I`m confused
The story with my E6400 started when I bought it from kiwi. Then I put it under DI and got a WR on that But the results were doudtful because the CPU was faster than most of conroes @ that freq
Now, though, with new CPU-Z 1.37 it all got clear. Downloaded it today in the morning - tested it on my mom`s PC (since my E6700 rig is undercostruction) - didn`t believe my eyes - CPU has shown 4Mb of cache !!! Tried CrustalCPUID - the same thing - 4096Kbytes
Screenshot
Some CPU-Z validation
Thought it was a bug -> tested it in SuperPi (under TT BigTyphoon + chilled air , Vcore = 1.625V ) where the difference between Conroe and Allendale can plainly be seen ... and ... got this result This is more Conroe-ish (OS - stock & dirty WinXP) (sry, never tested it before - it was just running under BOXed cooler )
So, there you have it... if you want for me to run ANY benchmark (to establish that it`s not a bug) - just ask
If you are in Latvia - you`re welcome @ my house
BTW - is there any other software that can detect CPU cache ???
P.S.
Am I forgetting something ?
Yes
Pic of the chip
The BOX
Does anyone over here have L625A348 E6400 or similar ??
kiwi, we have some talking to do
Bookmarks