MMM
Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 116

Thread: X1900GT Reviews And Info

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247

    Talking X1900GT Reviews And Info

    X1900GT Reviews And Information

    It's about time we got one. Looks like the 3 thread per topic limit has reached so a sticky will now be used for ALL X1900GT news.

    Official Info: http://www.ati.com/products/radeonx1...onx1900gt.html


    Sapphire X1900GT Info



    Link: http://www.sapphiretech.com/en/produ...s.php?gpid=147

    Connect3D X1900GT Info



    Link: http://www.connect3d.com/products/pcie_x1900gt.htm


    Powercolor X1900GT Info



    Link: http://www.powercolor.com/global/mai...ail.asp?id=118


    HIS X1900GT Info



    Link: http://www.hisdigital.com/html/produ...d=238&view=yes


    Gecube X1900GT Info



    Link: http://www.gecube.com/products-detai...&prod_id=61620


    Reviews

    HKEPC (Thx Ubermann)

    THe Inquirer (*cough cough*)

    Bit-Tech

    Technic3D

    ocworkbench

    Computerbase

    VR-Zone

    PowerColor X1900GT vs X1800XT 512MB @Elitebastards

    Performance (PowerColor Version)

    Very overclockable card, right now @ 648/900MHz from the default 500/600MHz with default cooling and voltage:


    increased voltage to 1.375v, goes up to 705MHz core from 500 and 900MHz memory from 600.... need better cooling from here on:


    Performance Review: http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=68335


    ~XS News Team
    Last edited by onethreehill; 05-16-2006 at 05:14 AM.

  2. #2
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    I wonder if it can be unlocked
    Pity that it only has 256Mb of GDDR3
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  3. #3
    -150c Club Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Northeast, USA
    Posts
    10,090
    Really doesnt offer much difference nnstep. I bet that a x1900GTX gets released at 512mb to spite nvidia.


    If you have a cooling question or concern feel free to contact me.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    118
    Hopefully the extra quad will be unlocked easily.
    If so this is much better news than the X1800GTO->xl mod.

  5. #5
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337
    Really doesnt offer much difference nnstep. I bet that a x1900GTX gets released at 512mb to spite nvidia.
    I can tell you right now that Difference of 256Mb of Ram does make one heck of a difference in the EyeCandy and FPS in Large Screens
    Plus the GPU folds alot better the more Graphics Ram you have..
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  6. #6
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,970
    Well, ATI had to dump their defective cores some day. Through a performance perspective, 7900GT can always be OC'd to 7900GTX since it's fully unlocked by default. We don't know if X1900GT is yet, so 7900GT may be the better pick. On the other hand HDR+AA is a nice feature, as is H.264 decoding. Let's hope this tightens the competition and fine SKUs at fine prices is the result.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    I have a feeling that in 5 years. WD, Seagate etc will be some unknown names.
    (Posted by Shintai, 08-18-2008)

  7. #7
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    I can tell you right now that Difference of 256Mb of Ram does make one heck of a difference in the EyeCandy and FPS in Large Screens
    Plus the GPU folds alot better the more Graphics Ram you have..
    Yup, ATI benefits especially from the extra memory. This will definitely hurt performance, but how much is hard to tell from case-to-case bases.

    Here is one article showing some differences between 7800GT 256 and 512. There are lots more out there, just to tired to find them. Remember, the better the GPU the more the bottleneck 256MB will show. And again performance hit on ATI parts when frame buffer is exceeded is worse than on Nvidia.
    http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=33&page=5
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    I have a feeling that in 5 years. WD, Seagate etc will be some unknown names.
    (Posted by Shintai, 08-18-2008)

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    225
    In the past the GT version of ATI cards were not meant to compete with the GT versions of Nvidia cards. I'm sure the X1900 XL will be the direct comptetition for the 7900 GT just as the X1800 XL was the competition for the 7800 GT, X800 XL, 6800 GT, and so on...

    The GT ATI cards are there to compete with the 7600 series, just as the X800 GT competes with Nvidias 6600 series.
    Last edited by NinjaWreck; 04-10-2006 at 04:54 PM.
    Heatware
    DFI NF4 SLI-DR Expert | Opty 170 0530 @ 2.8Ghz | Scythe Mine | 2x1Gb Mushkin Redline CE-5 @ 280mhz (3-3-2-5)
    2x EVGA Nvidia 8800 GTS 640 SLI @ 660/1960 | Viewsonic VX2025 | 74Gb Raptor & WD 320Gb SE16 | Silverstone Zeus 750 watt

    ASUS DRW-1814BLT W/ LightScribe | Sound Blaster X-Fi | Medusa 5.1 headset | Lian Li PC-V1000BW | Saitek X52


    DFI NF4 Ultra-D| AMD 3800 X2 | XP-90 | 2x1Gb Muskin Blue BE-5 @ 255mhz (2.5-3-2-0)
    EVGA 7900 GS | Viewsonic VX724 | WD 250Gb SE16 | OCZ 520watt

    Samsung 52X/16X CDRW/DVD | Samsung 52X CDRW | SB Audigy Gamer

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    Let's not forget the 7900GT only has 256MB as well
    oh man

  10. #10
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowmage
    Let's not forget the 7900GT only has 256MB as well
    At the same time the 7900 is not remotely as Memory sensitive as the X1800.
    Compare the difference between a 7900GTX and a 7900GT at the same speed.. it is reasonably close..
    Do the same for the X1800XT (512) and the X1800XL at the same speed.. and it isn't even funny how different it is...
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    It doesn't matter. The X1900GT should still perform better than the 7900GT.

    EDIT: After looking at the scores here: http://www.behardware.com/articles/5...ing-of-3d.html

    I've come to the conclusion that those scores are bugged. In most of those situations, the graphics card doesn't even use up the 256MB of RAM.


    EDIT2: This is very strange. VideoMemWatcher states that most games don't use more than 256MB (optimized for 256MB), especially when run at only 1280x1024. Why would it make a difference then?

    http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/h..._xt_256_mb/10/

    Someone should do some more research with VideoMemWatcher with an ATI card.
    Last edited by Shadowmage; 04-10-2006 at 05:11 PM.
    oh man

  12. #12
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,970
    Shadowmage, take a look at the link I posted before
    http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=33&page=1

    Here you can see the amount of video and system RAM different games allocate. Most games seem to always allocate some system RAM, even though video RAM isn't full. But at 1600 and 1920 resolutions, 256MB quickly becomes very small, especially if you add some AA and AF to the mix in addition to HDR. And just like nn_step said, ATI is much more sensitive to cache trashing (or whatever running out of buffer memory is called) than nVidia. Why is anyone's guess and has caused lots of speculation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    I have a feeling that in 5 years. WD, Seagate etc will be some unknown names.
    (Posted by Shintai, 08-18-2008)

  13. #13
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    158
    I wonder if it unlocks... 0_o

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Grand Forks, ND (Yah sure, you betcha)
    Posts
    1,266
    I personally think it's really clever, the specs.

    A 12rop/36ps 256mb part with 1.4ns (1400mhz) ram.

    Even if ATi didn't go full-out to keep them from unlocking, and just flashed a different bios disabling the quad, there is no product that this could flash to. There is no 256mb x1900 part (other than the AIW, which I doubt would work) and besides the XT's use faster stock-clocked ram via the bios then the 1.4ns chips can most likely handle, especially with the stock hsf. I don't know the gpu/vmem voltage on the GT vs XT's and if the differance would allow for that speed bump over what they're rated for, but I doubt it.

    If this can be flashed, it will be to the x1900xl, which will come much later, probably around (if not later) than the time we see the Rv570 x1900gto which will replace the gt and most likely be cheaper than the GT because of it's cheaper production costs, but with the same specs.

    Why would they do this? Obviously Rv570 will not take the bios flashes since it's a different core, and stopping something retroactive like gt->xl at that point will not be as big of a deal, as people at that point will be buying rv570 cores that cannot be flashed to the newly released XL.

    That's my guess anyway, and that's why I think the product is clever. I doubt many are made, as it's obviously a stop-gap until rv570 which will do the same thing, but be smaller/cheaper (even at 90nm) since it was made to be 12/36.
    Last edited by turtle; 04-21-2006 at 06:30 PM.
    That is all.

    Peace and love.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    179
    Looks like a May 1st release possibly.
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31161
    Core i5 750 3.8GHz@1.3v under OCZ Vendetta 2
    MSI P55-GD65
    3x Kingston X25-V RAID0
    2x Evga 9600GT SSC SLI
    G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB DDR3-1600
    Corsair VX550w, Ghettoed Antec Super Lanboy

    Heat: http://heatware.com/eval.php?id=48663

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX USA
    Posts
    1,381
    does it matter that it if unlocked it won't match a product? i have an x800gto unlocked to 16 pipes by simply changing the quad lock in the bios using hexeditor and rabit, and it still recognizes it as an x800gto... would that not work the same with the x1900gt?(well, like the x800gto's, im sure not all can be unlocked, but assuming some could..)
    Athlon XP-M 2500+ 0343MPMW The King is Dead!
    Phenom II X6 1090T 1025GPMW Long Live the King!

    -------------------------------------------
    I'm from the church of the operating room

  18. #18

  19. #19
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    ~$400
    And how it`s gonna compete with 7900GT with that price tag ?

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Yep, that's right folks, a whopping $400 price tag for now.

    That'll probably change by release day, but for now, they're wanting an insane $400 for this card... $30 more and you have a x1900xt.

  21. #21
    XS News
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,010

    X1900GT Reviews And Info

    Everything extra is bad!

  22. #22
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786
    That looks really good. They should have included some benchmarks from Oblivion and NFSMW.

    Also, I saw it had 1.4ns from the pics, and its only running at 595MHz. Last time I played with BJ14 it went to 693MHz on super tight timings and 800MHz relaxed. So there is a lot of room for that here.

    How could HKEPC screw up the specs of the 7900GT

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  23. #23
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,693
    that 7900gt scored 8114 in 3dmark05.
    isnt that a lil low? i get more with lower clocks and less pipes with my 7800GT.

    i had expected a lil more or am i wrong?

    in games they seem to score more or less equal.
    the x1900gt wins a few tests and the 7900gt wins a few but nvr really more then a few fps.
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    Groucho Marx



    i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    449
    the question is if the pipes are unlockable and how overclockable the x1900gt, with proper cooling, is.
    E8400, P5Q-E, Crucial 2x2GB , XFX 8800GTX , Corsair HX620W
    D-TEK Fuzion, MCW60, Thermochill PA120.2, MCP655

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    54
    101% Agree w/ Higgins.



    Just curiosity, but wasn´t the 1800xt the 7900gt´s competition?
    I tought that was a tight fight there.
    Dont know why then the poin of realeasing other vga...

Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •