Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: GB-X38-DQ6 3Dmark testing 8800GTX + 2900pro CF

  1. 10-13-2007, 04:02 AM #1
    DStealth
    DStealth is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    364
    Send a message via ICQ to DStealth

    GB-X38-DQ6 3Dmark testing 8800GTX + 2900pro CF

    System:
    CPU: Q6600@4152/4160mhz @1.64V Water cooled MP05LE SP
    MB: GB-X38-DQ6 @ 462x9 125 pci-e set in bios MCH +0.3v
    Ram: SuperT 2x1gb new crap Promos 1110 5-4-4-10-4-35 2T @ 2.2v
    Video: Galaxy 8800GTX@720/2390mhz Water cooled EK8800 block @ 1.45/2.1v
    PSU : Chieftec Turbo 1200W

    3Dmark2001
    77047


    3Dmark2003
    52104
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5560099

    3Dmark2005
    24008
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3554904

    3Dmark2006
    16700
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3367952

    Not the best,I can do, but for water with auto radiator and 20+*C ambient temps, good results.

    I have 5 x Ati 2900Pro next to me , and the fun will just begin


    Edit: CF results

    System:
    CPU: Q6600@4152/4160mhz @1.64V Water cooled MP05LE SP
    MB: GB-X38-DQ6 @ 462x9 125 pci-e set in bios MCH +0.3v
    Ram: SuperT 2x1gb new crap Promos 1110 5-4-4-10-4-35 2T @ 2.2v
    Video: Sapphire 2900pro@873/2322mhz Stock cooled , no Volts
    PSU : Chieftec Turbo 1200W

    3Dmark2006
    873/2322mhz Q6600@4160mhz
    21907

    Woohooooo

    3dmark2005
    873/2322mhz Q6600@4160mhz
    28k points


    3dmark2003
    873/2322mhz Q6600@4160mhz
    75006 points


    3dmark2001
    873/2322mhz Q6600@4160mhz
    75406 points


    Weak in 2001 definitely
    Edit: Max 2006
    21926

    Seems 22k are out of reach with water cooled system and non working Vreg in crossfire with stock coolers
    Last edited by DStealth; 10-15-2007 at 09:28 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-13-2007, 04:23 AM #2
    Zannema
    Zannema is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    477
    Send a message via MSN to Zannema
    Nice result , X38 is real good chipset for 3dmark
    Extreme Overclocker

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-13-2007, 04:28 AM #3
    nachthymnen
    nachthymnen is offline
    Master of nebulah frost
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Dolomites(Italy)
    Posts
    2,238
    Great start and very impressive Nature score for "only" 720/1188 GTX.
    Battlefield 3: Nachthymnen666
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-13-2007, 11:34 PM #4
    DStealth
    DStealth is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    364
    Send a message via ICQ to DStealth
    These 2900pro are beasts :
    3Dmark2006
    21661 points 850/2200т Q6600@4140mhz


    The bad thing is that with higher frequency i'm getting lower scores

    860/2300 mhz Q6600@ 4160mhz
    Last edited by DStealth; 10-14-2007 at 12:33 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-14-2007, 12:39 AM #5
    DStealth
    DStealth is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    364
    Send a message via ICQ to DStealth
    Quote Originally Posted by DStealth View Post
    These 2900pro are beasts :
    3Dmark2006
    21661 points 850/2200т Q6600@4140mhz


    The bad thing is that with higher frequency i'm getting lower scores

    860/2300 mhz Q6600@ 4160mhz
    Ohh i got it , it was from Catalist AI setting from standard/advanced

    3Dmark2006
    873/2322mhz Q6600@4160mhz
    21907

    Woohooooo

    3dmark2005
    873/2322mhz Q6600@4160mhz
    28k points


    3dmark2003
    873/2322mhz Q6600@4160mhz
    75006 points


    3dmark2001
    873/2322mhz Q6600@4160mhz
    75406 points


    Weak in 2001 definitely
    Last edited by DStealth; 10-14-2007 at 01:56 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-14-2007, 06:03 AM #6
    Severance
    Severance is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    251
    DSdeath how did you overclock crossfire? did you use the switching display method? Nice scores
    Last edited by Severance; 10-14-2007 at 06:05 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-14-2007, 06:15 AM #7
    DStealth
    DStealth is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    364
    Send a message via ICQ to DStealth
    Quote Originally Posted by Severance View Post
    DSdeath how did you overclock crossfire? did you use the switching display method? Nice scores
    Yes
    74 point to hit 22k , but removed the cards. Good results for stock coolers i think too , if only Vreg can work for both cards , i would go much higher
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-14-2007, 06:23 AM #8
    coolice
    coolice is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    73
    Send a message via MSN to coolice
    nice score
    did u flash the bios to xt?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-14-2007, 10:16 AM #9
    Severance
    Severance is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by DStealth View Post
    Yes
    74 point to hit 22k , but removed the cards. Good results for stock coolers i think too , if only Vreg can work for both cards , i would go much higher
    Im trying the method in vista but when i switch display and open amdgpu tool it reads wrong clocks for both cards? first reads what it supposed to like 24334.7 but the second only reads 2d clocks correct and 3d clocks are same as 2d clocks. When i try and overclock the first card the computer starts to lock up
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-14-2007, 11:42 AM #10
    SIOUX
    SIOUX is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Hammel/Denmark
    Posts
    2,060
    Send a message via ICQ to SIOUX
    Those 813 FPS 3d01 nature is with 2 2900PRO cards right??
    The whole world's hip and thats not cool !

    Rip Van Hippy

    Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected ?

    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak


    -------------------------
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-14-2007, 11:53 AM #11
    DStealth
    DStealth is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    364
    Send a message via ICQ to DStealth
    Quote Originally Posted by SIOUX View Post
    Those 813 FPS 3d01 nature is with 2 2900PRO cards right??
    Yes looks to me very low , but that's the score. I ran all 3dmarks in one session . So sure CF was enabled, but with single 8800 score in 2001 is much higher and the funny thing is 2003 is ~ same as 2001
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-15-2007, 02:02 AM #12
    SIOUX
    SIOUX is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Hammel/Denmark
    Posts
    2,060
    Send a message via ICQ to SIOUX
    AFAIK CF dont realy work with 3d01. but there is no way its posible to get 813fps with only one ATI/AMD card on air/water. thats why its interesting
    The whole world's hip and thats not cool !

    Rip Van Hippy

    Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected ?

    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak


    -------------------------
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-15-2007, 10:37 AM #13
    momomo6789
    momomo6789 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    324
    can someone link the how to for oc in cf 2900xts ? i did search and didn't find it
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-15-2007, 01:06 PM #14
    LowRun
    LowRun is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by momomo6789 View Post
    can someone link the how to for oc in cf 2900xts ? i did search and didn't find it
    there it is: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...2900+crossfire
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-26-2007, 01:26 PM #15
    DStealth
    DStealth is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    364
    Send a message via ICQ to DStealth
    MADNEEEEEES

    New 169 drivers :
    Single 8800GTX@water + CPU on water
    17446


    In the beginning of the year we were fighting to get such a score with 2x8800GTX in SLI + E6660 .
    Last edited by DStealth; 10-26-2007 at 01:28 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-26-2007, 03:57 PM #16
    Severance
    Severance is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by DStealth View Post
    MADNEEEEEES

    New 169 drivers :
    Single 8800GTX@water + CPU on water
    17446


    In the beginning of the year we were fighting to get such a score with 2x8800GTX in SLI + E6660 .
    169 driver? link please
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 10-26-2007, 04:17 PM #17
    DMH
    DMH is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    668
    Search Nvidia.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 10-26-2007, 04:43 PM #18
    Severance
    Severance is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    251
    No where near 17k for me using evga 680i mobo and 8800gtx with 169 drivers. Single card gets 14k and sli get 17k
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 10-26-2007, 04:50 PM #19
    PPInDaHouse
    PPInDaHouse is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    521
    Send a message via MSN to PPInDaHouse
    Quote Originally Posted by DStealth View Post
    MADNEEEEEES

    New 169 drivers :
    Single 8800GTX@water + CPU on water
    17446


    In the beginning of the year we were fighting to get such a score with 2x8800GTX in SLI + E6660 .

    good score for single 8800gtx and watercooled system. those new drivers seems to be nice
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 10-26-2007, 06:15 PM #20
    railmeat
    railmeat is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    plan3t 3@rth
    Posts
    987
    'In the beginning of the year we were fighting to get such a score with 2x8800GTX in SLI + E6660 '


    well give another 2,000 points to overall score for quad vs dual...
    Stacker830 Watercooled
    windows7 ultimate 64 bit!!!
    heatkiller(rev3) on 2500k@ 4.5ghz 1.35v,8 gigs 2133 ripjaws 1.5v
    Swiftech Mcp-655,1/2in tygon,13x120 sunnons on junk ps,
    (2)triple 120mm rads,Biostar TP67XE(rev 5.2)
    150 gig velicraptor (stable drive) ssds r still buggy!!
    xfi-xtrememusic,klipsch ultras, sen hd-595s
    Evga Hydro gtX 590,co0lermaster-1250 watt,
    24" Sony fw-900 black ops at @ 2304x1440 85hz/85fps SOLID
    G@m3r 4 L1Fe!!
    http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j1...0VIEW%20ALL--/
    3dmark 11 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1102387
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 10-27-2007, 04:29 AM #21
    DStealth
    DStealth is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    364
    Send a message via ICQ to DStealth
    Quote Originally Posted by nachthymnen View Post
    Great start and very impressive Nature score for "only" 720/1188 GTX.
    Same frequency , new driver - 10fps more impressive

    77679

    855fps Nature

    Edit:
    78338

    861.5fps Nature

    I also has 863.2fps Nature, but lost the result
    Last edited by DStealth; 10-27-2007 at 02:53 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules