Page 82 of 205 FirstFirst ... 32727980818283848592132182 ... LastLast
Results 2,026 to 2,050 of 5495

Thread: SSD Write Endurance 25nm Vs 34nm

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    After about 40hrs of running with only 6GB of free space on the drive, Wear Range Delta has jumped up to 20. I would expect it to be a little higher by tonight when I post an update. Unfortunately, I need the those extra 6GB to get the file count over 10K, or it will crash during file deletes after a few hours.

    With less static data and more free space the wear range delta had been mostly holding steady. Now with the increase in static data and half as much free space, there's not much room left for wear leveling. I think I'll run it like this for a little while and see where it ends up.




    Anvil,

    Corsair's 1.3.2 is 3.3.0 I believe.
    OCZ and Corsair rename their FW to make FW comparisons difficult -- which is silly. In OCZs case though, they throw some other stuff on top for more performance in some areas.
    Last edited by Christopher; 10-18-2011 at 08:51 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    I'll send you a preview of the next beta, there are some tweaks you could try.
    My Force 3 will have to run another 4-6 hours before I'm willing to make any changes.

    Also I'm going to reinstall the ASRock Z68 tonight, just to make sure that I'm running a non tweaked installation.
    (will be upgrading the old Vertex 1 as well, it's on fw 1.5 and 1.6/1.7 looks to have fixed a lot of issues + better Endurance)
    -
    Hardware:

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    211
    Nothing seems to be able to stop the M4. Not even 1 reallocated sector !?

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NE Ohio, USA
    Posts
    1,608
    Quote Originally Posted by bulanula View Post
    Nothing seems to be able to stop the M4. Not even 1 reallocated sector !?
    It's still at 0 reallocated sectors genius
    24/7 Cruncher #1
    Crosshair VII Hero, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 AIO, 4x8GB GSKILL 3600MHz C15, ASUS TUF 3090 OC
    Samsung 980 1TB NVMe, Samsung 870 QVO 1TB, 2x10TB WD Red RAID1, Win 10 Pro, Enthoo Luxe TG, EVGA SuperNOVA 1200W P2

    24/7 Cruncher #2
    ASRock X470 Taichi, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer 280 AIO, 2x16GB GSKILL NEO 3600MHz C16, EVGA 3080ti FTW3 Ultra
    Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe, Samsung 870 EVO 500GBWin 10 Ent, Enthoo Pro, Seasonic FOCUS Plus 850W

    24/7 Cruncher #3
    GA-P67A-UD4-B3 BIOS F8 mod, 2600k (L051B138) @ 4.5 GHz, 1.260v full load, Arctic Liquid 120, (Boots Win @ 5.6 GHz per Massman binning)
    Samsung Green 4x4GB @2133 C10, EVGA 2080ti FTW3 Hybrid, Samsung 870 EVO 500GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Rosewill Rise, EVGA SuperNOVA 1300W G2

    24/7 Cruncher #4 ... Crucial M225 64GB SSD Donated to Endurance Testing (Died at 968 TB of writes...no that is not a typo!)
    GA-EP45T-UD3LR BIOS F10 modded, Q6600 G0 VID 1.212 (L731B536), 3.6 GHz 9x400 @ 1.312v full load, Zerotherm Zen FZ120
    OCZ 2x2GB DDR3-1600MHz C7, Gigabyte 7950 @1200/1250, Crucial MX100 128GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Centurion 590, XFX PRO650W

    Music System
    SB Server->SB Touch w/Android Tablet as a remote->Denon AVR-X3300W->JBL Studio Series Floorstanding Speakers, JBL LS Center, 2x SVS SB-2000 Subs


  5. #5
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by Anvil View Post
    I'll send you a preview of the next beta, there are some tweaks you could try.
    My Force 3 will have to run another 4-6 hours before I'm willing to make any changes.

    Also I'm going to reinstall the ASRock Z68 tonight, just to make sure that I'm running a non tweaked installation.
    (will be upgrading the old Vertex 1 as well, it's on fw 1.5 and 1.6/1.7 looks to have fixed a lot of issues + better Endurance)
    1.7fw for the Vertex looks to have a few problems. Originally it was yanked due to what OCZ calls an installer problem. Subsequently it was released, but some are still having installation issues. Once you get it installed, some have had issues with the drive exhibiting strange behavior. 1.7 is supposed to manage some aspects of drive endurance and wear leveling differently, but I'm using 1.6 on three drives and find it to be pretty good over 1.5's good-but-not-great write amplification. I may try upgrading one of my Agilities to 1.7 to see what the fuss is about. I'd like to try the new Arrowana FW if they ever get their stuff together and get it out, but it doesn't seem to be doing the new VertexPlus drives any favors -- they're far more problematic than any SF2200 drive floating around out there. The Arrowana FW for old school Indilinx drives was supposed to boost random performance by 5x according to OCZ (back in May, in a press release), but I doubt it's ever going to come out now.

    I think I'll upgrade the older Agility now -- what's the worst that could happen??

    EDIT
    There is an AgilityTrb1.7 file in the 1.7 updates for Indy drives... What's up with that?
    Last edited by Christopher; 10-18-2011 at 01:37 PM.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    wasnt aware there was a 1.7 for the older vertex. interesting. on 1.6 for my drives.

    is 1.7 stable?
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  7. #7
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    wasnt aware there was a 1.7 for the older vertex. interesting. on 1.6 for my drives.

    is 1.7 stable?
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  8. #8
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by Computurd View Post
    wasnt aware there was a 1.7 for the older vertex. interesting. on 1.6 for my drives.

    is 1.7 stable?
    They had it out a few months ago... but removed it. Back in September they brought it back out. I just flashed my Agility from 1.6 to 1.7 -- I think you should probably stay where you're at for the moment. My Agility seems a fair bit slower, but it could be an optical illusion... or I have a brain tumor. Not sure.

    Now I feel extra stupid because I noticed that there was an AgilityTurbo 1.7 in the update .zip files, so I posted about it on the forums, and I got the "we never released it answer"... I was hoping they had developed some kind of faster Agility FW somewhere along the line and were going to hook it up. The 4K randoms on my Agilities are pathetic... like 8GB PATA SSD pathetic, SD or CF pathetic... no where near as good as Bluestang's Franken-tex or my 120GB Vertex Turbo.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Corner Brook, Newfoundland
    Posts
    145
    got a buddy that has been using this FW on 4 30 gb vertex turbos in R0 on x58 mobo, has been stable for about a week now, previously he could only go a day or two and drives would start to drop out...we shall see, got 4 of them turbos myself somewhere

  10. #10
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    Arowana will only run on 34nm Nand Vertex/Agility/Solid2 drives, so unless you have a drive with 34nm Nand on it, Arowana will not work.
    Vertex Plus is not "far worse than SF-2000" is.. already released a firmware update and have another one ready. Should resolve the 2 issues we have seen.

    Vertex/Agility have ALWAYS had anemic 4K's in AS-SSD, no Cognac build will change that. Also, the smaller the drive, the slower the 4k with that controller.

  11. #11
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by RyderOCZ View Post
    Arowana will only run on 34nm Nand Vertex/Agility/Solid2 drives, so unless you have a drive with 34nm Nand on it, Arowana will not work.
    Vertex Plus is not "far worse than SF-2000" is.. already released a firmware update and have another one ready. Should resolve the 2 issues we have seen.

    Vertex/Agility have ALWAYS had anemic 4K's in AS-SSD, no Cognac build will change that. Also, the smaller the drive, the slower the 4k with that controller.
    In my experience the 2281 issue's gravity really depends on what the hell you're doing with the drive; So I wasn't crestfallen once I spent a couple weeks figuring out what was going on, though some might be more sensitive. Once I figured out that there was only one thing I needed to do for my 2281 endurance drive, I've not had any problems since. It just took a couple weeks of throwing ideas against the wall, trying this and that, to come to a solution that works for me and my system. I guess you could say that I was lucky in that my usage and system resulted in crazy consistent crashes, which makes it easier to work around.

    Have you seen how awesome Bluestang's drive is in 4K's? Fantastic for a 64GB... it's a thing of beauty. It's seriously Hall of Fame material.

    My one Agility is hamstrung by other factors as well. I knew it wasn't so hot when I bought it, and if I didn't, I sure as hell figured it out when I bought another one last month. I might piss and moan about them, but I sure do have an unreasonable fondness for my Indilinx units -- all of them.

  12. #12
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    The drives have been offline while reinstalling and upgrading the boot drive.
    (no issues except for PE count spec was halved for some reason, used to be 10K and is now 5K, health 92%->83%)

    Kingston SSDNow 40GB (X25-V)

    403.95TB Host writes
    Reallocated sectors : 12

    --

    Corsair Force 3 120GB

    01 120/50 (Raw read error rate)
    05 2 (Retired Block count)
    B1 64 (Wear range delta)
    E6 100 (Life curve status)
    E7 49 (SSD Life left)
    E9 195534 (Raw writes)
    F1 260392 (Host writes)

    power on hours : 770

    Both drives restarted the test just minutes ago.
    -
    Hardware:

  13. #13
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Anvil,
    from 1.6 on, V1/Agility/Core2s only have 5k PEs now. Even if it had 50nm Samsung @10K PEs, it will only be 5K now.

    Some people got upset, but if the NAND doesn't fit, you must acquit.
    Last edited by Christopher; 10-18-2011 at 04:18 PM.

  14. #14
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 60 Update, Day 27

    05 2
    Retired Block Count

    B1 12
    Wear Range Delta

    F1 255227
    Host Writes

    E9 196853
    NAND Writes

    E6 100
    Life Curve

    E7 10
    Life Left

    Average 126.49MB/s Avg
    RST drivers, Asus M4g-z

    620 Hours Work (24hrs since the last update)
    Time 25 days 20hours

    12 GiB Minimum Free Space
    The AnvilPro beta9 preview's 500ms/thousand files is working, and I've reduced the pause a few seconds.

    If it runs overnight, I can declare victory on the 2281 TRIM/delete problem, but the additional loops per hour might be hurting speed slightly.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mushkin Day 27.JPG 
Views:	1478 
Size:	152.7 KB 
ID:	121412

    Thanks for the preview, Anvil. So far so good.
    Last edited by Christopher; 10-18-2011 at 04:24 PM.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    but I sure do have an unreasonable fondness for my Indilinx units -- all of them.
    couldnt agree more, excerpt the complaining part LOL. seriously LOVE my indys, still have them all. dont even need my 8 member array, but i keep it for sentimental reasons, seriously i love them.

    i have 12 of them spread out around here....was going to endurance test one of them for the sake of science, just cant bring myself to do it
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  16. #16
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by Computurd View Post
    couldnt agree more, excerpt the complaining part LOL. seriously LOVE my indys, still have them all. dont even need my 8 member array, but i keep it for sentimental reasons, seriously i love them.

    i have 12 of them spread out around here....was going to endurance test one of them for the sake of science, just cant bring myself to do it
    It's not like I didn't know that random performance gets worse as capacity decreases... I didn't necessarily need an expert to testify on that subject, but Eric seems to be a nice guy, and I'm glad he's still sticking his head in the door over here.

    I sure as hell didn't need the last two Indy drives I bought. I put my oldest Agility 60 in my Dell D630 laptop, just because I like the drive so much. It sure as hell isn't the fastest Sata II drive I have laying around, but using any of the others just doesn't feel right. Weird, isn't it? I surely don't feel that way about my GPUs. Like I said, it's irrational.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    211
    So then what is the consensus ? Can we not read the Samsung because it genuinely failed or because of the connector damage ?

  18. #18
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Kingston SSDNow 40GB (X25-V)

    405.20TB Host writes
    Reallocated sectors : 12

    MD5 OK

    37.56MiB/s on avg (~10 hours)

    --

    Corsair Force 3 120GB

    01 84/50 (Raw read error rate)
    05 2 (Retired Block count)
    B1 65 (Wear range delta)
    E6 100 (Life curve status)
    E7 49 (SSD Life left)
    E9 198247 (Raw writes)
    F1 264008 (Host writes)

    106.25MiB/s on avg (~10 hours)

    power on hours : 780

    WR delta looks to just keep on growing, strange!
    -
    Hardware:

  19. #19
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    609
    A little update from me:
    I'll be joining in with 2 more ssd from monday. Those will be:
    - Intel X25-M G1 80GB
    - MTRON Pro SSD 32GB

    What makes them interesting is 50nm mlc and G1 controller without trim for the intel and slc nand for the MTRON. I'll post all the usual data before the test is started.
    I would like to thank GullLars for selling them to me.
    1: AMD FX-8150-Sabertooth 990FX-8GB Corsair XMS3-C300 256GB-Gainward GTX 570-HX-750
    2: Phenom II X6 1100T-Asus M4A89TD Pro/usb3-8GB Corsair Dominator-Gainward GTX 460SE/-X25-V 40GB-(Crucial m4 64GB /Intel X25-M G1 80GB/X25-E 64GB/Mtron 7025/Vertex 1 donated to endurance testing)
    3: Asus U31JG - X25-M G2 160GB

  20. #20
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by B.A.T View Post
    A little update from me:
    I'll be joining in with 2 more ssd from monday. Those will be:
    - Intel X25-M G1 80GB
    - MTRON Pro SSD 32GB

    What makes them interesting is 50nm mlc and G1 controller without trim for the intel and slc nand for the MTRON. I'll post all the usual data before the test is started.
    I would like to thank GullLars for selling them to me.
    Doesn't the MTRON use the Indilinx controller?

    Anvil, I don't think the 500ms helped as much as I thought. It crashed during file deletion again this morning.
    Last edited by Christopher; 10-19-2011 at 07:01 AM.

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    87
    Poor Samsung 470

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	tshirt-rest-in-pieces2_lg_thumb-200x200.jpg 
Views:	1367 
Size:	36.2 KB 
ID:	121428

  22. #22
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    The MTRON is much older than the Indilinx stuff, iirc it's their own controller and technology.

    Strange that it didn't help but I'm not surprised.
    The new fw has a fix for TRIM so lets see what it brings, I expect most will make the new firmware available this week.
    -
    Hardware:

  23. #23
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NE Ohio, USA
    Posts
    1,608
    M225->Vertex Turbo 64GB Update:

    534.69 TiB (587.90 TB) total
    1460.48 hours
    10847 Raw Wear
    118.41 MB/s avg for the last 16.33 hours (on W7 x64)
    MD5 OK
    C4-Erase Failure Block Count (Realloc Sectors) from 9 to 10.
    (1=Bank 6/Block 2406; 2=Bank 3/Block 3925; 3=Bank 0/Block 1766; 4=Bank 0/Block 829; 5=Bank 4/Block 3191; 6=Bank 7/Block 937; 7=Bank 7/Block 1980; 8=Bank 7/Block 442; 9=Bank 7/Block 700; 10=Bank 2/Block 1066)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CDI-M225-OCZ-VERTEX-TURBO-10.19.2011.PNG 
Views:	1334 
Size:	62.1 KB 
ID:	121429
    24/7 Cruncher #1
    Crosshair VII Hero, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 AIO, 4x8GB GSKILL 3600MHz C15, ASUS TUF 3090 OC
    Samsung 980 1TB NVMe, Samsung 870 QVO 1TB, 2x10TB WD Red RAID1, Win 10 Pro, Enthoo Luxe TG, EVGA SuperNOVA 1200W P2

    24/7 Cruncher #2
    ASRock X470 Taichi, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer 280 AIO, 2x16GB GSKILL NEO 3600MHz C16, EVGA 3080ti FTW3 Ultra
    Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe, Samsung 870 EVO 500GBWin 10 Ent, Enthoo Pro, Seasonic FOCUS Plus 850W

    24/7 Cruncher #3
    GA-P67A-UD4-B3 BIOS F8 mod, 2600k (L051B138) @ 4.5 GHz, 1.260v full load, Arctic Liquid 120, (Boots Win @ 5.6 GHz per Massman binning)
    Samsung Green 4x4GB @2133 C10, EVGA 2080ti FTW3 Hybrid, Samsung 870 EVO 500GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Rosewill Rise, EVGA SuperNOVA 1300W G2

    24/7 Cruncher #4 ... Crucial M225 64GB SSD Donated to Endurance Testing (Died at 968 TB of writes...no that is not a typo!)
    GA-EP45T-UD3LR BIOS F10 modded, Q6600 G0 VID 1.212 (L731B536), 3.6 GHz 9x400 @ 1.312v full load, Zerotherm Zen FZ120
    OCZ 2x2GB DDR3-1600MHz C7, Gigabyte 7950 @1200/1250, Crucial MX100 128GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Centurion 590, XFX PRO650W

    Music System
    SB Server->SB Touch w/Android Tablet as a remote->Denon AVR-X3300W->JBL Studio Series Floorstanding Speakers, JBL LS Center, 2x SVS SB-2000 Subs


  24. #24
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Well, as long as the Mushkin only has about 12GB of static data, it doesn't matter. For some reason, even with the additional delay in beta9, I still have to compensate by lowering minFreeSpace [since I have much more static data now]. I'll be upgrading to the new FW, but Mushkin doesn't want to say that there is a 3.3.2 FW, much less that it's going to be along shortly.

    If it's going to crash while deleting files, it will do it rather soonish. I'm back to about 10K+ files per loop, so that should solve the problem in any event, somehow.

  25. #25
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher View Post
    Well, as long as the Mushkin only has about 12GB of static data, it doesn't matter. For some reason, even with the additional delay in beta9, I still have to compensate by lowering minFreeSpace [since I have much more static data now]. I'll be upgrading to the new FW, but Mushkin doesn't want to say that there is a 3.3.2 FW, much less that it's going to be along shortly.
    ...
    Corsair has the same "policy", they won't tell, I think they should make an exception, this is a serious bug for those that are affected.

    Patriot has already told that it will be made available this week. (I've got a WildFire 240GB)
    -
    Hardware:

Page 82 of 205 FirstFirst ... 32727980818283848592132182 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •