Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 49

Thread: ATI Takes on Physics - Computex Day 1

  1. #1
    Xtreme News
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,594

    ATI Takes on Physics - Computex Day 1

    http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==

    Below are pictures of an Intel Badaxe motherboard running a Conroe processor that has a 3 16x PCIe slot configuration. There are three X1900 XT video cards installed. Two are doing CrossFire graphics and the third X1900 XT is being used at the physics processor.

  2. #2
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    I do not believe that's what we had in mind when we thought physics for the third card.

    Perkam

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    118
    The 3rd X1900 is just for show. We will be able to run physics with a X1300 or X1600 just fine.

    I'm sure that that rig is quite a screamer.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    311
    lol
    imagine a heavily overvolted and overclocked smithfield and 3 X1900XT working @ 1.575v 7XX/8XX
    1kw psu wont be enough?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,556
    ATI claims that their CrossFire configuration has been specifically optimized for Intel’s Core 2 Duo processor and we got to see it in action. The third element that finishes the Boundless Gaming triangle is actually another Radeon X1600 or better being utilized as a physics processor or PPU. ATI’s physics will have support for Havok FX as well as asymmetrical configurations meaning gamers can delivery physics in a 1+1 and a 2 +1 Crossfire configuration.
    edit*

    I need to read first

    I am very impressed with the options, hopefully it performs well, I dont have any doubts though.

    Looks like X1600 Pros are $97+ while the XTs are $142+, not bad
    Last edited by vapb400; 06-05-2006 at 08:55 PM.

  6. #6
    Xtreme News Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    Posts
    2,065
    I guess the story about Ati asking for 3 PCie is true
    "There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

  7. #7
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    i didnt like the idea of buying 2 cards now 3

    plus now you'll have to pay premium for psu and mobo

  8. #8
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    3x X1900XTX at least 36-45A needed in +12v rails excluding the cpu required amps!

    maybe would be better to have a dual socket conroe board where one conroe cpu is phsyic processor ? cheaper and less power draw
    ---

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lithuania, Kaunas
    Posts
    1,313
    Why cant they just put a physics on the same PCB?

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    322
    Article demo's the 2.1 setup with CF and Physics, but they did also say you can 1.1 it so if you've already got a X1900 card, all you need is at least a X1600 to take advantage of it!

    Plus the X1600 Pro is well over half the price and the XT is only a little more and still half the price. Or for the same money you could get a X1800XL. Plus you're getting 256mb memory with them instead of the measly 128mb with the Aegia.

    You don't *have* to buy 3 cards - only if you want the best.


    CPU's:- Xeon 3060 | Q6600 G0
    Mobos:- MSI X48C (Coming!) | MSI X38 Platinum | Asus P5K Deluxe
    RAM:- Kingston HyperX PC3-14400 | Team Xtreem PC2-6400C3 | Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400 | Kingston PC2-9600
    Graphics:- PNY 9800GX2 | EVGA 8800GTX
    PSUs :- Antec TPQ-1KW | Ultra X-Pro 600w EE
    Cooling:- Nozzled FuZion | MCW60 | DDC w/ DDCT-01s | PA120.3

  11. #11
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    I can barely imagine how many watts that needs
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    So where exactly do I put my sound card? Onboard? Lol. A low-end video card (maybe with passive cooling) that not only takes care of the physics but allows for better air flow to the top video card would be nice. At a sub $100 price point I can see more people adopting the cards for games in the future. Realistically I don't see ATI worrying too much about the lack of accessibility to PCI slots since most of their users will still be using a single video card and that won't be an issue.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pamplona, SPAIN
    Posts
    1,182
    Ignore me, I didn't read the whole thread, sorry
    Last edited by mursaat; 06-06-2006 at 02:59 AM.
    i7 2600k @4500 | Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD4-B3 | Gskill 2x4096Mb 2133Mhz | 4x2TB WD Green RAID10 | OCZ Vertex3 120Gb | 2x AMD 6950 @ Stock
    Benq 24" TN | Samsung LE46C630 "2nd" Monitor | Enermax NAXN ENP850EWT | Corsair 800D Case | Corsair H60 | Logitech G9x + Wireless Solar K750

  14. #14
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    add the article about next gen vgas (dx10.0 ready) that consume a minium of 130w up to 300w, and put 3 you'll need a freaking nuclear reactor to feed them

    here is the link about power compsuntion on dx10 cards:
    http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2770
    Last edited by metro.cl; 06-06-2006 at 03:25 AM.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    /Land/Spain
    Posts
    248
    I agree, but what I don't see very clear is that in a pc we have so many slots using for a pc and then the consumption wwww ufffff.

  16. #16
    XS News
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,094
    Anyone else thinks this idea SUCKS? Where will I put my sound card? Where will I put my wireless card? SCSI card? ANYTHING PCI?
    i7-3820
    SB Z
    16GB 2200
    GTX690
    1KW Lazer

  17. #17
    XS News
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,010
    Can you think of any other solution ? I cant.
    And i really wanna use 1 PCI for sound.
    Everything extra is bad!

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    /Land/Spain
    Posts
    248
    You have the whole reason OmegaMerc; it doesn't rot to place the things, but what I see, is we will already have to sell things for that inside little all they manufactured it to small pcix.

    We will already see.

    Greetings luf1c3r

  19. #19
    XS News
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,094
    Quote Originally Posted by Ubermann
    Can you think of any other solution ? I cant.
    And i really wanna use 1 PCI for sound.
    It gets out of control, onboard is never as good as the slotted stuff unfortunantly, so you sacrifice other aspects of your pc for a priettier image? Look at the pictures on the board, there is no space for a sound blaster or similar.
    i7-3820
    SB Z
    16GB 2200
    GTX690
    1KW Lazer

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,696
    1 X1900xtx is enough for me thanks......

    dont need 2 let alone 3, wtf are they thinking?
    i have an expensive sound card i want to use, i have a tv card i want to use, where does that go?

    well, if someone has all that rendering firepower its a shame they are going to have crap sound.
    Workstation:
    3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
    4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
    Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
    Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
    Destop Audio:
    Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
    Man Cave:
    PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
    Gaming on the go:
    Alienware M18x
    i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
    2*6990 | WLED 1080P
    2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
    BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU

    2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    706
    Quote Originally Posted by OmegaMerc
    Anyone else thinks this idea SUCKS? Where will I put my sound card? Where will I put my wireless card? SCSI card? ANYTHING PCI?
    Yeah, I think it is stupid. Gimme an Agiea card any day over this. It's gonna take a lot to convince me that a card designed to do graphics, is better at physics than a card designed to do physics.
    Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?

    Think of something witty and imagine it here.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    934
    More single slot solutions needed, not this 3 double slot crap. :P

    If 2 of those cards were single slot, you could fit a sound card and something else in there.

    Personally, anything setup that won't let me have a sound card is not doable, I'd imagine a LOT of other people are in the same boat.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,780
    What I am wondering is this... for a 1 + 1 configuration do you HAVE to have a crossfire chipset/board or can you just use a board that has 2 pcie slots? I am wondering if my Ultra-D can do this with a 1900XTX in one slot and a 1600XT in the other?
    Silverstone Temjin TJ-09BW w/ Silverstone DA750
    Asus P8P67
    2600K w/ Thermalright Venomous X Black w/ Sanyo Denki San Ace 109R1212H1011
    8GB G.Skill DDR-1600 7-8-7-24
    Gigabyte GTX 460 1G
    Modded Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty w/ Klipsch Promedia 2.1
    1 X 120GB OCZ Vertex
    1 X 300GB WD Velociraptor HLFS
    1 X Hitachi 7K1000 1TB
    Pioneer DVR-216L DVD-RW
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64


    Quote Originally Posted by alexio View Post
    From the hip and aim at the kitchen if she doesn't approve your purchases. She'll know better next time.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pamplona, SPAIN
    Posts
    1,182
    ^^^ Good question, as I don't plan to upgrade until Conroe AND R600/G80 (well that's what I say now, but in secretly hide myself I'll buy a Conroe rig in July )
    i7 2600k @4500 | Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD4-B3 | Gskill 2x4096Mb 2133Mhz | 4x2TB WD Green RAID10 | OCZ Vertex3 120Gb | 2x AMD 6950 @ Stock
    Benq 24" TN | Samsung LE46C630 "2nd" Monitor | Enermax NAXN ENP850EWT | Corsair 800D Case | Corsair H60 | Logitech G9x + Wireless Solar K750

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    703
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuperman
    Yeah, I think it is stupid. Gimme an Agiea card any day over this. It's gonna take a lot to convince me that a card designed to do graphics, is better at physics than a card designed to do physics.
    Only time will tell when UT2007 and Crysis comes out. What's so hard to believe that a GPU can be used as PPU? I mean it's all about calculations, I do think a x1600 does have more processing power than the AGIEA.

    If you guys read the other article, the RD600 physics system has 2 x19s and 1 x16. And the x16 is sitting on a riser card running on a x1 PCI-E lane. There are plenty of boards today that has spare PCI-E slots, leaving you room for your PCI sound card and perhaps TV tuner. If you're the kinda guy that needs more than 2 extra PCI slot, I don't think any ATX boards will fit your need if you plan to run multi-gpu.

    With 3 x1900, that's probably an overkill for most gameplay since more "objects" in the game will only end up killing performance.

    It'd be really damn cool if they can run physics as 1.5 + 0.5 instead of 1+1 or 2+1, so you get some physics with your CF setup and won't lose much fps (or $$$).
    A wiseman once said, "If Bible proves the existence of God, then comic books prove the existence of Superheros."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •