Last edited by onethreehill; 11-15-2010 at 11:28 PM.
woop nice figs where are the dam laptops based on it?
Thanks for the links onethreehill....
Coming Soon
Anyone that got the time to make a power measurement comparison?
Gotta get to class!
Really crushes the Atom, about damn time... would make a netbook / ultra-mobile much more attractive to me now, esp. if priced right
Almost equal performance to a SU2300 + ION with much lower energy requirement nice...
Coming Soon
about time
WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD
Originally Posted by JF-AMD
cant wait for a tablet with this chip
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
I hope Intel intros that single core + HT sandy bridge CULV that i had heard about some months ago. That would be a very good match up against the Bobcat. A single core + HT SNB would certainly be energy effective enough and the original plan that i heard was that the GPU would be the same as the other CPU's.
The new GPU and CPU with dynamic clock would totally work out. But i have not heard anything about it since then the last i heard was about dual core SB based CULV's with lower clocks, which is sad given the added silicon and lower clocks.
Coming Soon
You are welcome
Legitreviews
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1470/1/
Can someone explain what the Anandtech article is trying to do? He's saying that there is disappointment when compared to the dual core Pentium. Isn't that a completely different class of system as far as form factor and power consumption?
Maybe I'm ignorant of such things.
god dammit! why isnt there an option with fast cpu and slow/cut down gpu???
Seems like someone was wrong about power consumption.
So late in my country (2:57am). Worth my time.
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
Now who could that be? It's a bit of a shame to not be able to see what his respond would be.Seems like someone was wrong about power consumption.
Looks to be a good platform, I'm actually really interested in buying one of those as my girlfriend isn't moving any time soon which means 6h of sitting idle on a train every two weeks.
Anandtech has a very strange review and conclusion, they mention that the system is much faster and healthier then any Atom yet the cpu benchmarks show a different idea because those are favorit HT benchmarks, I own a n455 with 2gb ram and ssd and it is ok for general usage, but its slow when loading things, even my ssd wasn't able to make it shine i.s.o the 7,2K sata2 hd. so it is clearly cpu limited. would like to see real world compare loading apps, and battery time. Atom has a very low TDP yet when you look at power consumption you see higher consumption then brazos.
In most of our benchmarks the performance advantage over Atom isn't huge, yet using Brazos is much better than using an Atom based machine. It all boils down to one thing: single threaded performance. Atom can make up for its deficiencies by executing a lot of threads in parallel, but when you're bound by the performance of a single thread the E-350 shines. The E-350 is 65% faster than the Atom D510 in the single threaded Cinebench R10 test. It's this performance advantage that makes the E-350 feel so much quicker than Atom.
AMD give us the 25W rated brazos in notebooks and netbooks.
yeah i stopped reading the anand review, it was bs. none of the cpus or tests made any sense. all the other reviews were great though! i thought the cpu would be a bit more powerful, but given its power draw...well you just cant beat it.
[MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
[GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
[RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
[CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
[COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
[OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
[HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
[AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1
Anandtech tests the platform as a full desktop platform.
Without actual power consumption, the platform is of course not great in pure performance view against desktop systems.
Yep, and since its power consumption is lower than a lot of the Atom configs, it's quite impressive
Hmm... is it? ASUS Eee PC 1015N (N550+ION2) has very close performance to the highest boobcat and consumes 8.5-15W depends on the load. Btw, the notebook available on newegg just for $419 and has 9.5h of battery life. Also I really doubt we will see $500 netbooks with 128GB SSD soon.
Last edited by kl0012; 11-16-2010 at 01:18 AM.
Looks like the early BOINC scores weren't even close to being representative.
its look promising
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
According to which review?
I don't find the ASUS machine in any of the reviews. Well I do find a 1015PN in the review from Techreport, but it gets it's ass kicked.
the correct term is "ass handed to"
http://www.netbooknews.com/6742/dual...n-benchmarked/
In techreports review most of the scores between bobcat & N550 were pretty close. But keep in mind that bobcat was tested with SSD, so I would want to see how it performs with 5400 RPM HD and 1GB of memory (like in 1015PN)
Unfortunately, as much as people would like, you can't really compare scores across different sites (different methodologies for example) and assume that they'd get the same score for the same platform
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks