MMM
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 41

Thread: 64 Bit Version of Cinebench released

  1. 05-21-2005, 11:04 AM #1
    Sheik
    Sheik is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    603

    64 Bit Version of Cinebench released

    As the title says.

    Homepage

    Results.

    32 Bit Version

    Rendering (Single CPU): 368 CB-CPU (Higher is better)
    Render time - 71.6 seconds

    64 Bit Version

    Rendering (Single CPU): 480 CB-CPU (Higher is better)
    Render time - 54.8 seconds.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version.  Name: 02.jpg  Views: 301  Size: 164.2 KB  ID: 30931   Click image for larger version.  Name: 04.jpg  Views: 265  Size: 168.7 KB  ID: 30932   Click image for larger version.  Name: 01.jpg  Views: 252  Size: 112.4 KB  ID: 30933  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-22-2005, 08:37 AM #2
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    thats a 30% boost right? not bad at all!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 05-22-2005, 10:01 AM #3
    Der_KHAN
    Der_KHAN is offline
    Xtreme 3DTeam Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Dresden
    Posts
    1,163
    was the 32bit version run under the old winxp or winxp-x64 ?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 05-22-2005, 10:19 AM #4
    (sin)morpheus
    (sin)morpheus is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Posts
    216
    If it really makes that much of a performance difference, then I might have a reason to install winxp x86-64.
    3500 clawhammer @ 230x11 1.7V
    Foxconn geforce 6150
    x800gto @ stock
    2x512 mismatched sticks in dual channel
    Black case of godliness
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 05-22-2005, 02:01 PM #5
    BigPanda
    BigPanda is offline
    DČOL 4 Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    166
    Send a message via AIM to BigPanda
    nice im getting 64bit windows when i get my venice


    D2OL will be on and off this summer due to heat
    man, i thought i was wierd, and then i started hanging out here at Xtreme Systems-Disposibleteen
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    Rig1-Sempron2800+,ABIT NF7-S REV 2.0,Radeon9200se,No-Name350watt PSU,
    Maxtor80gigs harddrive,K-Byte 256mb pc2100 & Ultra 256 pc2100 Ram, No-Name CD-Rw Drive
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 05-22-2005, 05:10 PM #6
    bachus_anonym
    bachus_anonym is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    I have just run both, 32-bit and 64-bit on Server2003 64-bit Edition

    289x10=2890MHZ DDR554 5-2-2-2.0-1T (just for kicks as memory speed and L2 cache size don't really matter much here)

    64.2s (32-bit) vs 48.6s (64-bit)

    Nice, 24% boost !!! It's time for software developers to switch to 64-bit, don't ya think ?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version.  Name: cinebench.jpg  Views: 193  Size: 197.8 KB  ID: 30969  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 05-22-2005, 05:12 PM #7
    perkam
    perkam is offline
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
    Hmmm...would love to see and AMD vs Intel on this software considering A64 SHOULD give it some leeway against Intel's Encoding and Multi-tasking prowess.

    Perkam
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 05-22-2005, 05:15 PM #8
    bachus_anonym
    bachus_anonym is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam
    Hmmm...would love to see and AMD vs Intel on this software considering A64 SHOULD give it some leeway against Intel's Encoding and Multi-tasking prowess.

    Perkam
    P4 HT eats alive single core A64 in that benchmark!!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 05-22-2005, 05:16 PM #9
    perkam
    perkam is offline
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
    Quote Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
    P4 HT eats alive single core A64 in that benchmark!!!
    Then perhaps the challenge lies in AMD X2 vs Pentium D ??

    Perkam
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 05-22-2005, 05:22 PM #10
    bachus_anonym
    bachus_anonym is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    As far as we have seen, AMD X2 4800+ manages a bit better result than Pentium XE 840... At least in 32-bit version
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 05-22-2005, 05:23 PM #11
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    the x2 wins, not a real challange from a performence pov, but when you look at availability and price/performence it looks good for intel, sinificantly cheaper and not much slower...

    id like to see a 840 vs 4800+ compare with the 64bit version
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 05-22-2005, 05:27 PM #12
    clayton
    clayton is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,087
    My AMD64 (x2 Opteron 252) outperformed my Intel (x2 Xeon 3.6GHZ) with EMT64 on Linux 64-bit. I guess it should be the same with WINDOWS XP 64.
    ________
    Rhode Island Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
    Last edited by clayton; 03-10-2011 at 05:55 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 05-22-2005, 05:31 PM #13
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    in what tests? compiling? how much faster was the opteron? did it have numa enabled?
    nice rigs you have there
    hmmm you need some decent memory though it seems... there is registered memory based on winbond ics that do 2-2-2 and there is other stuff based on micron ics that do 2.5-2-2

    with that much memory and interleaving enabled you should see a nice difference with faster memory timings i think.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 05-22-2005, 06:57 PM #14
    Sheik
    Sheik is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by Der_KHAN
    was the 32bit version run under the old winxp or winxp-x64 ?
    32 Bit version in WinXP32
    64 Bit version in WinXP64
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 05-22-2005, 07:37 PM #15
    bachus_anonym
    bachus_anonym is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    Since it's Sunday and I got some spare time , I re-run Cinebench benchmark. This time on 32-bit OS as well as 64-bit OS... For comparison

    This is @ 306x10=3065MHz DDR576 5-2-2-2.0-1T. Both OSes are on optimized in EXACTLY same way... Same services disabled, same tweaks...


    Cinebench 32-bit on Server2003 32-bit - 60.5s

    Cinebench 32-bit on Server2003 64-bit - 60.3s

    Cinebench 64-bit on Server2003 64-bit - 45.8s

    I thought, someone might find it interesting
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version.  Name: cinebench32_32bitOS_3065MHz.jpg  Views: 189  Size: 198.8 KB  ID: 30977   Click image for larger version.  Name: cinebench32_64bitOS_3065MHz.jpg  Views: 174  Size: 197.1 KB  ID: 30978   Click image for larger version.  Name: cinebench64_64bitOS_3065MHz.jpg  Views: 188  Size: 198.1 KB  ID: 30979  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 05-22-2005, 07:44 PM #16
    agenda2005
    agenda2005 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SC, USA
    Posts
    487
    Lets see Intel guys post result. Is this not their benchmark? Let us see how they can beat the 64-bit record. Are they shy or what?
    Core 2 Duo E6600 [L625A] 3330MHz 1.375Vcore 24/7
    Core 2 Duo E6600 [L640F] 3330MHz 1.475Vcore
    Crucial 10th Anv 2 x 1GB DDR2-667 @ 463MHz 4-4-4-12
    ASUS P5B Dlx
    FOTRON BLUE STORM 500W
    TT BT with stock Fan
    Gigabyte Nvidia 7600GSw/ Silent Pipe
    WD Cavier 250GB
    Antec P160
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 05-22-2005, 07:55 PM #17
    bachus_anonym
    bachus_anonym is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    Honestly, It doesn't take much for P4 HT to wipe the floor with that 60s I just did... 4GHz is more than enough to make it happen
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 05-22-2005, 10:37 PM #18
    Sheik
    Sheik is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    603
    My friends Dual 275 Opteron did this bench in 26.3 seconds (the 32 Bit version) Man can you imagine with the 64 Bit version !!! I phone him.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 05-23-2005, 05:21 AM #19
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    yeah give him a call!
    thx a lot michal! very interesting
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 05-23-2005, 07:16 AM #20
    ewitte
    ewitte is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    I can't get XP x64 installed (the betas worked fine!). Maybe I'll try 2003 server.

    Eric
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 05-23-2005, 01:43 PM #21
    Charles Wirth
    Charles Wirth is offline
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,656
    Send a message via MSN to Charles Wirth
    On air
    266x14 3.73Ghz

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version.  Name: cine64.jpg  Views: 638  Size: 157.8 KB  ID: 31043  
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 05-23-2005, 01:57 PM #22
    Charles Wirth
    Charles Wirth is offline
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,656
    Send a message via MSN to Charles Wirth
    Vapochill @ 1.45v

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version.  Name: cine642.jpg  Views: 726  Size: 162.0 KB  ID: 31044  
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 05-23-2005, 04:32 PM #23
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    sweet!!! thx for posting more results charles
    im curious how an amd dual core compares to this
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 05-24-2005, 02:48 AM #24
    cirthix
    cirthix is offline
    The un-extreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,149
    Send a message via AIM to cirthix
    14-SIXTY on that multiplier???

    i5 3570K@ 4.8GHz 1.32v, 32GB Gskill 1866, Gigabyte g1 sniper m3
    HD7970@1125/1575 stock voltage
    1TB F1+2*128GB Crucial M4
    Silverstone 450w, no case
    2560*1440@120Hz overclocked catleap
    Steelseries G6v2+5600dpi modded logitech trackball
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 05-24-2005, 04:20 AM #25
    MetalStorm
    MetalStorm is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    38
    Can we have a comparison between AMD 64bit and Intel 64bit? I'd like to see the speed up each one has...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules