If it supports Conroe, they will surely have a major problem with XS members and the lifetime warranty![]()
If it supports Conroe, they will surely have a major problem with XS members and the lifetime warranty![]()
I've just finished reading this thread from beggining.... one word VW... AMAZING!!!
can't wait fall 2006![]()
must save my money. how about some pcmark 05 for some crazy mutitasking benching.
CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
Case: Modded 700D
PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's
The first Coolermaster Stacker supports two PSU's and is BTX compatible so if you're considering this mobo for a future Conroe purchase maybe that would suit you well, its got very good air flow and loads of room.Originally Posted by boostedevo
send me ur 1g*2 fat D9sOriginally Posted by kone
![]()
![]()
Why did'nt they send VW oneOriginally Posted by ORCBEAST
![]()
Going by albatrons past record with "performance" boards and backup I'll only ever believe it when I see it, and if albatron are coming out with such boards I am sure more reputable/XS orientated manufacturers will have far superior products with a warrantee you can believe in, not just some PR marketing BS
And yes, I am biased after being stung badly by albatron in the past, their tech support was nothing short of laughable
lots and lots of cores and lots and lots of tuners,HTPC's boards,cases,HDD's,vga's,DDR1&2&3 etc etc all powered by Corsair PSU's
Just wondering. Howcome my A64 3000 Venice does better WinRar than Conroe?
Screenshot
It's because your processor is heavily OCed.
All Conroe benchies by VW so far have been at stock speed.
*The Multithreaded score of the Conroe is way way better than yours btw
nice thread crap, noob.Originally Posted by RimRam
You keep your 3000+ we will all go with conroe's.
I like building Vapor phase coolers......
......to cool mynipples!!
Heat is "gclg2000"
95-0-0
-100C Cascade Club
Thats a little harsh, its a valid question and perhaps worth investigating what are the main influences in that particular benchmark to help understand how it performs on the different platforms.Originally Posted by gclg2000
Or you could just flame him, flaming is easier I guess.
As for the Venice getting higher single threaded results, I'd guess its going to come down to the higher CPU clock, FSB and tight memory timings due to overclocking, I'm not familiar with the test so don't know what its most dependant on.
Some Cinebench 9.5 and WinRAR comparation with a X2 (mine) @2.4ghz and @2.6ghz :
Cinebench 9.5:
Conroe 2.4ghz 738
X2 @2.4ghz: 669
X2 @2.6ghz: 727
WinRAR 3.6:
Conroe 2.4ghz: 1120
X2 @2.4ghz: 1168
X2 @2.6ghz: 1253
About ScienceMark, I haven't the unofficial binaries used lately by VW. So, with the official ScienceMark 2.0, this is the comparation:
Conroe 2.4ghz: 1308.9
X2 @2.4ghz: 1322.99
VW, can you run 7-zip v4.32 built-in benchmark?
7-zip download here if you haven't it http://www.7-zip.org
like I said, that lately SM result is with some unofficial binaries (I haven't them, and I don't know if they are available for download, at least, I've not found them). With the official ScienceMark 2.0 (the available version in www.sciencemark.org), it's 1308.9 for Conroe![]()
LOOK, still no match for Conroe clock for clock thoughOriginally Posted by Donni
![]()
![]()
lots and lots of cores and lots and lots of tuners,HTPC's boards,cases,HDD's,vga's,DDR1&2&3 etc etc all powered by Corsair PSU's
I love that Molecular Dynamics Score!Conroe is definitely a must. God Willing.
![]()
Core 2 Duo E6600 [L625A] 3330MHz 1.375Vcore 24/7
Core 2 Duo E6600 [L640F] 3330MHz 1.475Vcore
Crucial 10th Anv 2 x 1GB DDR2-667 @ 463MHz 4-4-4-12
ASUS P5B Dlx
FOTRON BLUE STORM 500W
TT BT with stock Fan
Gigabyte Nvidia 7600GSw/ Silent Pipe
WD Cavier 250GB
Antec P160
Originally Posted by alpha0ne
It would be nice to see the Opty score clocked at 2.4 G to see how it is scaling.
Last edited by JumpingJack; 04-09-2006 at 08:07 AM.
Fellas, why don't we just wait and see (from 2.4ghz) Conroe @ 3.0ghz+ and see how well the annihilation goes?
Now, let's just look at a Pentium D 920 overclocked to 4.02ghz which is common for this CPU to reach that speed and a Pentium D 955XE overclocked to 4.37ghz which is also common againts an X2 3800+ overclocked at 2.59ghz and the FX60 overclocked at 2.90ghz....shall well? Well, let's see it!.
Amazing that Conroe is scoring all that in a semi-buggy board. Can't wait to see what ASUS will pull......
Victor, that Tuniq Tower 120 will be my choice for when overclocking my future Conore, I'm cheap so I won't be buying the Swiftech WC kit after all, look: Ambient temp is 35f.![]()
Just like to know how the heck I can control the Vc, it's all over the place even though I have it set to 1.4500.
Last edited by Nasgul; 04-09-2006 at 03:37 PM.
ASUS P5B Deluxe P965 BIOS 1236 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 8MBL2 @ 3.15GHZ | G.Skill DDR2 800 F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ & XTreem DDR 800 D9GMH - 4GB RAM Total | 4:5 Ratio @ 350fsbx9 | Tuniq Tower 120 | BFG GeForce 9800GTX | Seagate 2x 250GB Perpendicular HDDs RAID-0 | PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W EPS12V | Samsung TOC T240 24" LCD Monitor |
Forgive me if this question has already been asked and answered, but has the April 4 BIOS release (908) been tested with a Conroe on a current D975XBX?
hey nasgul, how did you get that manufactured and supported by thing?![]()
The rig
CPUs: E6300 ES B0 @ 3220 MHz w/1.35v orthos stable | E6600 B2 @ 3400 MHz w/1.43v --> Sold | Xeon 3050 L2 @ 3304 MHz w/1.45v orthos stable
MoBo: Asus P5K-E WiFi-AP @ 520 x * orthos stable
Graphics: 256 MB Connect 3D Radeon X1900XT @ 661/828 (core/mem)
RAM: 2 x 1 GB Team Xtreem PC2 5300 @ DDR1010 4-4-4-8 / DDR1100 5-5-5-12 w/2.25v orthos stable
HDDs: 300 GB (16 MB Cache) and 80 GB Maxtor Diamondmax 10 drives
Optical: NEC ND3500AG DVD +/- RW
PSU: Antec True Power 2.0 550W
H2O
Swiftech MCR220-QP | Laing D5 | AquaXtreme MP-05 Pro LE | DangerDen Maze 4 LP | 2 x 120mm NoiseBlocker SX1 fans
Lappy
MSI MS1022 14.1" Widescreen Barebone | Celeron-M 360 1.4 GHz @ 1.86 GHz / Pentium M 715A | GeForce 6200 Go | 80 GB Fujitsu HDD | Sony DVD +/- RW
Waiting for
Nehalem
I don't think the testers have this board , maybe Fugger could get one easily but he is very absent these days.Originally Posted by SluRRR
Anyway , you need a revision 304 board to work with Conroe in the first place IIRC.
I think you are right, but I am ever the optimist.
D975XBX needs a new PCB revision, a BIOS update WILL NOT provide Conroe support for existing PCB's
Ana asks. Do you believe that the motherboards will come out for July, before the conroe?
Greetings luf1c3r
why do some of you are so sensitive and then get ugly?Originally Posted by gclg2000
call me noob or whatever you wish, I am just as interested as you (Intel disciple). By no means I am interested in any flame. take it somewhere else please.
Edit: I reduced the speed to 2.4ghz (A64 3000) and loosen timings to 3-5-5-10
and get WinRar = 684
WinRar multithreading gives same results since I dont have dual core.
This is not a flame. More than anything, I am interested in price/performance for my next upgrade, be it Intel or AMD.
Last edited by RimRam; 04-09-2006 at 03:54 PM.
I think WinRar is more ram related to a point.
my Dual core in single thread is only 647 with the CPU and Ram at 250*10 and 3-4-4 timings.
your ram is flying at 300 mhz which is making up for my 100 mhz advantage in CPU and slighly better timings.
i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died![]()
Docsis2.0
Docsis3.0
-- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.
Bookmarks