The first review ASUS GTX 465 !!!

[bakalu]

Here I will compare the performance of ASUS GTX 465 and ASUS GTX 285 TOP

My system
CPU Core i7 Extreme 965 @ 3.6GHz
Mainboard ASUS Rampage II Gene
RAM 3x2GB DDR3
VGA ASUS GTX 465, ASUS GTX 285 TOP
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit RTM
Driver NVIDIA 257.15 beta 64bit

Crysis Warhead. 1680*1050, NoAA, Enthusiast DX10, ambush map

ASUS GTX 285 TOP


ASUS GTX 465


Call of Juarez DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X Multi_sampling, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP


ASUS GTX 465


S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP No Tessellation


ASUS GTX 465 Tessellation=ON


You see, the GTX465 is not entirely weaker than GTX285 TOP, just remember that this is the GTX285 TOP, core/shader/ memory 670/1550/1300 (default clock of the GTX285 is only 648/1476/1242)

Do you say that GTX465 is a less powerful than GTX275 ?

I have checked with stock fan, GTX465 activity was stable at core/memory 650/840. Room temp 30oC, fan set 87%

I use furmark to test the temperature of GTX465@650/840. Furmark run 20'



Temp Max 77oC
Source : http://forum.amtech.com.vn/overclock...gtx-465-a.html

------To be continued

[jaredpace]

Nice review, but slower in Warhead and 3 times faster in Stalker? Am I seeing that right?

[OCX600RR]

Nice review, but slower in Warhead and 3 times faster in Stalker? Am I seeing that right?

Seeing that as well..was questioning that in my head as well! And that's with Tessellation ON

[bakalu]

Nice review, but slower in Warhead and 3 times faster in Stalker? Am I seeing that right?

setting in Stalker

[prznar1]

2x gtx465 will be good. thx for tests

[bakalu]

I review GTX465 at default clock and overclock GTX465 core/memory 650/840

Demo benchmark Dirt 2. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=MEDIUM

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 9


ASUS GTX 465 DirectX 9


ASUS GTX 465 DirectX 11


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 9


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11


Benchmark Bad Company 2. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP

2010-05-25 18:57:15 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8695 - Time: 161628ms - Avg: 53.796 - Min: 38 - Max: 88

ASUS GTX 465 DirectX 11

2010-05-25 18:14:36 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8577 - Time: 171133ms - Avg: 50.119 - Min: 38 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11

2010-05-27 08:27:34 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8405 - Time: 156023ms - Avg: 53.870 - Min: 40 - Max: 78

Benchmark Metro 2033. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, NoAA, AF=16X, Very High, PhysX=ON

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 9

2010-05-27 16:00:47 - metro2033
Frames: 6498 - Time: 223249ms - Avg: 29.107 - Min: 14 - Max: 56

ASUS GTX 465 DirectX 9

2010-05-27 09:04:54 - metro2033
Frames: 8281 - Time: 248076ms - Avg: 33.381 - Min: 15 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 9

2010-05-27 08:41:48 - metro2033
Frames: 8123 - Time: 234365ms - Avg: 34.660 - Min: 16 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 10

2010-05-27 16:07:33 - metro2033
Frames: 6323 - Time: 231673ms - Avg: 27.293 - Min: 15 - Max: 54

ASUS GTX 465 DirectX 10

2010-05-27 08:58:03 - metro2033
Frames: 6400 - Time: 227293ms - Avg: 28.157 - Min: 13 - Max: 58

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 10

2010-05-27 08:33:43 - metro2033
Frames: 6891 - Time: 230879ms - Avg: 29.847 - Min: 15 - Max: 64

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11

2010-05-27 08:49:10 - metro2033
Frames: 4943 - Time: 243604ms - Avg: 20.291 - Min: 11 - Max: 35

In Dirt2 and Bad Company 2, performance of GTX465 is on par with GTX285 TOP and better than GTX285 TOP in Metro 2033.

GTX465 can't play Metro 2033 DX11 at resolution 1680*1050.

....to be continued

[kaktus1907]

wow great stuff!!

i am dying to see how far can the GTX465 be overclocked.. can it reach 800mhz gpu speed like GTX470 ?

[Helloworld_98]

wow, did I read that right?

57.6fps to over 70fps from a 42MHz OC?

[ZL1Killa]

is this a SINGLE 465 benchmark or dual?

[Helloworld_98]

is this a SINGLE 465 benchmark or dual?

single

[bamtan2]

Nice review, but slower in Warhead and 3 times faster in Stalker? Am I seeing that right?

no, it is faster in crysis warhead. 2 fps slower average and 6 fps faster minimum = faster.

[Pekalion]

Actually, is better in all the test in minimum, wich is great, not for too far better, but something is something, and can be improved with new drivers.

Im also waiting to see the OC power of it! Have you tried some bigger OC and stable? Maybe 750Mhz at the core rock solid will be great

Amazing job sir!

[bakalu]

wow great stuff!!

i am dying to see how far can the GTX465 be overclocked.. can it reach 800mhz gpu speed like GTX470 ?

OC Max ASUS GTX 465 with stock fan



I'm testting stable ASUS GTX 465 at core/memory 700/925, will be reviewed soon.

[kaktus1907]

bakalu, Thank you very much

according to your results GTX465 wont be any near a fail card like HD5830.. and it can overclock like a charm

+%50 gpu +%20memory

last thing i want.. can you upload its bios? im curious to see does it work on gtx470 or gtx480..

[bakalu]

Update Result benchmark game of GTX465 @ 700/925

Crysis Warhead. 1680*1050, NoAA, Enthusiast DX10, ambush map

ASUS GTX 285 TOP


ASUS GTX 465 default


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Call of Juarez DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X Multi_sampling, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP


ASUS GTX 465 default


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP No Tessellation


ASUS GTX 465 default, Tessellation=ON


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840, Tessellation=ON


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, Tessellation=ON


Demo benchmark Dirt 2. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=MEDIUM

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 9


ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 9


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 9


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 9


ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 11


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 11


Benchmark Bad Company 2. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP

2010-05-25 18:57:15 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8695 - Time: 161628ms - Avg: 53.796 - Min: 38 - Max: 88

ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 11

2010-05-25 18:14:36 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8577 - Time: 171133ms - Avg: 50.119 - Min: 38 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11

2010-05-27 08:27:34 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8405 - Time: 156023ms - Avg: 53.870 - Min: 40 - Max: 78

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 11

2010-05-28 14:20:58 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9406 - Time: 159798ms - Avg: 58.862 - Min: 44 - Max: 81

Benchmark Metro 2033. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, NoAA, AF=16X, Very High, PhysX=ON

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 9

2010-05-27 16:00:47 - metro2033
Frames: 6498 - Time: 223249ms - Avg: 29.107 - Min: 14 - Max: 56

ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 9

2010-05-27 09:04:54 - metro2033
Frames: 8281 - Time: 248076ms - Avg: 33.381 - Min: 15 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 9

2010-05-27 08:41:48 - metro2033
Frames: 8123 - Time: 234365ms - Avg: 34.660 - Min: 16 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 9

2010-05-28 14:42:53 - metro2033
Frames: 8827 - Time: 235842ms - Avg: 37.428 - Min: 17 - Max: 76

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 10

2010-05-27 16:07:33 - metro2033
Frames: 6323 - Time: 231673ms - Avg: 27.293 - Min: 15 - Max: 54

ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 10

2010-05-27 08:58:03 - metro2033
Frames: 6400 - Time: 227293ms - Avg: 28.157 - Min: 13 - Max: 58

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 10

2010-05-27 08:33:43 - metro2033
Frames: 6891 - Time: 230879ms - Avg: 29.847 - Min: 15 - Max: 64

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 10

2010-05-28 14:28:09 - metro2033
Frames: 7585 - Time: 228995ms - Avg: 33.123 - Min: 16 - Max: 70

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11

2010-05-27 08:49:10 - metro2033
Frames: 4943 - Time: 243604ms - Avg: 20.291 - Min: 11 - Max: 35

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 11

2010-05-28 14:36:06 - metro2033
Frames: 5128 - Time: 231864ms - Avg: 22.116 - Min: 13 - Max: 38

GTX465 runs very stable at core/memory of GTX480. . I use furmark to test the temperature of GTX465@700/925. Furmark run 26'. Room temp 30oC, fan set 87%



Max Temp 79oC.

.......to be continued

[BulldogPO]

Would be tons of better to read if you would use graphs instead of those big and messy screenshots.

[Smartidiot89]

Sorry for threadcrapping but Xtremely slow load time on those pictures... Can you possibly measure how much the card draws compared to GTX285 from the wall?

[Spectrobozo]

thanks for the tests, interesting results, this cards is looking quite good.

I made quickly these graphs

[Jowy Atreides]

This card actually looks pretty decent, if it isn't expensive.

Hopefully the 8800 effect will mean some aggressively clocked versions on the next die shrink

[WaterFlex]

thx for the review

[prznar1]

bakalu, give us some shots of card itself

[Eastcoasthandle]

Nice review, but slower in Warhead and 3 times faster in Stalker? Am I seeing that right?

It looks to me this is the direct result of driver level optimizations. Perhaps the OP needs to do all his test using High Quality Texture Filtering and removing any other optimizations so that these type of inconsistencies don't happen.

[bakalu]

thanks for the tests, interesting results, this cards is looking quite good.

I made quickly these graphs

thank you very much.

bakalu, give us some shots of card itself

Some pictures of ASUS GTX 465













Compare the length of the GTX465 and the other VGAs. ASUS GTX 285 TOP (top), ASUS GTX 480 (between) and ASUS GTX 465 (bottom)

[eva2000]

thanks for the info - awesome indeed

[snoro]

Pretty nice, thats exactly the same heatsink as the ref gtx470 so temp should be lower than a gtx 470.