DFI X58-T3EH8 + Pcmark05 = 30K broken!

[eva2000]

Seems Futuremark doesn't like it when SSD raid 0 is working well as trying to submit my Pcmark05 score I get unable to upload result due to systeminfo corruption - which it definitely is not !

System specs

• Intel Core i7 920 3836A756
• Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme + LGA1366 Bolt Thru kit + 2x 120x38mm Scythe UltraKaze 2000rpm 87cfm fans in push/pull
• DFI LP UT X58-T3EH8 R.A51 - 12/31 bios
• HIS HD4870x2 CAT 8.11 Hotfix (Vista)
• 2x1GB Cellshock PC3-14400 (Micron D9GTR) + 1GB OCZ PC3-14400 Platinum (Micron D9GTR)
• Ram cooling: 3x 60x25mm Sunon 23.5cfm Maglev fans
• 750GB Samsung HD753LJ
• 4x32GB OCZ Core V1 SSD Raid 0 + Highpoint RR3520LF PCI-E Raid controller 256MB Cache
• Pioneer DVD-RW
• 1KW Corsair HX1000 psu
• Vista Ultimate SP2 Beta 64bit vLite'd

Click image for FULL LARGE screenshot

[chispy]

congrats George amazing score , keep up the good work and keep pushing it

[Peakr]

I wonder if it has anything to do with Vista SP2?

[eva2000]

congrats George amazing score , keep up the good work and keep pushing it

thanks...

I wonder if it has anything to do with Vista SP2?

could be, or futuremark blocking abnormally high drive bench results ?

Emailed FM to see what's what

[massman]

Keep us updated eva

[kenofstephen]

4x32GB OCZ Core V1 SSD Raid 0

OR

1x INTEL SSD

is faster??

should be 4x OCZ SSD right??

[carpo93]

it's faster than i-ram raid
and it has more gb, so it can be used in daily

[ReverendMaynard]

Nice eva. Just goes to show that PCMark is now useless. That score is increased by 100% over what it would be without those drives.

[AndreYang]

FM cannot approve XP Startup 230+ MB/S

[eva2000]

Got a reply from FM and it seems there's a chance it will go through. Will do what they suggest later today with a rerun (might as well as above you can see the 2D windows test is quite low).

Hello,

Thank you for contacting Futuremark. This error may be due to outdated Futuremark systeminfo software. I suggest updating your software by running VirtualMark off of our website and accepting the download/install of more recent systeminfo software.

http://service.futuremark.com/virtualmark/start.action

This will most likely solve your problem.

Regards,
Trevor

So tried run Virtualmark and install the prompted software first and got Virtualmark of 26,000



This time split my 4x32GB SSD Raid 0 into 2 partitions of equal size M and N drive and then did a Pcmark05 run and got much higher startup scores but 1/6th the speed in General HDD

Unfortunately, still get systeminfo corrupted message on submission page





Then ran Pcmark05 again but off 2nd SSD partition on N drive and got a nice boost

[ReverendMaynard]

Still amazing eva. The throughput on those drives is just silly lol. I need a few

[dinos22]

great find george

now lets hope futuremark people will finally decide to differentiate between RAMdrives and SSD/iRAM and allow such scores

or raise the limit to a higher number than 220 XP startup