Guide To WaterCooling and Leak Testing

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    well, before I start PMing people, I would like to know if a independent loop with a Thermaltake Tide Water Plus will give a overall better temp for all my components, since the CPU is also being cooled by the 1/2" loop.

    Tell me if moding a Tide Water Plus this way will give better temps overall:
    The WC case will be verry close to the case, and the overall tubeing will be verry short to maximize head pressure. My plan is to change the Tide Water Plus's design from a parallel cooling solution to a series cooling solution with shorter transparent tubeings, a T-line instead of the reservoir, the copper radiator will be cooled in between two SanAce fans (the spot with less blind spots that I found), and the tubeing wont be bent as narrow as the Tide Water's interior. Without the mod these blocks (Which have a copper interior) could cool a 7950GX2 core at about 35 C Idle and 42 C Load. They will probably perform even better with this mod.

    This is how the Thermaltake Tide Water Plus looks like out-of-the-box:


    This is how I want to mod it:



    It looks like a pretty good solution for those who want to OC a 7950GX2 and cant find or dont have the money for a custom block.
    If the custom block kills performance on the whole 1/2" loop, or if its too complicated to build, then I will probably go with the Tide Water Plus solution shown above.
    If this solution it more efficient than running it with the 1/2" loop, is there a custom loop that will perform about the same or better that will cost cheaper?

  6. #31
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayin
    Don't worry, I have more ideas, it was a simple puttin that one down on paper.

    Also, in dealing with flow, a properly placed corner can introduce turbulence, allowing more of the water to contact the surface, ensuring better heat transfer. That said, there are some major nitwits in block design too.

    Picked up my old Maze4 CPU and had a brainstorm, more later...

    Edit: Check this out, it's not as refined as I want it, but it's a lot closer. Tell me what you think this time...

    yeah see that is waht I was trying to say, though if you don't mind I altered it a little bit, would a design like this have any affect positive or negative over the original?

    Make the vertical fins longer into and out of the curve to for more surface area.
    Last edited by phelan1777; 04-10-2008 at 11:48 AM.
    fermiNow Dave will see FERMI where ever I go
    Quote Originally Posted by jbartlett323 View Post
    So please return to the "Darkside of the Moon" and check your "Pulse" while you wait for the "Animals" that will be "Obscured By Clouds". And watch me wave as I say "Wish You Were Here" in "A Momentary Lapse of Reason"

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    336
    I'll CAD something up once I get aCAD 2007 DL'ed.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    Would this design work?
    I didnt know what pints to put where the question mark is :P


  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,330
    Practically all you need there is a single fin.

    The big deal with GX2 blocks though is that the sinks cover RAM and the bridge chip, both of which must be cooled and I'm betting that watercooling the RAM will allow a rather nice OC on those, considering how twitchy my x1900 XTX was about RAM temps.

    I just got my PS back, I'll make a cleaned up version of that block and post it up, if anyone here is interested in messing with the design.With PS I can make a lot better curves and stuff, though, so it'll work a lot better.

    If someone can shoot me the dimensions I have to cover I bet I can do even better... I'm flying by the seat of my pants as it is.

    Pic three, this is a much better quality one...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	waterblock-new.jpg 
Views:	489 
Size:	113.6 KB 
ID:	48686  
    Last edited by Kayin; 06-27-2006 at 02:53 PM.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayin
    Practically all you need there is a single fin.

    The big deal with GX2 blocks though is that the sinks cover RAM and the bridge chip, both of which must be cooled and I'm betting that watercooling the RAM will allow a rather nice OC on those, considering how twitchy my x1900 XTX was about RAM temps.

    I just got my PS back, I'll make a cleaned up version of that block and post it up, if anyone here is interested in messing with the design.With PS I can make a lot better curves and stuff, though, so it'll work a lot better.

    If someone can shoot me the dimensions I have to cover I bet I can do even better... I'm flying by the seat of my pants as it is.

    Pic three, this is a much better quality one...
    How about something like this to solve the ram-sink issue?
    Would uneven ram cooling be a problem?


    I dont think the SLI controller on the 7950gx2 will need watercooling.
    A passive chipset cooler or a large ramsink seems enough to me.
    Last edited by Turok; 06-27-2006 at 03:24 PM.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,330
    I'm gonna go out on a limb and say possibly not, but I won't be the guinea pig.

    Technically that design will work, though. And from what I know of bridge chips (HSI/Rialto) the cooler it runs the faster it goes. I'm not the ultimate authority, mind you, just very well read and rather interested in cooling design. It would benefit from some more turbulence, and shot- or media-blasting the channels will add some surface area as well.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayin
    I'm gonna go out on a limb and say possibly not, but I won't be the guinea pig.

    Technically that design will work, though. And from what I know of bridge chips (HSI/Rialto) the cooler it runs the faster it goes. I'm not the ultimate authority, mind you, just very well read and rather interested in cooling design. It would benefit from some more turbulence, and shot- or media-blasting the channels will add some surface area as well.
    Well, I just made those two blocks without fins or pints just to show a possible solution for the GPU block. With a channel already created, one can simply fine tune it to the proper resistance so it disipates heat well.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,330
    Let us know how they go...

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayin
    Let us know how they go...
    What do you mean?
    I dont have the tools nor the skills to make a GPU block :P
    Thats why I made this thread. I just asked questions and proposed solutions to see if anyone here knew if it can work so I can ask a block builder to build me one.
    But first, I would like to make sure if its really worth adding two more blocks into my loop or should I make it a separate 1/4" loop using the Thermaltake Tide Water Plus. Check post #30 above to see if you can help me.
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=30
    Please read carefully, since some questions are scattered around the post and I dont know if the drawings could be complicated to understand
    Last edited by Turok; 06-27-2006 at 06:37 PM.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    How about this design?
    The tubes that overlap the memory chips will act as ram waterblocks, and the rest of the memory chips will have ram-sink.
    Waterblock Gurus: Is this the optimal 1/2" ID solution for the 7950GX2, or is there a better design?
    Note that the fins on the waterblock are right above the GPU and it covers all the GPU area.
    As Burn sugested, I spreaded out the 1/2" ID chanel to compensate the narrow space, so it will be like a wide but flat 1/2" chanel. (Second pic)
    I also made a small mountain where the fins are to increase pressure in that area.


    "
    Last edited by Turok; 06-29-2006 at 03:26 PM.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Evje, Norway
    Posts
    3,419
    why not spread the base out so it covers the ram too? it would prolly cool the ram enough!
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    Not to be outdone by rival ATi, nVidia's going to offer its own drivers on EA Download Manager.
    X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
    Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
    HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
    Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
    C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
    DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
    Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab

  17. #42
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    280
    Quote Originally Posted by Turok
    How about this design?
    The tubes that overlap the memory chips will act as ram waterblocks, and the rest of the memory chips will have ram-sink.
    Waterblock Gurus: Is this the optimal 1/2" ID solution for the 7950GX2, or is there a better design?
    Note that the fins on the waterblock are right above the GPU and it covers all the GPU area.
    As Burn sugested, I spreaded out the 1.2" ID chanel to compensate the narrow space, so it will be like a wide but flat 1/2" chanel. (Second pic)
    I also made a small mountain where the fins are to increase pressure in that area.


    "
    Nice
    CNC Waterblock Builder
    Q9550, Rev. E0
    Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
    4GB G.Skill DDR2-1000
    eVga GTX 260 Core 216 Superclocked
    3 Western Digital 80GB, RAID 0; 500GB Seagate 7200.11
    Silverstone OP750 PSU

    Extreme Watercooling
    Swiftech MCR-QP 360
    D-Tek Fuzion v1
    Laing D5
    D-Tek Fuzion GFX rev. 2

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by eXa
    why not spread the base out so it covers the ram too? it would prolly cool the ram enough!
    Because watercooling the GPU is more important than watercooling the memory.
    The performance gains from watercooling the memory vs passively cooling it with ram sinks is verry small (AFAIK).
    Watercooling the ram also makes each waterblock more restrictive.
    It also increases the cost for each block, because whoeven can make that block for me will have to use more copper.
    I also think its enough to cool the SLI controler on the left with a small pasive chipset cooler.

    Quote Originally Posted by eXa
    Nice
    thx
    So is it too hard to build it?
    Will it perform verry well?
    Any detailed comments?

    Ive never built a waterblock,
    so I dont know if everything is perfect.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Evje, Norway
    Posts
    3,419
    i think you could simplify it a bit more! maybe doing ala EK blocks over the core. and i didnt mean exstending the entire block over the ram just the bottom. so not more restrictive than without. i think passively cooling the ram would make it heat up pretty good in there!

    if you move right out(in)let more to the right you dont have to make the channel sving back into the center again! just run it straight out like the other!
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    Not to be outdone by rival ATi, nVidia's going to offer its own drivers on EA Download Manager.
    X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
    Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
    HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
    Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
    C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
    DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
    Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by eXa
    i think you could simplify it a bit more! maybe doing ala EK blocks over the core. and i didnt mean exstending the entire block over the ram just the bottom. so not more restrictive than without. i think passively cooling the ram would make it heat up pretty good in there!

    if you move right out(in)let more to the right you dont have to make the channel sving back into the center again! just run it straight out like the other!
    Do you mean like this?




    Or like this?




    I made the previous one into a 'U' shape, because I thought it was resistant enough to pull out heat, but unrestrictive enough to get good flow.
    I saw is as if the water enters straight down and crashes on the curve, the fins, and the little mountain pulling out all the heat it can, and then it exits upwards doing a small turn absorbing a bit of heat as it takes the turns.
    Like a suden crash and then a steady flow outwards.
    Last edited by Turok; 06-29-2006 at 04:04 PM.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    234
    In case anybody was interested in this thread, I posted about a block for the 7950GX2 posted on the INQ today: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=16
    XS lurker, posting newbie.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,331
    This is how it would look with the legs that hold it, the ramsink, and the heatsink on the SLI controller.
    Is there anyone with a 7950GX2 that can build it?
    I dont have a 7950GX2 yet, but if someone is willing to build a sample, I will try to buy it soon to give exact measurements of everything




    Quote Originally Posted by Got Chow
    In case anybody was interested in this thread, I posted about a block for the 7950GX2 posted on the INQ today: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=16
    Yeah, that looks pretty restrictive, and that better not be aluminum
    It has a lot of 90 degree turns, too.

    In case anybody was interested...
    I was wondering why people are not verry interrested about this thread? Ive seen people in other threads that want a better cooling solution for their 7950GX2, but non have shown up to keep this thread alive
    Im posting new design and everything to see if people are inspired to try building the block or supporting with new ideas... guess not.
    Last edited by Turok; 06-30-2006 at 10:05 AM.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    280
    Can you send me CAD files so I can take a peek at them? In about 2 months I can have a fully functional CNC mill.
    CNC Waterblock Builder
    Q9550, Rev. E0
    Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
    4GB G.Skill DDR2-1000
    eVga GTX 260 Core 216 Superclocked
    3 Western Digital 80GB, RAID 0; 500GB Seagate 7200.11
    Silverstone OP750 PSU

    Extreme Watercooling
    Swiftech MCR-QP 360
    D-Tek Fuzion v1
    Laing D5
    D-Tek Fuzion GFX rev. 2

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    234
    My buddy runs a CNC shop and I could have a couple made. However, he will charge for the CAD stuff. If anybody can get ma a CAD file of a prototype, I'll see about having a couple samples made...
    XS lurker, posting newbie.

  25. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Burn
    Can you send me CAD files so I can take a peek at them? In about 2 months I can have a fully functional CNC mill.
    Can you post a layout pic of that card here, I'll be able to make a block with 3d's max.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •