MMM
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Intel Pentium E2140 Dual Core Processor Review

  1. #1
    Xtreme News
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,594

    Intel Pentium E2140 Dual Core Processor Review

    Intel has spent millions making their "Core" brand synonymous with high performance processing. In these days of the Core Duo, Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad, and Core 2 Extreme, it’s pretty easy to find a Core microarchitecture-based processor to match nearly any possible price point. The performance levels of the Core 2 product lineup have been so dominating that Intel really didn’t have to spend a penny if they didn’t want to, although big time marketing campaigns are good for converting those who just want the latest and greatest and don’t necessarily read enthusiast sites like ours here.

    Despite the Core 2 being a successful lineup from top to bottom, Intel’s Pentium product name is still a valuable asset. Intel’s last Pentium-branded product launches happened mid last year, with the “Presler” core based Pentium-D processors hitting the market at speeds in excess of 3.0 GHz. Soon afterwards, the first generation Core 2 processors hit the streets and (more or less) dominated the Pentium-D in terms of performance, all the while consuming far less power and creating much less heat. From that point forward, many had figured the Pentium name would be essentially dead, simply living out its final days as inventory in warehouses until the Core 2 made it obsolete.

    Apparently, this is not what Intel had in mind. A while back, we started to hear rumblings of a “new” Pentium processor. While the Pentium had always targeted the performance crowd, it appeared that Intel would be taking the name in a new direction, pushing it to the value sector where their Celeron brand typically resided. As the Celeron name does not have a strong following, replacing it with an aging (but still well known) brand like Pentium does make quite a lot of sense. The question is, what really is this “new” Pentium processor? Is this a new architecture, or simply a new chip based on something we’ve already seen?

    The answers to those questions are finally here, as the first “new” Pentium processor has arrived and is running in our lab. This new processor is shipping at two speeds, 1.6 GHz (E2140) and 1.8 GHz (E2160), is based on a dual-core architecture, and ships in the same powder-blue box we’ve come to associate with the Core 2 Duo.
    For a $95 (USD) processor, the Intel Pentium E2140 put up a surprisingly solid performance, which is a testament to this chip's overall value. Albeit under a new name, Intel is finally moving their Conroe dual-core architecture down to the budget markets, bringing true modern dual-core performance to low-end systems, which is something everyone can appreciate.

    In terms of raw performance, the Pentium E2140 only runs about 10% slower in most cases than Intel’s cheapest Core 2 Duo processor, the E6300, which is impressive considering it has a lower clock speed and half the cache. However, the Pentium E2140 ($95) is currently 42% cheaper than the Core 2 Duo E6300 ($165), making it a better value compared to low-end Core 2 Duo processors. We should also note that, AMD does have dual-core Athlon 64 X2 processors which are as inexpensive as $55 in some cases, so if you’re looking for extreme low-budget dual-core processing, AMD still delivers the lowest price. For Intel-based dual-core computing though, the Pentium E2100-series chips are excellent choices for those with limited budgets.

    When looking at the benchmarks, we also see that the Pentium E2140 can provide extremely good performance when overclocked. Notably, the chip performs great in workstation and basic office-class applications, where the smaller amount of L2 cache does not hurt performance as much as one would expect. Gamers, however, would be better served by a chip with a larger amount of L2 cache, as the smaller L2 compliment on the Pentium E2100 series does hurt its clock-for-clock gaming performance against the Core 2 Duo. While others have pushed these chips further with more exotic cooling, we pushed our chip to 2.9 GHz with the stock cooler. At this level, the Pentium E2140 processor can provide performance similar to a Core 2 Duo E6700 ($320) in best case scenarios. The Pentium E2140 can push very high clock speeds with very little work, and the stock cooler which Intel bundles is whisper silent most of the time, which makes for a great combination.
    http://www.hothardware.com/articles/...cessor/?page=1

  2. #2
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    It's going to rock...problem is AMD"s X2 3600 and 3800 are a tough combo to beat, stock to stock that is :p

    Perkam

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    525
    what is the projected price on these after the q3 price cuts? it would have to be in the sub $70 range i would imagine.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    386
    These are like £60 in the UK.
    Last edited by Baron; 05-29-2007 at 01:46 PM.

  5. #5
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    Hello my little friend, now I just need a quad-core verison of you! Interesting chip for ultra-budget PCs. Pretty soon even my calculator is going to be dual-core..

  6. #6
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Philly/NJ
    Posts
    3,933
    i wonder how this would do on a small gaming pc

  7. #7
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32 View Post
    i wonder how this would do on a small gaming pc
    small? when overclocked to about 3ghz this thing will handle any game you ask and beg for more. it's a great value for the price!!!!! you could make an entire high or mid range gaming machine around one of these things overclocked.
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    386
    http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...7728458&page=1




    Not sure on gaming performace. No one has done anything.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Not too bad at games, though when overclocked to 3GHz, the differences in cache size are visible:

    http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-21...benchmark.html
    http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/cpu/r.../993288_9.html

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    706
    how do these compare to the e4300/4400 a price/preformance comparison there would be nice.
    Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?

    Think of something witty and imagine it here.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    3,882
    These scream eMachine.

  12. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    8,556
    FCG, yep they sure do. They also will find themselves in HPs, Dell and every other cheap no name brand.

    But hey, its good performance for everybody.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •