XtremeSystems Forums

Go Back   XtremeSystems Forums > Hardware > Intel

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-31-2006, 06:59 AM   #1
rascalboy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 23
FX62 Vs Conroe E6700 at Coolaler.com

www.coolaler.com









rascalboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:11 AM   #2
C Stat B
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 326
A nice comparison, good work Coolaler.

His FX-60 PI time is weird though, My Venice @ 2.85GHz is faster.
__________________
T7600/i975Xa-YDG/TeamXtreem 667MHz 2GB/HD4670
C Stat B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:23 AM   #3
GoThr3k
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium, Dendermonde
Posts: 1,299
Ddr2 ??
GoThr3k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:28 AM   #4
PcCI2iminal
Xtreme Family
 
PcCI2iminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Republic of Hiroshima
Posts: 2,347
nice work

__________________
Mojo
Family
Biostar TP55 XE - Core i7 860(ES) @ 4.2ghz - CNPS10X Extreme - G.SKILL 1600 - Galaxy GTX275 - Velociraptor 300GB x 2 - Zippy TypeR 600w
Criminal
Biostar X58A - 920~Gulf - G.SKILL2000CL8 - GTS250 - Hitachi 40gb 7200 - Giga-EZ 1000w
Kids
P4GD1 - Pentium M 740 - XMS Xpert400 - Gladiac 7900GTX - Raptor 36GB - Aopen 560w


PcCI2iminal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:31 AM   #5
Skyline GT-R
Xtreme Member
 
Skyline GT-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 292
Send a message via MSN to Skyline GT-R
The Super PI time seems right to me, if you check this thread by OPP where he is testing a FX62. You can see he is getting 25.203s @ 3.25GHz

Nice compare Coolaler
__________________
intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 8x400MHz
Asus P5E X38 bios 1201
Corsair TWIN2X2048-6400 x2 4GB in total
eVGA Geforece 9800GTX+ || Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Adaptec AAR1430SA 4port Raid card
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 160GB 8MB SATA2 x2 (RAID0, OS drive) on Adaptec
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 250GB 8MB SATA2 x2
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB 32MB SATA2
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1000GB 32MB SATA2
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1500GB 32MB SATA2 x4
Coolermaster CM 690 || Corsair CMPSU-520HX
Windows 7 Ultimate RTM x64
Philips 200WB7ES 20" WS 1680x1050

MacBook Pro 15" June 2009
iPhone 3GS 16GB
Skyline GT-R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:35 AM   #6
Durzel
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 569
So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?

I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....

Durzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:46 AM   #7
dnottis
Xtreme Mentor
 
dnottis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Elma, NY
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durzel
So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?

I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....


Cause 3dmark 05 and 06 are primarily GPU based tests, 01 is alot of memory speed / timings and CPU overclock. Overclocking a CPU in 05 and 06 doesnt affect the overall score more than a few points.
__________________

Q9550 @ 4.105 Ghz
Gigabyte P45 UD3P F9
G.Skill PC2-8800 DDR2-1100 8GB Memory
1/2" ID Masterkleer, Swiftech MCP-655, Thermochill PA120.3 Rad, D-Tek FuZion pro mounted, FuZion GFX 2
Cooler Master UCP 1100 Watt PSU
MSI HD5870 1Ghz (1.16v), 1300Mhz
Lian Li PC V-2000
Acer X222Wbd 22" LCD
3 x WD 640GB WD6400AAKS HD


Pic of my watercooled rig
dnottis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:47 AM   #8
nCrusader
Xtreme Member
 
nCrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 264
Send a message via ICQ to nCrusader
Fair compare? A $1000 CPU overclocked against a ~$600 CPU at stock speed?
nCrusader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:51 AM   #9
Vric
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Vric's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 975
//* AMDboy troll *//

But it wasn't on AM2 with DDR2 memory.. Intel is cheating.. It's unfair...
______
Good job Coolaler.. Can't wait to get mine (23 July is too far...)
Vric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 07:54 AM   #10
idiotec
Xtreme Member
 
idiotec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 215
Is it under clocked to 2.4 in some of the tests?
__________________

What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left.
DS3 | E6400 - 3.2GHz | OCZ PLat. PC6400 | 6800GT | Zippy 460W
idiotec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 08:35 AM   #11
menlatin
Xtreme Member
 
menlatin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 587
I thought fx-62 would only be am2. fx-60 would be both.
__________________
Current 24/7 settings
Delidded L628B e6400@ 3.6ghz 1.38v
3.9ghz 1.56v dual prime, 4ghz dual 32m pi stable on water and P5B Deluxe
Patriot 667 LLK @ 970 mhz 4-4-4-4 2.3v
x1900xt 690/780
menlatin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 08:39 AM   #12
Rickster_64
Xtreme Member
 
Rickster_64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 375
Well Intel finally stepped up to bat with Conroe/Mernom. If its that good @ stock, what happens with the cascade setups and some serious clockage? I haven't bought Intel since my P3-800 that did 1.2ghz but this is gonna be total ownage and I will be switching this winter.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 4ghz
2GB PC2-6400 @ 445/890 4, 4, 4, 12
ATI HD4850 @ stock
Gigabyte P35-DS3L
El Cheapo 500w PSU with dual 12v rails
16X DVD+/- R/W
Rickster_64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 08:58 AM   #13
Fuji
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 147
Why is the FSB at 1.2 GHz as opposed to 1066 MHz? And what's up with it being at 2.4 GHz
Fuji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 08:58 AM   #14
wildcard
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 210
How overclockable are the conroe chips? Might be good to compare a maxxed out conroe vs a maxxed out FX-62
wildcard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 09:06 AM   #15
savantu
Xtreme Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildcard
How overclockable are the conroe chips? Might be good to compare a maxxed out conroe vs a maxxed out FX-62
Hahaha...LMAO

This is the joke of the day...

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=101190&page=6
savantu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 09:29 AM   #16
Getttosmurf
Xtreme Member
 
Getttosmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildcard
How overclockable are the conroe chips? Might be good to compare a maxxed out conroe vs a maxxed out FX-62
dude you missed a few threads
__________________
Q6600 | P35 DQ6 | 4x1GB Ballistix8500 | 8800GT 512 | PC P & P 750w | WC Mcp655, D-tek Fuzion, Maze 4, Bip3 |
E6600 | Abit AB9 QuadGT | 3x1GB D9GMH | 7900GTO | Silverstone Zeus 850W | Aircooled |
E2160 | Giga 965 Ds3 | 3x1GB D9HNL | 7600GS Silent |Seasonic s12 600w | Aircooled |
Getttosmurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 09:34 AM   #17
hipro5
Gulftown addicted
 
hipro5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Athens---Hellas
Posts: 5,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildcard
How overclockable are the conroe chips? Might be good to compare a maxxed out conroe vs a maxxed out FX-62
3.7 to 3.9GHz on AIR is it good?.....
__________________
INTEL PWA FOR EVER
.........


hipro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 09:39 AM   #18
realsmasher
Xtreme Member
 
realsmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
you mean 2.7
i think he was answering this question :

>> "How overclockable are the conroe chips?"
realsmasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 09:49 AM   #19
M.Beier
"HW addict"
 
M.Beier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,826
Send a message via MSN to M.Beier Send a message via Skype™ to M.Beier
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durzel
So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?

I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....

Cause X2 seem to be a bit better at multithreads - and the shared cache is also an issue when it comes to single core versus dualcore percentage performance increase..
__________________
Competition ranking;
AOCM II 2008: #2(01SE,AM3,8M), AMD-OC 2009 DK: #2(max freq), Gigabyte TweaKING 2009: #4(32M, 01SE)

Highest freq for Ras to CAS; 5(?),7 (1000,1275)



HWB hunt on gfx classics to be initialized soon!
M.Beier is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 09:51 AM   #20
iboomalot
Xtreme Addict
 
iboomalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA /okla
Posts: 1,745
superpi does seem slow

http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...3&d=1131635799

my 4400+ at 2.94 ghz is low 28s
__________________
i7 920 @4.305 ghz (205*21 HT on) Prime stable@ 1.312v (Batch# 3844A717) your results may vary
i7 920 @4.410 ghz (210*21 HT on) 1hr Prime stable@ 1.39v (Batch# 3844A717) could push more but no reason too
Enzotech Heat Killer SCW-REV.A (very nice block 73c / 79c per above voltages)
GA-EX58-UD4P (Bios ????),, 6GB- OCZ3P1600LV6GK (7-7-7-20 @1640 mhz) 1:1
XFX-5870 with Swiftech nickel block
Water Cooling - TFC X-Changer 480 and 6-Scythe SFF21E fans @1000 rpm , Vario 655
Raid 0 velociraptors 600GB,, ZM1000-HP (powerfull and silent)
Mitsubishi 22" CRT
(old school ,,no input lag , no slow response times , true color reproduction & blacker blacks) its deep but so what
iboomalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 09:55 AM   #21
hipro5
Gulftown addicted
 
hipro5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Athens---Hellas
Posts: 5,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
you mean 2.7
No I mean 3.7 - 3.9GHz ON AIR as for the Conroe CPU......AMD about 3 - 3.15GHz....
__________________
INTEL PWA FOR EVER
.........


hipro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 10:10 AM   #22
fagin
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK (Oxon)
Posts: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durzel
So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?

I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....

Because the FX62 is at 3GHz and the Conroe at 2.67GHz.... 01 and 03 benefit more from the efficient architecture. Conroe needs to be a bit higher before overtaking.......
__________________
AMD 3800 X2, DFI NF4 SLI-DR, 2 Leadtek 6800GT, OCZ 3200 Platinum LE, OCZ 600.
fagin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 10:52 AM   #23
iboomalot
Xtreme Addict
 
iboomalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA /okla
Posts: 1,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
No I mean 3.7 - 3.9GHz ON AIR as for the Conroe CPU......AMD about 3 - 3.15GHz....

i saw the 6700 at 3.7 and the 6800 at 3.8 who did the 3.9 ??
__________________
i7 920 @4.305 ghz (205*21 HT on) Prime stable@ 1.312v (Batch# 3844A717) your results may vary
i7 920 @4.410 ghz (210*21 HT on) 1hr Prime stable@ 1.39v (Batch# 3844A717) could push more but no reason too
Enzotech Heat Killer SCW-REV.A (very nice block 73c / 79c per above voltages)
GA-EX58-UD4P (Bios ????),, 6GB- OCZ3P1600LV6GK (7-7-7-20 @1640 mhz) 1:1
XFX-5870 with Swiftech nickel block
Water Cooling - TFC X-Changer 480 and 6-Scythe SFF21E fans @1000 rpm , Vario 655
Raid 0 velociraptors 600GB,, ZM1000-HP (powerfull and silent)
Mitsubishi 22" CRT
(old school ,,no input lag , no slow response times , true color reproduction & blacker blacks) its deep but so what
iboomalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 10:59 AM   #24
charlie
THE GENERAL
 
charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Field of Battle
Posts: 10,192
slaughter

1. slaugh.ter \'slo.t-*r\ n [ME, of Scand origin; akin to ON sla-tra to
slaughter; akin to OE s]leaht slaughter, sle-an to slay - more at SLAY 1:
the act of killing; specif : the butchering of livestock for mar ket 2:
destruction of human lives in battle : CARNAGE
2. slaughter \-*r-*r\ vt 1: to kill (animals) for food : BUTCHER 2a: to
kill in a bloody or violent manner : SLAY 2b: to kill in large numbers :
MASSACRE - slaugh.ter.er n

rape

NOUN: 1. The crime of forcing another person to submit to silicon acts, especially silicon intercourse. 2. The act of seizing and carrying off by force; abduction. 3. Abusive or improper treatment; violation: a rape of justice.
TRANSITIVE VERB: Inflected forms: raped, rap·ing, rapes
1. To force (another person) to submit to silicon acts, especially silicon intercourse; commit rape on. 2. To seize and carry off by force. 3. To plunder or pillage.
ETYMOLOGY: Middle English, from rapen, to rape, from Old French raper, to abduct, from Latin rapere, to seize. See rep- in Appendix I.
OTHER FORMS: raper —NOUN
__________________
xtremespeakfreely.com
charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 11:01 AM   #25
M.Beier
"HW addict"
 
M.Beier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,826
Send a message via MSN to M.Beier Send a message via Skype™ to M.Beier
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
yeah and what's not normal about this?

i hope you see the difference between 65nm tech and 90nm tech
intel would not reach it without going 65nm...

amd wil launch 3.4/3.ghz boxed air cooled cpu soon, why? 65nm
being realistic as a fan doesn't hurt
AMD will be ahead once 65nm A64 is launched, but... I actually think penryn will hit stores VERY close to AMD 65nm,... And 65nm vs. 45nm, back to the current stage.
__________________
Competition ranking;
AOCM II 2008: #2(01SE,AM3,8M), AMD-OC 2009 DK: #2(max freq), Gigabyte TweaKING 2009: #4(32M, 01SE)

Highest freq for Ras to CAS; 5(?),7 (1000,1275)



HWB hunt on gfx classics to be initialized soon!
M.Beier is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XtremeSystems