Link
If that is the case then INTEL will kill AMD by 2008. AMD sucks
Link
If that is the case then INTEL will kill AMD by 2008. AMD sucks
Dell Ultra Sharp 24" LCD
Core i7 920 @ 4GHZ
Gigabyte EX58-UD5
2 GIG Wintec AMPX DDR3 @ 1600mhz
ATI 4850 512MB
Sweiftech Dual MCR320 Radiators
Dtek Fuzion + MCW60 + MCW30 blocks.
ATI 650 Pro HDTV Wonder
(2 X 150GB RAPTORS) RAID 0
Thermaltake Armor LCS
saw that
*pukes
if that is the case it will be one of the biggest reason why i won't jump all over the CPUs like a rash
yack
no mention of memory config/timings used etc ???
---
AMD has never been a SUPERPI monster.
It wil be a 3d monster again as we were used to..
besides that it's 3secs faster at 200mhz less compared to K8
horseshyte man
K8 was absolutely demolishing Intels(netburst) until Ln2 was taken into consideration or until people starting seriously benching centrino (but not many guys did that really cept for a few loyal intel guys and a couple of hard core guys)
I wouldn't rate how good a CPU is on how it does on superpi. Oooo goody, intel's CPUs can calculate pi faster, whoop-de-do, who gives a crap. I'm interested in the overall total performance. And I'm waiting until release to believe too much about it, a few benchmarks here and there with a lack of total system specs isn't very helpful to me.
Now I guess if calculating pi to the nth digit is your thing then whatever, do what you want.
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
B/c Netburst did well at SuperPI is the reason i discount SuperPI entirely.
It's nice as an initial check on system stability, but that's about it.
>> i5 750 @ 3.6Ghz | CM212Plus + P12 | P55-UD3R [BIOS F2] | 4GB G.Skill CL8 | Zotac GTX 580
.: 4 x 1TB WD | Corsair TX750 | Lian Li PC-A70A | X-Fi | Logitech Z-2300
While I agree superpi doesn't mean jacksh*t, I must say it's not the only things apparently Barcelona suck in - look at Cinebench, look at almost any leaked numbers: they all worse clock-for-clock than current Intel numbers, let alone Penryn or after that.
It sure looks dark for AMD.
what does a xeon@2Ghz with 1066/1333bus have for results?
i5 3570k | Asus Z77-V Dlx | 16Gb 2400 HyperX Pred | ASUS 6950 2Gb DCuII | X-fi Titanium | Samsung SA350
Corsair AX860i | Hyperx 3k 120Gb,i520 120Gb,320 7200.11,2x2Tb WdB | Corsair H80i | Antec P280 | win7 x64
EVEN the 30k '06 being true, Barcelona/Agena X4 @ 2GHz performing equal to Barton @ 2.5GHz on 1M PI just can't be good...
BUT we have to remeber that we can't confirm if that is true...
PS.: Is it just me, or the score really came from coolaler's site?
PC 1 • PC 2
[Intel Q9450 @ 3.733GHz] • [Intel E8400 @ 4GHz]
[XFX nForce 780i 3 Way SLI] • [ASUS P5K Premium Wifi Black Pearl]
[2x2GB G.Skill F2-8000CL5-2GBPQ] • [2x2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer]
[Visiontek HD4870 512MB] • [MSI 8800GT 512MB]
[LG 2243W 21.5" FullHD LCD] • [Samsung T220 22" LCD]
[Solytech 600W] • [SevenTeam V-Force 750W]
But that's why I'm waiting for release. All I'm seeing are some numbers here and there from different places, some of them aren't adding up, and we all know that some of the initial batches of K10 weren't good, so how many of these numbers are from the not-so-great chips? Makes me wonder. Once the thing is released then we'll know for certain, until then it is just a lot of speculation and I'm sick of it. Sept 10th get here already darnit!
*EDIT* check this here: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=138
So it looks maybe these scores are done on the "broken" chips. There is hope yet. Sept 10th we'll know (or soon after).
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
What part of the CPU does SuperPi use? It was my impression that Barcelona/Phenom will be have improved FPU capabilities compared to K8 along with a general improvement in per clock ability.
I MSI P67A-GD65 I Intel i5 2500K I 8Gb Samsung I
I Corsair F3 60Gb I AMD 6850 I Dell SP2208WFP I Windows 7 x64 I
I Current Speed: 4.5Ghz I RAM 1866Mhz @ 9-9-9-27 1T I
I Laptop I Acer 1830T I Intel i5-470UM I Crucial M225 I 4Gb DDR3 I
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
This SPi1m result is bogus.K10 @2Ghz performs better than that..EVT B0s or B1s that are bugged.
stupid bug... i am stealing it. i think the call should wait on wiehter or not amd will regain its crown
CPU Q6600 @ 3.15Ghz D-tek CPU Block
GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3R 350Mhz FSB
RAM G.SKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK DDR2 1066
GPU Nvidia 8800GT MCW-60 700Mhz Core 1.0 GHz Mem
PSU Cooler Master realPower 550W
Storage 3 500 GB WD Caviar SE16 in RAID 0 + 300gb WD
Misc. CM stacker STC-T01 w/ Cross-flow fan, 2 MCR-320 Rads, DCC 355 W/ Petras Top, 12 YateLoon D12SL-12, ~12ft Tygon 9/16 ID tubing
Crunching for [XS]
Somebody please post a 2.0 GHz K8 number, preferably AM2. It's so long ago I ran anything at 2.0 GHz I don't have anything anymore
BTW, it is likely/possible that this SuperPi score is screwed by the OS allocating memory in the NUMA memory bank in the other processor and/or switching processors during this run.
Bookmarks