13K in SLI at stock speeds, that's actually quite good. I think that with some good cooling this card has a huge heatroom for overclocking. They probably clocked it a bit low to keep the card cool with it's mighty 32 pipelines so I expect some awesome overclocking.
Also nice to see the FX57 in action![]()
Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides
Blue Reviews:
Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case
Blue Guides:
Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself
98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.
![]()
Hardware
![]()
SLI
Digital-info
Nice!![]()
Wolfdale e8400es @4.5Ghz / Ultra-120 Extreme
2GB Ballistix @ 589Mhz 4-4-4-x @ 2.5V - SPI 32M
*** Motherboards tested: DFI Blood Iron (current), Asus P5K3-dlx, DFI P965-S, P5B-Dlx, DFI RD600, Bad Axe 2, EVGA 680i, DS3 and P5W DH ***
Fan modded Zippy 850W, 500GB 7200.11 and EVGA 8800GTX @678/1062
wow, thats a pretty nice score! I'm assuming that everything was mildly oc'd... thanks for the screenies!
Nice HTT, that is fricken amazing, now all i need is a real nice printer to print my own $.
Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?
Think of something witty and imagine it here.
LOL Unimpressed...by a mile. Supposed to be at least 15k stock.....cant even muster 2x7.5k ??
Perkam
Originally Posted by perkam
ati's amr doesnt double performance either if thats what ur getting at....
Originally Posted by perkam
whats up with the low score? cpu is clocked to hell, graphics cards stock speeds?
http://www.digital-info.net/vbb/show...4839#post24839
7800 was at stock (430/1200)
9000 was at 500/1300
13000 was at stock in SLI
Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides
Blue Reviews:
Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case
Blue Guides:
Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself
98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.
Originally Posted by Wiggy McShades
You cant say that yetremember, this is two G70s...and the 15k by macci is two X850XTs
Seeing the efficiency of two X850XTs, two R520s will do at least 15k stock...perhaps more.
Perkam
the card oced to around 500/1300 on stock cooling, not bad for an early card!
but it took a 2.9ghz fx to push the 7800gtx to the 7800 3dmarks in 2k5 it is supposed to score... and considering that this is a next gen card and atis current gen cards score the same in CrossFire as two of those cards in sli im really surprised how nvidia is planning to stay on top of everything in the next months...
what are the temps of those cards like? I see lots of fans on that setup lol![]()
![]()
the cpu has a 160 mhz oc, clocked to hell?Originally Posted by pha|anx
Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?
Think of something witty and imagine it here.
Originally Posted by perkam
where teh two x850xt's overclocked ? the 7800gtx's are at stock so 13k seems about right. but i have to agree if r520 is all ati says two will definatly do better than 13k
I was referring to the fsb & multi used... and on initial glance I thought it was just an FX-55... lolOriginally Posted by Stuperman
![]()
The X850XTs were cascade cooled and at insane clocks. These cards are not.Originally Posted by perkam
Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250
@phalanx
that is a pretty sick HTT, not bad for a FX-55 on air, but I would imagine that a FX-57 could do 3ghz on air like nothing.
Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?
Think of something witty and imagine it here.
For the first review Nvidia isn't going to send out bad clocking cards. Certainly if they know they are going to lose this battle from ATI they want to make sure every benchmark with their cards shows otherwise.Originally Posted by saaya
This is a double thread (see: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=65922 ) so maybe it's better to close this one.
Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides
Blue Reviews:
Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case
Blue Guides:
Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself
98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.
I think they're going to have something else up their sleeve. I wouldn't be suprised if a lot of unexpected things come out.![]()
i merged both threads![]()
wow 9k on a little overclock seems awesome!!!!
im sure 10k with a little watter and v-mod would be easy now that would be sick single card performance without cascade or ln2
________
Yamaha tx16w specifications
Last edited by brandinb; 05-03-2011 at 07:47 PM.
I wonder if macci's crossfire result in 3dmark05 was with two 512MB cards ? SLi ( and maybe AMR ) cards both share the same framebuffer so amount and speed of memory on the cards might be very important for such high scores and from the look of the results this card is still using 256MB of 1200MHz GDDR3 RAM. Hence maybe the low scores. 3dmark05 is also vertex limited to some extent, so maybe the pixel pipelines were waiting for vertex information and not very efficient.
I am guessing that a better representation of how 7800 performs compared to r420 and 6800 is to look at the 3dmark03 nature fps and see what improvement there would be there.
I'm not an expert on multi card RAM useage though so maybe macci Opp or Shamino can tell us how SLI / AMR varies with speed of ram ( or amount of RAM if macci can confirm whether the cards he used were 256 or 512MB examples in Canada ? )
Regards
Andy
macci used 256mb card as far as i know, also remember that macci was also on beta drivers or really un-optimized drivers with arm
not impressed at all i wanted 10k 3dmark05 stock at least, the bad thing is that ati with this kinda performance by nvidia might enabled only 24 pipesnot 32.
nvidia should show the 7800ultras right now![]()
I think macci used Catalyst 5.6 drivers and they weren't beta or un-optimized.Originally Posted by metro_oc.cl
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
Bookmarks