Hi guys,
I completed the reviews for a seven thermal grease on accurate heat medium. The reviews, which is divided on two parts.
Test equipment
The Measured result for power 200W
More visit the links
http://www.cttl.cz/index.php?gid=11119
http://www.cttl.cz/index.php?gid=11136
Translated by Google:
http://translate.google.com/translat...%3Fgid%3D11119
http://translate.google.com/translat...%3Fgid%3D11136
Hmmm, it looks as if MX-3 didn't make it onto that graph?
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94vOriginally Posted by Jowy Atreides
ahoy Hgi
hmmm...no coollaboratory...no AS5...no indigo...no nanoxia...ic diamond
can you retest and post some of these plz---->
Last edited by AAbenson; 08-05-2010 at 07:15 AM.
---
---
"Generally speaking, CMOS power consumption is the result of charging and discharging gate capacitors. The charge required to fully charge the gate grows with the voltage; charge times frequency is current. Voltage times current is power. So, as you raise the voltage, the current consumption grows linearly, and the power consumption quadratically, at a fixed frequency. Once you reach the frequency limit of the chip without raising the voltage, further frequency increases are normally proportional to voltage. In other words, once you have to start raising the voltage, power consumption tends to rise with the cube of frequency."
+++
1st
CPU - 2600K(4.4ghz)/Mobo - AsusEvo/RAM - 8GB1866mhz/Cooler - VX/Gfx - Radeon 6950/PSU - EnermaxModu87+700W
+++
2nd
TRUltra-120Xtreme /// EnermaxModu82+(625w) /// abitIP35pro/// YorkfieldQ9650-->3906mhz(1.28V) /// 640AAKS & samsung F1 1T &samsung F1640gb&F1 RAID 1T /// 4gigs of RAM-->520mhz /// radeon 4850(700mhz)-->TRHR-03 GT
++++
3rd
Windsor4200(11x246-->2706mhz-->1.52v) : Zalman9500 : M2N32-SLI Deluxe : 2GB ddr2 SuperTalent-->451mhz : seagate 7200.10 320GB :7900GT(530/700) : Tagan530w
never even herd of gelid gc-extreme = /
Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?
Me neither. But it seemed to perform pretty awesome, and from what I can tell, the test method seems to be accurate. 3 seperate mounts should provide an accurate measurement. I'd like to try it out myself as well.
“Little expense had been spared to create the impression that no expense had been spared.” - Hitchhiker's GuideMondays:It's better to ask dumb questions now, than to look stupid later
Looks like the manufacturer needs to update their site
I found it at PerformancePCS for $9.99 3.5G. Adding to my cart.
Per PCs
HEATAny worklog of the girl in your avatar?
EBAY
Project Slumber Parties aka PSP Liquid Cooling Work Log
Wait a second, I just realised something, and please correct or slap me if I'm wrong, but how are the Delta T and the effectiveness of a thermal paste related? The delta is directly related to the amount of heat dumped into the system. If all parameters are the same, it means that with the Gelid less heats gets dumped into the system. That means more heat 'stays behind' in the CPU. Which would mean a higher CPU temperature.
I'll ask some other experts, but I'm pretty sure I'm right. Scgt1, you might want to wait buying one till I get some confirmation.
“Little expense had been spared to create the impression that no expense had been spared.” - Hitchhiker's GuideMondays:It's better to ask dumb questions now, than to look stupid later
Isn't delta T a way to measure how hot the CPU must be before the thermal conductivity of the _CPU surface + thermal grease_ is high enough to "move" all the heat onto whatever cooling device you've mounted on the heatspreader? (not sure how accurate that is, but this isn't a physics forum so I don't care
--->TeamPURE<---
Me neither. But it seemed to perform pretty awesome, and from what I can tell, the test method seems to be accurate. 3 seperate mounts should provide an accurate measurement. I'd like to try it out myself as wellYea that would be interesting to know although I have no idea what you really said other then it may be working against one whom wants to keep their gear cooler. LOL
HEATAny worklog of the girl in your avatar?
EBAY
Project Slumber Parties aka PSP Liquid Cooling Work Log
Delta T is the temp difference between two (or more?) measured items. Problem is, it could be CPU/water, CPU/air, water/air, air in/air out, or whatever else you wish to measure.
Circles SucQ!
If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig
Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!
I have some GC-Extreme here from when i was gonna do a thermal interface comparison, can't offer any insight as to how well it performs though since ive never tested it. Ran out of time and money when i was working on mine. I can say i've heard some good things about it, but thats about it.
[SIZE="1"]Main Rig:
- New rig incoming -
Watercooling Loop: Pump: Laing DDC 3.2 w/ XSPC Reservoir Top | Tubing: 1/2 x 3/4" | Waterblock: Apogee GTZ | Radiator: XSPC RS360 | Fans: 3x Delta FFB1212EHE | Fittings: Fatboy Barbs | Other: 5ft Custom Bong Cooler for benching
His write up explains the Delta T as the temp difference of the 200w heat source and the incoming water temp. The higher the thermal conductivity of the paste, the lower temperature difference between your heat source and cooling medium is needed for a given heat flux. Assuming that contact area, heat source power output, and thickness of the paste are constant, deltaT times the thermal conductivity of the paste remains constant. As thermal conductivity of the paste increases, the deltaT required to move the heat decreases. In the graph, the low deltaT is better.
So in English the Gelid kicks ass?His write up explains the Delta T as the temp difference of the 200w heat source and the incoming water temp. The higher the thermal conductivity of the paste, the lower temperature difference between your heat source and cooling medium is needed for a given heat flux. Assuming that contact area, heat source power output, and thickness of the paste are constant, deltaT times the thermal conductivity of the paste remains constant. As thermal conductivity of the paste increases, the deltaT required to move the heat decreases. In the graph, the low deltaT is better.
HEATAny worklog of the girl in your avatar?
EBAY
Project Slumber Parties aka PSP Liquid Cooling Work Log
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks