G.Skill 2x512MB PC4400FC (TCCD) OCing Report!

**bachus_anonym** · 10-15-2005, 12:33 AM

Sup X'ers!

Few days ago I received, what I should call, a *NEW* batch/revision of G.Skill F1-4400DSU2-1GBFC to play with. Among a plethora of different speed grades, this 2x512MB was placed on the bottom of G.Skill Extreme Series, meaning it's the cheapest choice from that line. The specifications are telling us that this kit is rated at 2.5-4-4-8 (PC4400) @ 2.7~2.9v.
All of the FC reviews I found on the Net mentioned that ICs used to build those modules were Samsung TCC5 0522. But apparently, G.Skill was switching ICs on this kit from TCCD to TCC5 and very recently back to TCCD again. I was informed, that the latest batch of those kits (including mine) had definetely TCCD ICs fitted onto them. Due to the fact that all G.Skill modules shipped after June 2005 are covered with heatspreaders, confirming that was not as obvious. But I manged to take a glimpse at the ICs thanks to a little gap that can be found between ICs in the middle of the module and a heatspreader. That confirmed what I was told - the kit I had was build with Samsung TCCD 0519 ICs.

Now that we have that out of the way, let's give my old Canon 2MP some 15 seconds of fame

Kit's photos are next...

**bachus_anonym** · 10-15-2005, 12:34 AM

Before we start, some preparations were needed

Equipped with few of those

,

I set everything up,

and was ready to GO!

**bachus_anonym** · 10-15-2005, 12:35 AM

This kit's default spec is 275Mhz 7-4-4-2.5-1T but I decided to fire it up at 275Mhz 6-3-3-2.5-1T @ 2.5v

All looked damn fine as SPi32M run @ 2.5v (2.54v with a DMM) so next step was SP2004.

Great news is this RAM was very stable at 275MHz 6-3-3-2.5-1T with barely above 2.50v

Bad news is, that after over an hour of playing in BIOS I could not get that kit stable at much over that and keeping TRCD=3

So, next step was, loosening TRCD to 4 and go for a ride

From this moment prepare for SuperPi 32M GALORE!!!

285Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

290Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

297Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.8v <---- voltage was set a lot higher than neccesary

303Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.8v <---- voltage was set a lot higher than neccesary

**bachus_anonym** · 10-15-2005, 12:36 AM

This is the point where I decided to drop the multiplier on my SD 3700+ as I was approaching it's maximum benchable speed. That means, this kit forced me to play with x10 multi

303Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

306Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

308Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

**bachus_anonym** · 10-15-2005, 12:36 AM

Unfortunately my time was running out and I decided to call it a night and stop at this point to run something else for a change

Memtest For Windows @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v

Quick 30mins of SP2004 LargeFFT @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v

SysTool Pi 32Million @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v

Hexus Pifast 10M @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v

UFFFFFF!!!!

**bachus_anonym** · 10-15-2005, 12:37 AM

Conclusion

Basically, I was very impressed that G.Skill PC4400FC, which is rated at lowly 275Mhz 7-4-4-2.5-1T, performs that well. I'm pretty sure that during the next few days I might be able to push them a little further and maybe work on getting this kit to work @ TRCD=3 at higher that DDR550 speed.
Considering that PC4400FC is the cheapest (about $180) of all G.Skill Extreme Series memory products, it managed to deliver quite nice and stable results.

Thanks for willing to read and watch this sort of long quasi-review

bachus_anonym

--------------
This kit was sent to me by G.Skill USA representative. I was 100% assured that it was neither hand-picked nor pre-tested before shipping it to me. I'm not associated in any way, shape or form with G.Skill. I was simply given this kit for evaluation and desided to present my tests regardless of performance. The results I obtained may or may not be on par with all other G.Skill PC4400FC kits available for purchase.

**~~Onepagebook~~** · 10-15-2005, 12:40 AM

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

and was ready to GO!

hey hey...pay me the copyright...

**Vapor** · 10-15-2005, 12:43 AM

That is quite impressive for the price....very thorough review at stable settings!

What about 2.5-3-3-x performance?

**bachus_anonym** · 10-15-2005, 12:45 AM

Kevin,

Hahaha

I remember that I've seen that somewhere before but did not know you had it set up like that too

You forgot to register in in the U.S. Patent Office

Originally Posted by Vapor

What about 2.5-3-3-x performance?

Well, TRCD=3 so far is not looking too good with this particular kit I got

I could not get it to play nice with me beyound that 275Mhz. It's pretty odd that it is so stubborn but I think and hope that there's something more in it

**~~Onepagebook~~** · 10-15-2005, 12:52 AM

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

Kevin,

Hahaha

I remember that I've that somewhere before but did not know you had it set up like that too

You forgot to register in in the U.S. Patent Office

See I know you 're gonna say this, I always use that

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...77#post1085977

**s7e9h3n** · 10-15-2005, 01:39 AM

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

See I know you 're gonna say this, I always use that

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...77#post1085977

Hey Kev - take a look @ his 12v rail - see? I told you so

@ Bachus - wonderful review on those sticks....man you've run more 32m's in this thread than I have in my lifetime

**Vapor** · 10-15-2005, 01:48 AM

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

Well, TRCD=3 so far is not looking too good with this particular kit I got

I could not get it to play nice with me beyound that 275Mhz. It's pretty odd that it is so stubborn but I think and hope that there's something more in it

Alright, with TRCD=4 performance so good it looks like it'll still be a GREAT buy if the sticks all perform close to yours.

**~~Onepagebook~~** · 10-15-2005, 02:08 AM

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Hey Kev - take a look @ his 12v rail - see? I told you so

@ Bachus - wonderful review on those sticks....man you've run more 32m's in this thread than I have in my lifetime

Now, I am running 316.1x10 pi 32m...haha. looks good so far.

**s7e9h3n** · 10-15-2005, 02:13 AM

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

Now, I am running 316.1x10 pi 32m...haha. looks good so far.

Time for you to get some sleep Kev - wrong thread man

lol

**Vapor** · 10-15-2005, 02:13 AM

Heh....Stephen, what does the 12V rail have to do with anything?

**s7e9h3n** · 10-15-2005, 02:25 AM

Originally Posted by Vapor

Heh....Stephen, what does the 12V rail have to do with anything?

It all depends on who you ask

OPB says that it should never be run @ >~12.35 Volts (and he's probably right if Oskar Wu gave him that advice). I say a high 12V rail just gives a little "cushion" for stability. I've never run into issues with a high 12v rail - I always ran my 12v on my Zippy @ 12.81 and this PCP&C 510 now @ 12.73. I figure I'm still within 10% of spec so I'm OK

OPB always tells me I need to lower my 12v rail, but I always respond with - "Well, I've seen a spi32m run by Bachus Anonym with his 12v rail @ 12.93"

**Zeus** · 10-15-2005, 02:51 AM

Nice RAM for a nice price.

What version of windows server is that you are using?
Is that the 64bit version?
I'm downloading the 32 bit trial version right now.

Your 32M at 310x10 is 3 seconds faster than mine with the same settings, could that be due to windows server OS?

**Vapor** · 10-15-2005, 03:13 AM

Could be various things but rest assured that 2k3 is faster...

**eva2000** · 10-15-2005, 04:29 AM

Bachus nicely done with 32M results

**ZeroX** · 10-15-2005, 05:27 AM

Nice results

**quent** · 10-15-2005, 02:14 PM

Hello, I made a test for www.overclocking-masters.com ( french )

link

Results :

Memtest @ 315Mhz 2.5-4-3-5 1T

Superpi 1M @ 320Mhz 2.5-4-3-5 1T

Sandra @ 322Mhz 2.5-4-3-5 1T

Link

More information on the review post

Thanks to Alice from g.skill

Quent.

**kakaroto** · 10-15-2005, 02:14 PM

Very nice work there. 310MHz 2.5-4-3-X is damn fast voor TCC5 memory!

**quent** · 10-15-2005, 02:16 PM

I tested TCCD chips

**bachus_anonym** · 10-15-2005, 02:26 PM

Originally Posted by eva2000

Bachus nicely done with 32M results

Thanks Goerge

It means a lot from such a great memory OCer/tweaker/reviewer like yourself

Originally Posted by kakaroto

Very nice work there. 310MHz 2.5-4-3-X is damn fast voor TCC5 memory!

Thank you!

Also, it's actually TCCD 0519

I needed to confirm it myself, so I used "this technique"

.

Unfortunately, I could not find a way to take a good close up of markings alone (to hard to hold a camera and memory module at the same time for a good pic) so you have to believe me

Apparently, those new modules (#0509, 0510) are made of TCCD again...

I'm pretty sure they can go at least 5Mhz further, 32M stable

I will try later, though...

**eva2000** · 10-15-2005, 05:57 PM

how well do they do on air cooled cpu ? i'm sure the sub zero cooling on cpu helps clock TCCD bit higher

Thread: G.Skill 2x512MB PC4400FC (TCCD) OCing Report!

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

G.Skill 2x512MB PC4400FC (TCCD) OCing Report!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions