GTX 280 is three times faster in F@H than HD 3870 and five times faster than PS3.
Source (a reliable Turkish news editor):
http://forum.donanimhaber.com/m_23433606/tm.htm
GTX 280 is three times faster in F@H than HD 3870 and five times faster than PS3.
Source (a reliable Turkish news editor):
http://forum.donanimhaber.com/m_23433606/tm.htm
- ABIT-IP35
- C2Q Q6600@3.33Ghz@Swiftech Apogee GT
- Palit GTX460 768mb@Swiftech MCW60@1000mhz-1.212v
- Kingston 3gb 800mhz
- Alphacool NexXxoS Xtreme III Rev.2 360mm
- CM Stacker 830
- Samsung 2233BW 22'' TFT
- Creative X-Fi Xtrememusic
- Gigaworks Progamer G500
F@H supported on Nvidia Cards?
Btw link doesn't work for me , its an empty page ;/
That's my distorted picture!![]()
The original can be found over at a certain site which reported about NVIDIA F@H client, but fumbled with the pictures. I didn't want to rat them out, but it still interesting news...
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7777.html
//AndreasGeForce GTX 280 is going to be a mighty beast. The GT200 core impressed us from the very beginning in matters of raw performance. Alas there have been little information on the real-life performance of the card, other than statements that it runs Crysis fine at certain settings and that it scores 7000 points in the Vantage Extreme profile. We've been provided some more solid information based on the performance in Stanford's Folding@Home client. A slide recently presented says that GeForce GTX 280 will be capable of folding slightly more than 500 mol/day, which is three times more than what Radeon HD 3870 can do, about 170 mol/day (according to the slide), or five times more than PlayStation 3; 100 mol/day.
The picture and angle it was taken from has been altered from the original
Try Again, it's working now
We do have a thread about this very topic: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=188726&page=1
And my setup can still take it.
4xOCed 3850 in CrossFireX will still outperform that.
But, I bought mine for games, so I'll just enjoy it for that.
- ABIT-IP35
- C2Q Q6600@3.33Ghz@Swiftech Apogee GT
- Palit GTX460 768mb@Swiftech MCW60@1000mhz-1.212v
- Kingston 3gb 800mhz
- Alphacool NexXxoS Xtreme III Rev.2 360mm
- CM Stacker 830
- Samsung 2233BW 22'' TFT
- Creative X-Fi Xtrememusic
- Gigaworks Progamer G500
GTX280 will cost at least 3x as much as a 3870, so id be really ****ed if it wasnt 3x faster.....
nVidia presented us with the info that their new gear did exactly what it should. That shouldnt be news!
Sadly its never been linear, but I dont believe in paying 4x as much as 10% more performance.
If everyone thought like that, the price structure of hardware would be different.
Value for money >>> all else.
Oh- and nV say their new card is 3x faster. Il believe it when joe average pulls the same numbers.
i could care less, if i buy this card its for games and folding as a side project, i doubt someone would buy a $400+ video card to only fold with it
gtx 280 is freakin insanely fast.
Last edited by grimREEFER; 05-23-2008 at 05:12 PM.
DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis
In the UK, the 3870 was the top card for a while.
Do you mean performance or price? The 3870 is no slouch in performance/£, although- yea, it depends on the game
Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
Since GTX 280 supports tri sli...
1 Card = 3x faster than 3870
2 Cards = 6x faster than hd3870
3 Cards = 9x faster than hd3870
In trisli 280 will freaking much faster than an cpu.
If 1 card gets 500points and cpu it's 125x faster.
In trisli or 3 cards it's freaking 375x faster!
There numbers are ridiclous and maybe FUD.
But yeah, DAMN!
You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet![]()
Ze gear:[22:53:09] [@Jaco-XS] i'm gonna overclock this damn box!
Main rig: W3520 + 12GB ddr3 + Gigabyte X58A-UD3R rev2.0! + HD7970 + HD6350 DMS59 + HX520 + 2x X25-E 32gig R0 + Bunch of HDDs.
ESXI: Dell C6100 XS23-TY3 Node - 1x L5630 + 24GB ECC REG + Brocade 1020 10GbE
ZFS Server: Supermicro 826E1 + Supermicro X8DAH+-F + 1x L5630 + 24GB ECC REG + 10x 3TB HDDs + Brocade 1020 10GbE
Lappy!: Lenovo Thinkpad W500: T9600 + 8GB + FireGL v5700 + 128GB Samsung 830 + 320GB 2.5" in ze dvd slot + 1920x1200 @ 15.4"![]()
isnt folding memory/cpu based and nonlinear
but we dont know what they did to get the number if if there are no stats it dosnt count, alll i see is NV with an ati card and their new one, im sure that it will score higher but CUDA is complex and it would take alot of work to make it efficient
also how can they rate it, the NV one should be like the ati when it 1st came out were it was doing simple ones and getting rechecked
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
F@H scaling depends on the WU- I pitted an E2140 @ 3.2GHz with single-channel RAM against an E66@ 3.2 with dual-channel RAM and the frame time for what I was working on at the time was the same.
I am always sceptical about the results a company is showing when it comes to promoting there own product. Its never an equal setup, 9/10 times there testing setup is in favour of the of there own product. I will wait for the websites reviews and benches.
Bookmarks