Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: SB850 Very Poor RAID Performance

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    338

    SB850 Very Poor RAID Performance

    Ive been using one Super Talent Ultradrive GX 64gb SSD in AHCI, and was getting 225Mb/s average. Added a second one, did a fresh install (used sanitary erase to wipe them) set stripe size to 128k, dissabled drive indexing and super fetch, enabled write caching and NCQ. Im getting about 145Mb/s average now. With no tweaks I got about the same.

    RAID0 (before tweaks)


    Single
    Heatware Cecil

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    676
    you might want to go over this thread, it might give you some tips .

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    338
    Quote Originally Posted by onex View Post
    you might want to go over this thread, it might give you some tips .
    I saw that thread, didnt really see much that I didnt do.

    However, I see now hdtune is a bad bench to use, running other ones show about 375 reads, 250 writes, which is still pretty poor.



    Tried increasing SB voltage to 1.15 from 1.1,
    Last edited by Cecil; 04-22-2010 at 03:30 PM.
    Heatware Cecil

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Athens -> Hellas
    Posts
    944
    Edit: Not functioning well in the morning.......So m/b is the ASUS M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3...

    Which raid drivers did you use & which firmware do the SuperTalents have ?
    Last edited by felix_w; 04-22-2010 at 11:42 PM.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    513
    Have you downloaded and installed RAIDXpert? You need it to activate NCQ for RAID. Pretty retarded of AMD to make it that way IMO.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kirghudu, Cowjackingstan
    Posts
    462
    Quote Originally Posted by Cecil View Post
    I saw that thread, didnt really see much that I didnt do.
    Not sure if you are on XP or not.

    1. If not 7 or Vista - you need to manually align partition
    2. C1E and C&Q off
    3. SATA3 off
    4. 8.71 chipset, AHCI and RAID drivers
    5. NCQ on in RAIDXpert
    6. Write back caching on
    7. Buffer flushing off

    You will still not see linear scaling as on ICH10R which is one of the best $/performance controllers out there.

    Sony KDL40 // ASRock P67 Extreme4 1.40 // Core i5 2500K //
    G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 4x2Gb // HD6950 2GB // Intel Gigabit CT PCIe //
    M-Audio Delta 2496 // Crucial-M4 128Gb // Hitachi 2TB // TRUE-120 //
    Antec Quattro 850W // Antec 1200 // Win7 64 bit

  7. #7
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Unfortunately, AMD have traditionally been bad at making RAID controllers. What I suggest is, as you won't see a noticable difference between a single drive and two in RAID while doing day to day tasks, is just enjoy the extra storage you have on the volume
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    676
    p.s - did you try going for 64KB stripes?
    maybe a driver issue..

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •