07-14-2008, 05:46 AM
|
#1
|
|
Xtreme Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,688
|
Microstuttering tests on ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Hi,
I'm working with full article of microstuttering issue including tests in Crysis and Race Driver: GRID with ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2, ATI Radeon HD 4870 CrossFireX, ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 and GeForce 9800 GX2.
Article will be published on Finnish hardware and overclocking site Muropaketti.com and translated to English.
Here is a sneak peak of what to expect:
I'm also waiting answers from AMD regarding this issue which I'll update to the article later.
-----------
Update:
Here are charts showing the difference between frametimes with ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2, 4870 CrossFireX and single 4870 in Race Driver: GRID:
And GeForce 9800 GX2 and GeForce 9800 GX2 in single GPU mode:
Still waiting input from ATI for my questions about microstuttering.
---
Update 2
Ok here is a short explanation about testing methods and graphs:
First of all, I'm using Race Driver: GRID demo and CrossFire and 9800 GX2 seem to work just FINE. With 1920x1200 resolution, 4xAA and 16xAF I get 66,9 FPS with single 4870, 73,4 FPS with 4870 CF and 75,6 FPS with 4870 X2:
(Red bar keskimääräinen is average FPS)
Second, the graphs I've showed here related to microstutterin ARE NOT intended to display performance but difference between frame rendering times. I have only recorded 2 seconds of gameplay and used first 30 frames from data.
If performance is 60 FPS.. that would mean graphics card renders 120 frames in 2 seconds. Since I have only used 30 frames to analyze the results and draw the graphs, it means gameplay of half a second (0,5s, 500 ms)!!! That's not enough to draw conclusion about perfromance...
... it might not be enough to draw conclusion about microstuttering either but in my own tests 30 frames already show clear pattern with ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 and rendering problem where every other frame is being rendered after different time than every other.
Last edited by Sampsa; 07-15-2008 at 04:50 AM.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 05:55 AM
|
#2
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: istanbul turkey
Posts: 1,514
|
nice test
and nice to see average for new ati cards is nearly 2.5ms maybe less as seen on the graph .
__________________

When i'm being paid i always do my job through.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 05:58 AM
|
#3
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bulgaria, Varna
Posts: 280
|
Wow!
3870X2 is bumping the frames like mad! That would be awful feeling, especially in a fast racing game.
I wonder, can this behavior be demonstrated properly on a video record w/ FRAPS?
__________________
Q9450 @ 8*475MHz (Zalman CNPS-9700) :: DFI LANParty UT P45-T2RS :: 2*2GB G.Skill F2-8800CL5 @ 1141MHz (5-5-5-15-PL7) :: WD VelociRaptor 300GB :: Sapphire HD 5870 :: CHIEFTEC 850W :: Win7 x86
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 05:58 AM
|
#4
|
|
Xtreme Cruncher
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 7,750
|
So 4870X2 card doesnt hold any "microshutter" advantage.
__________________
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:04 AM
|
#5
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,195
|
These tests are being done with a fast processor? One of the theories/thoughts put forwards has been that a processor that's "too fast" will contribute to the microstuttering, since the GPU's get information too quickly.
Looking at that graph, the worst offender is also the slowest card by a noticeable margin. A faster graphics card(s) would process the given information faster, reducing the tendency for the frames to appear vastly out of sync.
__________________
i7 920 | Foxconn Bloodrage | GTX280 | Corsair DDR3-1600 2x3GB
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:13 AM
|
#6
|
|
Xtreme Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MpG
These tests are being done with a fast processor? One of the theories/thoughts put forwards has been that a processor that's "too fast" will contribute to the microstuttering, since the GPU's get information too quickly.
Looking at that graph, the worst offender is also the slowest card by a noticeable margin. A faster graphics card(s) would process the given information faster, reducing the tendency for the frames to appear vastly out of sync.
|
Done with Intel Core 2 Duo E8500.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:14 AM
|
#7
|
|
Xtreme Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 892
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MpG
These tests are being done with a fast processor? One of the theories/thoughts put forwards has been that a processor that's "too fast" will contribute to the microstuttering, since the GPU's get information too quickly.
|
I guess that's where the 'smoothness' of the Phenom comes from.
(sorry, couldn't resist, disclaimer: I have three AMD processors)
In any case, didn't expect anything better, and won't be going multi-GPU any time soon..
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:19 AM
|
#8
|
|
Xtreme Supporter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 271
|
Seeing as how vsync apparently fixes a lot of (if not all?) of microstuttering, I would like to see more multi GPU graphics compairisons with vsync enabled in order to see which graphics cards can keep a higher minimum frame rate. Vsync makes for an overall more enjoyable play experience...except in twitch shooters or other games when reaction time is more important, as it causes input delay.
__________________
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:21 AM
|
#9
|
|
Xtreme Mentor
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,793
|
Test needs to include dual 4870X2s and also a single GPU configuration for comparison. Otherwise, great results, it appears that CF micro stuttering has been reduced to nil with the HD4000 series.
__________________
Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
—Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:21 AM
|
#10
|
|
Xtreme Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Istantinople
Posts: 895
|
Vsync is not good in multi GPU due to the lack of triple buffering.
__________________
Quote:
|
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
|
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // HIS HD5870 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:21 AM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 90
|
The graph should really begin at what is labeled 'Frame 2'; there is no data before that.
Did you test a single card also? The addition of a control would make the lower end of the data set more meaningful.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
XS is all about overkill.
whats the point of being some place called "Xtreme" if you dont indulge in the overkill aspect of things.
|
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:21 AM
|
#12
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: EvE-Online, Tranquility
Posts: 1,979
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowman
I guess that's where the 'smoothness' of the Phenom comes from.
(sorry, couldn't resist, disclaimer: I have three AMD processors)
|
 , nice joke though  .
Anyhow, I would have expected they fixed microstuttering really. If they wouldnt have fixed it I think they would have let down quite some customers despite the performance.
__________________
Synaptic Overflow
CPU:
-Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
--CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
Motherboard:
-Foxconn Bloodrage P06
--Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
Graphics:
-Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
--GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
RAM:
-3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
--Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
Storage:
-3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
--2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
PSU:
-Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
OS:
-Windows Vista Business x64
ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:23 AM
|
#13
|
|
Xtreme Mentor
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,793
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hu1kamania
Seeing as how vsync apparently fixes a lot of (if not all?) of microstuttering
|
It also inherently introduces mouse lag simply by the way it works, and this is easily noticeable in fast paced FPS games such as UT2004.
__________________
Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
—Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:26 AM
|
#14
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 344
|
Strange results... Only the 3870 X2 suffers from any significant microstutter.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:29 AM
|
#15
|
|
Xtreme Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 996
|
Interesting, so reading the graphs it suggests that the HD4000 series cards have improved greatly on Micrstuttering over the previous generation of cards, and that SLi (on the 9800 GX2) is a shade worse than the 4000 series but nowhere near as bad as the 3000 series Microstutter!
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:30 AM
|
#16
|
|
Xtreme Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Istantinople
Posts: 895
|
Oh.
DAMN SLI.
I just moved to a 4870 from a 8800GT SLI setup. In Crysis, the framerates are lower. THE GAME IS MUCH SMOOTHER. THE CONTROLS ARE DEAD ACCURATE. Even 25FPS could be considered playable whereas in SLI controls sucked below 40FPS
Damn ME if I ever buy a SLI or CF system again.
__________________
Quote:
|
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
|
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // HIS HD5870 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:36 AM
|
#17
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 275
|
So let me get this correct; singel GPUs has perfect frame sync? Like a new frame every X.ms?
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:38 AM
|
#18
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 344
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eson
So let me get this correct; singel GPUs has perfect frame sync? Like a new frame every X.ms?
|
No they do not, but they are pretty close to it. It all depends upon the scene and what is to be rendered.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:39 AM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 48
|
The 4870x2 have sealed its place in my checkbook
Thanks very much
__________________
Thermaltake Armor+ Tower >> 1200W Xigmatek PSU
|| ASUS R.F. X48 ATX || QX9770 > Thermalright 120 Ultra Xtreme ||
|| HIS HD4870x2 (unlocked, but not OC'd yet)|| X-Fi Elite Pro || 4GB mushkin DDR2 1066
Stuck with my dv1000
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:39 AM
|
#20
|
|
Grrrrrrrrrr
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Finland, Eura
Posts: 1,590
|
Sampsa, did you test HD3870 X2 with same driver version also?
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:39 AM
|
#21
|
|
Xtreme Supporter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
It also inherently introduces mouse lag simply by the way it works, and this is easily noticeable in fast paced FPS games such as UT2004.
|
Yeah, thats was what I meant when I said it causes input delay.
__________________
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:40 AM
|
#22
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnZS
Interesting, so reading the graphs it suggests that the HD4000 series cards have improved greatly on Micrstuttering over the previous generation of cards, and that SLi (on the 9800 GX2) is a shade worse than the 4000 series but nowhere near as bad as the 3000 series Microstutter!
|
Being second last place in this case doesn't give it any awards. If anything it means that 8800GT/GTS/98GTX SLI is probably as bad.
If it's noticable in high res that the cards are supposed to play at (3870X2, 9800GX2) it sucks. No passing through that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ
I think that 95% of Mac owners were shaken as children.
|
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:52 AM
|
#23
|
|
Xtreme Guru
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,814
|
Quote:
|
Damn ME if I ever buy a SLI or CF system again.
|
...so im not the only one who was turned off? thought i was alone there...
Quote:
|
singel GPUs has perfect frame sync?
|
what's to sync? it only has one gpu
to sync or not to sync. that is the question.
can cf run well with vsync off?
__________________
 q9550@3.75GHz|GTX295[SOLD]|4x2GBDDR2|P5Q-Pro|640GB WD X2|Vista 32+64 dual boot|BenQ G2420
Last edited by adamsleath; 07-14-2008 at 06:57 AM.
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:57 AM
|
#24
|
|
Xtreme Supporter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by annihilat0r
Vsync is not good in multi GPU due to the lack of triple buffering.
|
It may not be optimal, but what is the harm?
__________________
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:57 AM
|
#25
|
|
Xtreme Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 793
|
Can't wait to see the full article!
__________________
Rig Specs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 4.0ghz 1.37v - DFI Lanparty UT P35 TR2 - 4x1GB Team Xtreem DDR2-1066 - Palit 8800GT Sonic 512MB GDDR3 256-bit
160GB Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM SATA II 8MB Cache - 320GB Western Digital Caviar 7200RPM SATA II 16MB Cache - Liteon 18X DVD-Writer /w LS
640GB Western Digital SE16 7200RPM SATA II 16MB Cache - Corsair HX 620W Modular PSU - Cooler Master Stacker 832
Auzen 7.1 X-Plosion - Zalman ZM-DS4F - Sennheiser HD212 Pro - Edifier M2600
Custom Water Cooling
Dtek Fusion Extreme CPU Block - Swiftech MCR-220 - Swiftech MCP655-B - Swiftech MCRES-MICRO Reservior - 7/16" ID x 5/8" OD Tubings
Dual Thermaltake A2018s 120mm Blue LED Smart fans.
www.mni-photography.site88.net
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 PM.
|