Early testing with X1950XTX with everything on air. Tower 120 on the 6700.
The current oc-tools is limiting the memclock, 1143MHz is max.
Early testing with X1950XTX with everything on air. Tower 120 on the 6700.
The current oc-tools is limiting the memclock, 1143MHz is max.
Last edited by Kinc; 08-23-2006 at 10:06 AM.
Wow, spanks my card pretty bad, I don't think those clocks would work for stable gaming though. If they are I would be tempted to sell my card for 200 and pick up a 1950 for 200 moreI would have the card on water so maybe...
I7 920@4ghz
EVGA Classified X58
6GB Corsiar 1600
2X GTX 285@756/1550/2700
Corsiar 1000WT
ASUS 25.5 LCD/58"Plasma TH-58PZ800U
Custom H2O cooling
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Oh, thats a pic of my other rig.
niceee
how's oc score hehe ( edit... nvm it is oc already )
Will be interesting to see what the GDDR4 chips can do with added voltage and cooling.
I7 920@4ghz
EVGA Classified X58
6GB Corsiar 1600
2X GTX 285@756/1550/2700
Corsiar 1000WT
ASUS 25.5 LCD/58"Plasma TH-58PZ800U
Custom H2O cooling
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Oh, thats a pic of my other rig.
1143MHz is on default voltageOriginally Posted by rodman
![]()
nice score![]()
now go for something colder and we all like new tool for higher mem oc![]()
CPU: Intel Core i5 660 @ 4GHz / 1.28v
CPU COOLER: Cooler Master Vortex Plus
MBD: MSI P55-GD65
RAM: 1GB Adata
GFX: ATi Radeon X700Pro 256MB
HDD: Samsung Spinpoint F2 1.5TB
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 750W
Oh I almost forgot, one other thing you will like:
No Coldbug
Don't mind the clocks, waiting for the new ATItool before maxing it out.
why i feel not gain too much with x1900xtx , how about 3D06?Originally Posted by Kinc
thats really niceOriginally Posted by Kinc
![]()
CPU: Intel Core i5 660 @ 4GHz / 1.28v
CPU COOLER: Cooler Master Vortex Plus
MBD: MSI P55-GD65
RAM: 1GB Adata
GFX: ATi Radeon X700Pro 256MB
HDD: Samsung Spinpoint F2 1.5TB
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 750W
Great news,thanksOriginally Posted by Kinc
![]()
Because the oc-tool algorithm for the mem losens the timings badlyOriginally Posted by hicookie
There are people working to solve the problem. Still there is a nice gain VS a aircooled X1900XTX.
Please do a 3D06 for us![]()
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
well..... as i know.... G80 is much stronger than x1950 for now....
also... if 7950GX2 counts as one card.... it is better than x1950 too...
hey... but DI / LN2 on X1950 and not for 7950 lol
btw. i feel 3.9G C2D should hold up to 15000 3Dmak06 and about 30000 3Dmark05.... damn we need X1950 CF or Q-SLi heheheh
Originally Posted by guess2098
^^Sorry but you are incorrect the 7950 does have 2 cards and uses 2 cores. I am not sure where you are basing your information from but its simply not correct. ATI has not followed suit on a dual core solution yet (bringing it to market). It's not simply better then 1950 its only a dual GPU that's better. If you want to make a comparison you have to look at the efficiency between the 2. To be honest if the 1950xtx does keep pace with a dual GPU 7950 its obvious that the x1950xtx is more efficient.
Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 08-23-2006 at 10:28 AM.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I will, be back later with the results. I will also try the 6.8 in 05 instead of the early driver I used. 6.8 has some perf increase in it. Wanna brake 16k all on airOriginally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
![]()
heheh yeah 2 core but use pci-e slot so i count it as one card. to me i don't care it is 2 core 4 core, as long as it gives better score.. that is what important to me. x1950 is targeting at the high end place right? if can't beats 7950 then that is bad..... as i know R600 is delay also.Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
but good thing is x1950 can do DI / LN2 and ram can do much higher with voltage pump in heheee(kinc show us 2.3v come on i can't wait to see 1300 / 2600 hehe)
That is not impossible but there is no oc tool that can set over 1143MHz atm. Over 1143 the performence drops to about 10fps.Originally Posted by guess2098
Looks like a fun card to bench with a nice jump over X1900, in CF these cards are gonna score big. The missing coldbug is worth every penny.
oh woow really? basiclly not enough voltage...... hummmOriginally Posted by Kinc
then..... vmod vmod heheeee
i will ask xV for how they did it
Your not getting me. The voltage is at 1.9V for 1143MHz. I could set 2.48V but the problem is in the algorithm for the clock, the clockgen gets "corrupted" over 1143MHz.Originally Posted by guess2098
oh i see... finally i got you nowOriginally Posted by Kinc
might be someone lies to me lol
but i will check what tool they used
-73C nice!
looking very good there![]()
---
Kinc, could u test 01 nature? im interesting in new GDD4Originally Posted by Kinc
![]()
i think not far, new oc tool release out, hope it will solve the issues
Tested with another cascade. -92 in atitool is all goodOriginally Posted by eva2000
![]()
Bookmarks