XtremeSystems Forums

Go Back   XtremeSystems Forums > Xtreme > Xtreme News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-22-2009, 04:54 PM   #1
AzraelDarkangel
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
AzraelDarkangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: stuck in Bloomington, IN right now
Posts: 794
Send a message via Yahoo to AzraelDarkangel
Lucid Hydra 200: Vendor Agnostic Multi-GPU, Available in 30 Days

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3646

Quote:
A year ago Lucid announced the Hydra 100: a physical chip that could enable hardware multi-GPU without any pesky SLI/Crossfire software, game profiles or anything like that.

At a high level what Lucid's technology does is intercept OpenGL/DirectX commands from the CPU to the GPU and load balance them across any number of GPUs. The final buffers are read back by the Lucid chip and sent to primary GPU for display.

The technology sounds flawless. You don't need to worry about game profiles or driver support, you just add more GPUs and they should be perfectly load balanced. Even more impressive is Lucid's claim that you can mix and match GPUs of different performance levels. For example you could put a GeForce GTX 285 and a GeForce 9800 GTX in parallel and the two would be perfectly load balanced by Lucid's hardware; you'd get a real speedup. Eventually, Lucid will also enable multi-GPU configurations from different vendors (e.g. one NVIDIA GPU + one AMD GPU).
__________________
DistroWatch - find your flavor of Linux
Petra's Tech Shop - for all your watercooling needs
AzraelDarkangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 05:03 PM   #2
apt403
Xtreme Member
 
apt403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 228
Wow, it's been ages since the first press release came out. I figured this thing would never materialize.
__________________
iPOS
apt403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 05:10 PM   #3
Chumbucket843
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Chumbucket843's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Mt. pleasant, SC
Posts: 906
the rebirth of the coprocessor. you gotta love it.


$36 a chip are you for rizzle?
Chumbucket843 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 05:48 PM   #4
G0ldBr1ck
Xtreme PhenomII Addict
 
G0ldBr1ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Birmingham AL.
Posts: 1,017
Send a message via MSN to G0ldBr1ck
been saving this quote for quite a while. Im gonna have to break it out now just as he said to do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GAR View Post
You can QUOTE me on this, THIS WILL NEVER BE A SUCCESS. As a matter of fact this will never even be mass produced. I say it will dissapear from the face of this world very shortly.
__________________
Quote:
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
G0ldBr1ck is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 05:49 PM   #5
Mechromancer
Xtreme Addict
 
Mechromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,026
Send a message via ICQ to Mechromancer Send a message via AIM to Mechromancer Send a message via Yahoo to Mechromancer
Quote:
Originally Posted by G0ldBr1ck View Post
been saving this quote for quite a while. Im gonna have to break it out now just as he said to do.
It seems GAR underestimated the power of Intel.

Let me be the first to add the obligatory "Now pair this with two AMD 5870 GPUs" remark. Lucid+AMD+Intel = Menage a tois of PWNAGE.
__________________
Phenom II 940 @3.2Ghz 1.35v(CACVC AC 0849GPAW)| NB@2.4Ghz 1.3v| 4GB Corsair Dominator@1066mhz 5-5-5-15-22-2T 2.1v + 4GB OCZ Reaper 1066 kits| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe 1001 BIOS| Coolermaster Hyper 212 | PCP&C Silencer 750w | Diamond HD 4870 512mb | Fatality X-Fi | Areca ARC-1210 + RAID0 4xOCZ Solid Series 30GB SSDs | RAID0 2xWD 750GB Caviar Blacks |TV Wonder HD 650 PCIe

Quote:
Originally Posted by phelan1777 View Post
Hail fellow warrior albeit a surat Mercenary. I Hail to you from the Clans, Ghost Bear that is (Yes freebirth we still do and shall always view mercenaries with great disdain!) I have long been an honorable warrior of the mighty Warden Clan Ghost Bear the honorable Bekker surname. I salute your tenacity to show your freebirth sibkin their ignorance!
Mechromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 06:05 PM   #6
Xoulz
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Xoulz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mi
Posts: 603
Finally..!




Been waiting on more info about the MSI's Big Bang and Lucid's Hydra chip...

What more needs to be said, no more SLI... and this:




From the moment I heard about this technology and Company (15 months ago), I've been a close follower. Just looking at the people who are on the board @ Lucid gave me hope this Hydra chip was for real.

I can't wait for the bench reviews, but this looks pleasing..
__________________
Violence does not solve social problems.

Quote:
"The implications, if this actually works as advertised are insane." (HYDRA chip from Lucid)

-Derek Wilson, Anandtech
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
ah thanks w1z. "magic smoke" lol.

The VAPORS!
Xoulz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 06:16 PM   #7
Chumbucket843
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Chumbucket843's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Mt. pleasant, SC
Posts: 906
this is multi-gpu blasphemy!!
Chumbucket843 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 06:20 PM   #8
cegras
Xtreme Addict
 
cegras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,292
I wonder if there will be any appreciable latency with an added middleman chip?
__________________
E7200 ; 4870 1GB
cegras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 06:25 PM   #9
LC_Nab
Xtreme Member
 
LC_Nab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bayamon,PR
Posts: 200
Send a message via MSN to LC_Nab
Mmmm , No love for AMD boards eh ? T_T
__________________
LC_Nab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 07:12 PM   #10
Mechromancer
Xtreme Addict
 
Mechromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,026
Send a message via ICQ to Mechromancer Send a message via AIM to Mechromancer Send a message via Yahoo to Mechromancer
Quote:
Originally Posted by LC_Nab View Post
Mmmm , No love for AMD boards eh ? T_T
+1

Lucid has to get these on AMD boards of we'll cry "bloody murder!" Intel has their fingers in Lucid, but I hope they wouldn't deprive AMD users of this man-made miracle.

I don't think computing life will ever be the same after this. Today has been a momentous day in the world of hardware betweem AMD's 5870, Lucid's Hydra, and Intel's IDF. I will sleep with a smile on my face.
__________________
Phenom II 940 @3.2Ghz 1.35v(CACVC AC 0849GPAW)| NB@2.4Ghz 1.3v| 4GB Corsair Dominator@1066mhz 5-5-5-15-22-2T 2.1v + 4GB OCZ Reaper 1066 kits| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe 1001 BIOS| Coolermaster Hyper 212 | PCP&C Silencer 750w | Diamond HD 4870 512mb | Fatality X-Fi | Areca ARC-1210 + RAID0 4xOCZ Solid Series 30GB SSDs | RAID0 2xWD 750GB Caviar Blacks |TV Wonder HD 650 PCIe

Quote:
Originally Posted by phelan1777 View Post
Hail fellow warrior albeit a surat Mercenary. I Hail to you from the Clans, Ghost Bear that is (Yes freebirth we still do and shall always view mercenaries with great disdain!) I have long been an honorable warrior of the mighty Warden Clan Ghost Bear the honorable Bekker surname. I salute your tenacity to show your freebirth sibkin their ignorance!
Mechromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 08:13 PM   #11
deathman20
Xtreme Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Where the Cheese Heads Reside
Posts: 1,950
Send a message via AIM to deathman20 Send a message via MSN to deathman20 Send a message via Yahoo to deathman20
Why would they need 2 VGA connectors hooked up?

BTW Thumbs up. Glad they moved forward with this, and im sure Intel is helping push this all the way as well.
__________________
-=The Gamer=-
EVGA X58 | i7 920 C0 (3841A578) @ 3.67Ghz w/ 1.14375V | 40C Idle / 66C Load (LinX)
6 Gig G.Skill PC3-12800 8-8-8-21 @ 1632Mhz w/ 1.6V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
EVGA GTX285 @ 702/1584/1404 | 36C Idle / 72C Load | 2x 80Gig Intel G2 SSD's
Modified Antec P180 Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
DFI LT LP X38-T2R | E1400 @ 2.0Ghz w/ 1.275V | 32C Idle / 48C Load (Normal Load)
2 Gig G.Skill PC2-8500 5-5-5-15 @ 800Mhz w/ 1.8V | Stock E8400 Heatsink w/ MX-2
ATI 4350 | 2x Seagate 320Gig | 2x WD Green 1TB | WD 160Gig External Offsite Backup
SilverStone Black LC10B-E Media Center | Corsair CMPSU-400CX
Heat
deathman20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 08:22 PM   #12
Computurd
Xtreme Member
 
Computurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 330
As i understand lucid is owned now by a subsidiary of intel, or at least funded by them indirectly somehow, which is great, because this is the best thing since the gpu!!!!
My next rig...
sandy bridge
sata 6gb/s ssd
AND lucid hydra, doesnt really matter which gpu now!
__________________
"Lurking" Since 1977
Computurd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:11 AM   #13
villa1n
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
villa1n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oslo
Posts: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
Finally..!




Been waiting on more info about the MSI's Big Bang and Lucid's Hydra chip...

What more needs to be said, no more SLI... and this:




From the moment I heard about this technology and Company (15 months ago), I've been a close follower. Just looking at the people who are on the board @ Lucid gave me hope this Hydra chip was for real.

I can't wait for the bench reviews, but this looks pleasing..
I m confused on the 4X the 8x pcie on a p55... since the cpu only has 16 pci-e lanes dedicated to gfx...but the hydra is issuing instructions via 32 lanes..?
__________________
Laptop For now. New Build soon



"This Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^
villa1n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:11 AM   #14
m0da
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
m0da's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 940
Send a message via AIM to m0da
Quote:
Originally Posted by villa1n View Post
I m confused on the 4X the 8x pcie on a p55... since the cpu only has 16 pci-e lanes dedicated to gfx...but the hydra is issuing instructions via 32 lanes..?
I think this quote from the article will help:

Quote:
And the highest end solution, the one being used on the MSI board, has a x16 to the CPU and then a configurable pair of x16s to GPUs. You can operate this controller in 4 x8 mode, 1 x16 + 2 x8 or 2 x16. It's all auto sensing and auto-configurable.
The way I read it is that the chip communicates with CPU with a single x16 lane; It subsequently communicates with the GPUs with a 4x8, 2x16, or 1x16 interface.

DAMN THIS IS COOL
__________________
m0da is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:16 AM   #15
villa1n
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
villa1n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oslo
Posts: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by m0da View Post
I think this quote from the article will help:



The way I read it is that the chip communicates with CPU with a single x16 lane; It subsequently communicates with the GPUs with a 4x8, 2x16, or 1x16 interface.

DAMN THIS IS COOL
I read that, but thats what i m asking, if it communicates to the cpu at pci-e 16... doesnt that necessarily limit the amount of instructions it can send to the gpus at 16lanes.. ie 1x16, 2x8, or 4x4?
__________________
Laptop For now. New Build soon



"This Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^
villa1n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 02:51 AM   #16
saaya
Xtreme X.I.P.
 
saaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 臺北 (Taipei)
Posts: 30,594
Send a message via MSN to saaya Send a message via Yahoo to saaya
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chumbucket843 View Post
the rebirth of the coprocessor. you gotta love it.
thats not really what this is... its a smart plx chip sortof... but i would not call it a co-processor...
__________________
.
Nvidia: Tesla C2050 and C2070 products (GT300) will retail for $2,499 and $3,999


JHH (Nvidia) sep 2009: The best way to always be the number1 is to have no backup plan link


Hail Voltage! The Solution to AND Source of all our Hardware Problems
saaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 03:01 AM   #17
zalbard
Xtreme Addict
 
zalbard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Russia (for now)
Posts: 1,806
Personally I don't think this will do any good for using similar cards compared to existing SLI and Crossfire. Using Radeon and GeForce cards at the same time... hmm, dunno, probably not worth it...
__________________
Donate to XS forums
>> Join Intel 4.5GHz LinX Stable Club <<
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechromancer View Post
Bulldozer can't show up fast enough either. Bulldozer better live up to THIS: Image
It will either make history or make AMD history if it doesn't. Intel's thread count is getting higher than Fugger's bed sheets!
Undergoing rebuild:
CPU: Core i7 920 (batch # 3910A732) | Heatsink: Prolimatech Megashadow | TIM: Indigo Xtreme | MB: EVGA Classified E760 | RAM: G.Skill Trident 3x2GB DD3-2000 | GFX: Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 1GB GDDR5 | HDD: Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB | SB: Auzentech X-Fi Forte | PSU: Corsair HX1000 | Case: open stand till Silverstone Raven RV02 arrives | Monitor: LG Flatron W2452T | Keyboard: Razer Lycosa Mirror Edition | Mouse: Logitech MX518 (screaming for an upgrade) | OS: Windows 7 x64 Professional
zalbard is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 03:16 AM   #18
Calmatory
Xtreme Addict
 
Calmatory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,601
Nvidia will disable the ability for this in their drivers, sooner or later.
Calmatory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:03 AM   #19
Xoulz
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Xoulz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mi
Posts: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by villa1n View Post
I read that, but thats what i m asking, if it communicates to the cpu at pci-e 16... doesnt that necessarily limit the amount of instructions it can send to the gpus at 16lanes.. ie 1x16, 2x8, or 4x4?
You are not going to saturate a PCIe x16 connection with a Hydra chip.


It's own technology talks to as many GPU as you want given those lanes... how the PCIe bus works doesn't change... thats the function of the Hydra chip. Seamless!
__________________
Violence does not solve social problems.

Quote:
"The implications, if this actually works as advertised are insane." (HYDRA chip from Lucid)

-Derek Wilson, Anandtech
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
ah thanks w1z. "magic smoke" lol.

The VAPORS!
Xoulz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 07:32 AM   #20
Mechromancer
Xtreme Addict
 
Mechromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,026
Send a message via ICQ to Mechromancer Send a message via AIM to Mechromancer Send a message via Yahoo to Mechromancer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
Nvidia will disable the ability for this in their drivers, sooner or later.
You're right. Sad thing is if Nvidia does this, they will undermine the adoption of their own tech. It will be a horrible business decision on their part.
__________________
Phenom II 940 @3.2Ghz 1.35v(CACVC AC 0849GPAW)| NB@2.4Ghz 1.3v| 4GB Corsair Dominator@1066mhz 5-5-5-15-22-2T 2.1v + 4GB OCZ Reaper 1066 kits| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe 1001 BIOS| Coolermaster Hyper 212 | PCP&C Silencer 750w | Diamond HD 4870 512mb | Fatality X-Fi | Areca ARC-1210 + RAID0 4xOCZ Solid Series 30GB SSDs | RAID0 2xWD 750GB Caviar Blacks |TV Wonder HD 650 PCIe

Quote:
Originally Posted by phelan1777 View Post
Hail fellow warrior albeit a surat Mercenary. I Hail to you from the Clans, Ghost Bear that is (Yes freebirth we still do and shall always view mercenaries with great disdain!) I have long been an honorable warrior of the mighty Warden Clan Ghost Bear the honorable Bekker surname. I salute your tenacity to show your freebirth sibkin their ignorance!
Mechromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 07:41 AM   #21
Xoulz
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Xoulz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mi
Posts: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
Nvidia will disable the ability for this in their drivers, sooner or later.
Really bro.. watch a few videos, or read some stuff. It's been mentioned that how it works, is agnostic to the OS and drivers.

Here: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=235138Video
__________________
Violence does not solve social problems.

Quote:
"The implications, if this actually works as advertised are insane." (HYDRA chip from Lucid)

-Derek Wilson, Anandtech
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
ah thanks w1z. "magic smoke" lol.

The VAPORS!
Xoulz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 07:58 AM   #22
jmke
Xtreme Addict
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: [M] - Belgium
Posts: 1,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
is agnostic to the OS and drivers.
that's what I thought too; there is a software side of things though which might be used to limit
__________________
Belgian Hardware Testers & Overclockers Wanted

Belgium's #1 Hardware Review Site and OC-Team!

support guru
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 08:11 AM   #23
Vinas
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Vinas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Detroit
Posts: 644
Just like the disablement of Physix when an ATi card is present in the system... But I hope they don't and if nvidia does I hope they're unsuccessful.
__________________

Intel i7 860 @ 4GHz
(^ 1.30vcore Linx Stable)
HIS ATi 5870 @ 1033/1350
Corsair Dominator 1600 CL7
Asus Maximus III GENE
Koolance 340WB
Intel x25-M SSD
DD GTS240
TT Lanbox
Vinas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:05 AM   #24
Kaldor
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechromancer View Post
You're right. Sad thing is if Nvidia does this, they will undermine the adoption of their own tech. It will be a horrible business decision on their part.
They already did this with crappy SLI chipsets on the 6XX and 7XX mobos. X58 is the best thing that ever happened to Nvidia honestly.

I hope it is a winner, however I buy my graphic cards in pairs. It will be interesting to see if there is any performance hit when using it with 2 of the same cards.
Kaldor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:12 AM   #25
SKYMTL
Xtreme Addict
 
SKYMTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,131
Send a message via MSN to SKYMTL
Guys, as has already been stated the Hydra operates independently from the OS and thus is not affected by drivers or at least not much anyways. As such, Nvidia / ATI cannot block it on the software side of things. They may be able to limit it however. At least this is how it works to my understanding.

Last edited by SKYMTL; 09-23-2009 at 09:14 AM.
SKYMTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XtremeSystems