MMM
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Ubuntu 9.1 & BOINC

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    4,162

    Ubuntu 9.1 & BOINC

    I have tried to get BOINC running on Ubuntu 9.10 with several problems. I have tried 6.4.5 installed thru the package manager and downloading 6.10.17 from the Boinc web site.

    This is what I get with 6.10.17:
    App version unsupported platform i686-pc-linux-gnu
    No application found for task i686-pc-linux-gnu

    uname -a says 2.6.31-14-generic


    With 6.4.5:
    Won't connect to locahost unless I run sudo boincmgr
    Downloads files then disconnects from localhost and won't reconnect.

    There have been other problems but those I have solved. Never had issues before and now nothing but problems.

  2. #2
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    You didn't download the 64bit version of BOINC by chance? You need Ubuntu 9.10 64bit to run that.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    4,162
    it is 64 Ubuntu, double checked.

    Am re-installing again, did not think that 8 cores needs more disk space for crunching than 4 cores. So giving the whole disk to Ubuntu.

    Will try downloading the 32bit Linux Boinc.

    At one point 6.4.5 installed thru package manager was using /usr/bin for data???? This has been a weird software day.

    One problem was certificates had to download a *.crt file and replace one distributed with files.
    Last edited by PoppaGeek; 12-14-2009 at 10:48 PM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    Strange, I just got my 16 core opty running about a week ago. Only problem I had was the certificate. Using 6.4.5 running on 64 bit ubuntu 9.1 . If I hear /see anything I'll let you know.

  5. #5
    Wuf
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    2,400
    Don't install boinc using package manager, it breaks something from ubuntu installion, i'd recommemd this:
    Reinstall ubuntu and use the tar package from boincs website
    You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet
    [22:53:09] [@Jaco-XS] i'm gonna overclock this damn box!
    Ze gear:
    Main rig: W3520 + 12GB ddr3 + Gigabyte X58A-UD3R rev2.0! + HD7970 + HD6350 DMS59 + HX520 + 2x X25-E 32gig R0 + Bunch of HDDs.
    ESXI: Dell C6100 XS23-TY3 Node - 1x L5630 + 24GB ECC REG + Brocade 1020 10GbE
    ZFS Server: Supermicro 826E1 + Supermicro X8DAH+-F + 1x L5630 + 24GB ECC REG + 10x 3TB HDDs + Brocade 1020 10GbE
    Lappy!: Lenovo Thinkpad W500: T9600 + 8GB + FireGL v5700 + 128GB Samsung 830 + 320GB 2.5" in ze dvd slot + 1920x1200 @ 15.4"


  6. #6
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    Maybe this is why I didn't experience any problems, I used Apt-get from the terminal.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    4,162
    I have tried doing it all ways and have re-installed 3 times now. 32 files will not run. 64 bit WCG says not compatible.

    Going to try 8.10

    Thanks for all the suggestions. Really frustrated. Stupid problems that do not seem to make sense. I have used both before on other machiens and no problems.

    Google searches are not helping except for the certificate thing.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    The only other thing I've found is "make sure you're downloading the boinc-client" in addition to the manager. I assumed you did that though, sorry I can't help much.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    4,162
    apt-get got it.

    thanks all

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    67
    Hi,

    To run 32bit apps (wcg_hcc1_img_6.03_i686-pc-linux-gnu for example) on 64bit linux u need to have libc6-i386 installed.

    So fire up terminal
    log-in as root (in ubuntu: sudo -i )
    aptitude install libc6-i386
    (aptitude is prefered over apt-get on Debian/Ubuntu for some time)

    then you can install boinc from ubuntu repos:
    aptitude install boinc-manager
    You can also install schedtool (it alters process scheduling on linux)

    The ca-certificates error is probably Ubuntu's fault
    Core2 Q9550 | P5Q Deluxe | 4x 2GB Corsair Dominator 1066MHz | TT Frio | AMD Radeon HD6970 | 4x 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F1


  11. #11
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    4,162
    Everything is working fine now but this is useful information. Thank you.

    I am thinking of installing 9.10 on 2 1354s running 8.4 so I may need to try it this way. Others may as well.

  12. #12
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    Quote Originally Posted by Havis View Post
    Hi,

    To run 32bit apps (wcg_hcc1_img_6.03_i686-pc-linux-gnu for example) on 64bit linux u need to have libc6-i386 installed.

    So fire up terminal
    log-in as root (in ubuntu: sudo -i )
    aptitude install libc6-i386
    (aptitude is prefered over apt-get on Debian/Ubuntu for some time)

    then you can install boinc from ubuntu repos:
    aptitude install boinc-manager
    You can also install schedtool (it alters process scheduling on linux)

    The ca-certificates error is probably Ubuntu's fault
    Very good ... except apt-get is the common and preferred method in Ubuntu, as is not logging in as root. In fact you are actively discouraged from ever logging in as root in Ubuntu.
    Your command should read: sudo apt-get install libc6-i386

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    67
    aptitude is prefered over apt-get in Debian for some time, because
    it has better dependency handling when removing packages.

    I'm not so sure about Ubuntu, but I've found this link:
    http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/4935/

    more on package management tools can be found here:
    http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkgtools.en.html

    with sudo vs root acc, it's basically the same:
    with great power comes great responsibility
    Personally, I preffer root, because I don't have to type "sudo"
    before each command.
    Last edited by Havis; 12-18-2009 at 04:26 AM.
    Core2 Q9550 | P5Q Deluxe | 4x 2GB Corsair Dominator 1066MHz | TT Frio | AMD Radeon HD6970 | 4x 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F1


  14. #14
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    The "ubuntu way" (I don't always do this myself, either) is to use sudo before each root command as it makes it less easy for newbies to royally screw their system with only a few keystrokes. With sudo it takes an extra 5. Yeah I know, whoopty-doo. 5 keystrokes extra, all of which can be automatic after a while, but there's also no chance of forgetting that you're root and going to, say, clear your home directory with "rm * -R" (stupid thing to do anyway but ...) The last time someone went on the Ubuntu forums and told people (who were directly asking btw) how to log in as root, their posts were deleted and they got banned from the forum ... which is ridiculous, but it happened.
    (I use root when I compile my kernels to save typing sudo all the time and because I use a couple of extra commands that don't "stick" if you run them with sudo ie environment variables).
    Ubuntu does do some things that are ... well ... very Ubuntu. The placement of files for user software often doesn't follow linux conventions, drive naming in GRUB is ... screwy (never mind all the automatic stuff in boot.list in Ubuntu 9.10) ... there's a bunch of extra proprietary options slipped into the kernel (which lags behind the stable release) just to name a couple of things.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •