Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 75

Thread: 9800GTX pic and specs

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,186

    9800GTX pic and specs

    VR-Zone has gotten some details and photos of the GeForce 9800 GTX (G92-P392) card. It comes with 12-layer PCB at 4.376" by 10.5". This card is clocked at 673MHz for core and 1683MHz for the shader while memory clock is yet to be determined. The memory interface is 256-bit with 512MB of 136-pin BGA GDDR3 memory onboard. It comes with two DVI-I and one HDTV-out. There are two SLI connectors and two 6-pin PCIe power connector. The card employs the CoolerMaster TM67 cooler where the fan is rated at 0.34A, 4.08W, 2900rpm, 34dBA. The total board power is 168W.


    source, http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/GeFo...iled/5599.html
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9800GTX-1.jpg 
Views:	2949 
Size:	26.2 KB 
ID:	72949   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9800GTX-2.jpg 
Views:	3008 
Size:	16.8 KB 
ID:	72950  
    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Grinchville Embassy; Santa Cruz, Aruba
    Posts
    599
    FInaly

  3. #3
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,472
    Im sort of disappointed.

    Is this just an overclocked 8800GTS?
    CPU: Intel CORE 2 Duo E6550 @ 3.6GHz w/ 1.29vcore (517*7)
    Motherboard:
    Gigabyte P35-DQ6
    Memory:
    Crucial 8500's
    Video:
    Nvidia 8800GTX
    PSU:
    Zippy 700W (fan modded of course)

  4. #4
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    The memory interface is 256-bit with 512MB of 136-pin BGA GDDR3 memory onboard.
    Sooooo.....it's an 8800GTS 512MB with a slight overclock and boasts Tri-SLI compatibility.

  5. #5
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,472
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Sooooo.....it's an 8800GTS 512MB with a slight overclock.

    why not call it a 8900GTX heh


    ATi is going to have a nice year.
    CPU: Intel CORE 2 Duo E6550 @ 3.6GHz w/ 1.29vcore (517*7)
    Motherboard:
    Gigabyte P35-DQ6
    Memory:
    Crucial 8500's
    Video:
    Nvidia 8800GTX
    PSU:
    Zippy 700W (fan modded of course)

  6. #6
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    ble, so its official 9800gtx is worse then a factory oced 8800ultra...

  7. #7
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    I would also like to point something else out:

    There are two SLI connectors
    The card in the picture above does NOT have two SLI connectors.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    it also doesn't have 2 dvi + 1 Hdmi

    hrm

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    351
    so, chip is the same, this is 673 mhz and g92 gts is 650 mhz, memory should be in the 2100-2200 range I guess...
    so the only point in this card is replacing the 8800GTX/Ultra all in once with a more price effective card (with less ram also)
    it does make sense since a faster card would have been too close to the GX2
    Last edited by Tuvok-LuR-; 02-25-2008 at 11:06 AM.
    3570K @ 4.5Ghz | Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H | 7970 Ghz 1100/6000 | 256GB Samsung 830 SSD (Win 7) | 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD (OSX 10.8.3) | 16GB Vengeance 1600 | 24'' Dell U2412M | Corsair Carbide 300R

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sillicon Valley, California
    Posts
    1,261
    After 5 years, Nvidia is finally now capable of releasing the same model number as ATI.
    Athlon 64 3200+ | ASUS M2A-VM 0202 | Corsair XMS2 TWIN2X2048-6400 | 3ware 9650SE 4LPML | Seasonic SS-380HB | Antec Solo
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz | ASUS P5WDG2-WS Pro 1001 | Gigabyte 4850HD Silent | G.Skill F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ | Samsung MCCOE64G5MPP-0VA SLC SSD | Seasonic M12 650 | Antec P180
    Core i7-2600K @ 4.3 GHz @ 1.30V | ASUS P8P67 Pro | Sparkle GTX 560 Ti | G.Skill Ripjaw X F3-12800CL8 4x4GB @ 933MHz 9-10-9-24 2T | Crucial C300 128GB | Seasonic X750 Gold | Antec P183


    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    DRAM production lines are simple and extremely cheap in a ultra low profit market.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    *yawn*... People, this is a tide over from nvidia to get off of more expensive 90nm, and to just step things up a bit more while waiting to see ATi's next move. NVidia's been in a very comfortable position, as such they can hold back the big gun until they absolutely have to launch it(think R700).

    Calling it the 9 series is a marketing decision so customers don't think "Well, ATi have gone up to the 38** series, so that must be better than the older 8*** series".

    Also, that picture isn't a 9800GTX...
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,186
    HEY, dont kill the messenger. but diltech is right for the most ppart, its just a more energy efficient card thats cheaper to make. and about the pic, i say its real because its vr-zone.
    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

  13. #13
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    Also, that picture isn't a 9800GTX...
    Well, I didn't want to come out and say it but........QFT.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    So an 8800GTS 512 with Tri-SLI = 9800GTX...

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    *yawn*... People, this is a tide over from nvidia to get off of more expensive 90nm, and to just step things up a bit more while waiting to see ATi's next move. NVidia's been in a very comfortable position, as such they can hold back the big gun until they absolutely have to launch it(think R700).

    Calling it the 9 series is a marketing decision so customers don't think "Well, ATi have gone up to the 38** series, so that must be better than the older 8*** series".

    Also, that picture isn't a 9800GTX...
    It isn't the 9800GX2. Well it doesn't look like a GX2.

    GX2







    GTX(?)



    Last edited by Tim; 02-25-2008 at 11:26 AM.

    Intel Core i7-3770K
    ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
    EVGA GTX 970 SC
    Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
    Corsair H80
    120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
    Corsair RM650
    Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
    OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North West London
    Posts
    776
    Wow! i'm impressed, must get one

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    71
    If this is true i'm really disappointed.
    I just got a 3870 X2 for testing and reselling in 2 months or so, i already found someone who wants it. I wanted to have a real monster card to finally play Crysis at very high in multiplayer without any framerate drops down to 20/30.
    But it seems like the new nvidia cards wont be able to do this.
    Very pitty..
    Desktop and Gaming PC

    CPU: AMD Phenom II 940 - TESTING
    Motherboard: ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe - BIOS0703
    RAM: Transcend aXeRam 2x2GB 5-5-5-15
    GPU: HD4870 512MB
    Case: Coolermaster HAF
    PSU: Enermax Revolution85+ 1050W
    Storage: 2x250GB Seagate SATA2 Raid0 + Samsung Spinpoint 1TB
    Cooling: Custom Water with Triple Radi for CPU+Mainboard

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    *yawn*... People, this is a tide over from nvidia to get off of more expensive 90nm, and to just step things up a bit more while waiting to see ATi's next move. NVidia's been in a very comfortable position, as such they can hold back the big gun until they absolutely have to launch it(think R700).

    Calling it the 9 series is a marketing decision so customers don't think "Well, ATi have gone up to the 38** series, so that must be better than the older 8*** series".

    Also, that picture isn't a 9800GTX...
    Why would they release 9800GTX2 with such a crappy dual PCB design and the bad reputation that had their previous attempt if they were in such a comfortable position

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    337
    So if the normal leading product is called flagship, do we just call this flagsh1t?
    Good god. Where's fast forward button already. I sorely hope that AMD's next graphics flagship product puts a gargantuan fire under Nvidia's ass. Until the truly new tech gets here, my money and I will be sleeping under a rock.
    System: Core I7 920 @ 4200MHz 1.45vCORE 1.35VTT 1.2vIOH // EVGA x58 Classified E760 // 6GB Dominator GT 1866 @ 1688 6-7-6-18 1T 1.65V // Intel X25 80GB // PCP&C 750W Silencer
    Cooling: Heatkiller 3.0 LT CPU block // 655 Pump // GTX360 Radiator
    Sound: X-FI Titanium HD --> Marantz 2265 --> JBL 4311WXA's
    Display: GTX480 // Sony GDM-FW900

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun View Post
    Why would they release 9800GTX2 with such a crappy dual PCB design and the bad reputation that had their previous attempt if they were in such a comfortable position
    We can't call it crap until we see how it performs...

    Anyway, they're merely doing it to combat ATi's efforts. If they weren't comfortable, they'd just push forward and drop a real new lineup instead of playing sit and wait, all the while giving them time to set up to drop on a smaller process size.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    CA Bay Area
    Posts
    915
    I guess I wont be upgrading for a while now...

  22. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    47
    This really looks disappointing. Hopefully the card gives the performance the Nvidia guys say it has!

  23. #23
    Back from the Dead
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    6,602
    Well... nothing known about shader units and stuff so far, but with only 512MB Vram, this card WILL suck in high res gaming. Maybe if they put out a 1GB version like they already did with the 8800GT...
    World Community Grid - come join a great team and help us fight for a better tomorrow![size=1]


  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    *yawn*... People, this is a tide over from nvidia to get off of more expensive 90nm, and to just step things up a bit more while waiting to see ATi's next move. NVidia's been in a very comfortable position, as such they can hold back the big gun until they absolutely have to launch it(think R700).

    Calling it the 9 series is a marketing decision so customers don't think "Well, ATi have gone up to the 38** series, so that must be better than the older 8*** series".

    Also, that picture isn't a 9800GTX...
    True, but you have to understand that people were expecting more.....
    Lets now wait for RV770

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    584
    That's probably 9800GT,it will be interesting to see if it has the same SP's 9600 has since they are better than the old ones anyway it sucks that Nvidia hasn't solved the HDMI sound problem yet.
    As for the 512mb GDDR,they are enough for now...
    Last edited by XS2K; 02-25-2008 at 12:32 PM.
    Before you complain about lag, think about Jesus. He lagged three days before respawning.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •