Page 9 of 18 FirstFirst ... 6789101112 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 445

Thread: EVGA NForce 680i SLI Motherboard

  1. #201
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound
    That's interesting. I don't run 3DMark anymore. I mainly test with Pi and occasionally run Orthos, just to satisfy the stability freaks.

    I just tried 400X9 linked & unlinked with memory at 533. They were virtually even again in 8M.

    I tried booting in linked mode with memory at DDR2-1200. Got the infamous long beep. I switched to unlinked mode and booted at DDR2-1280 with no problems.

    I'm testing with Corsair 6400C3 at the moment.
    I think your 400x9 testing is similar is because you are not in SYNC so that in effect you are running a 3:2 FSB:RAM divider which impacts performance. If you ran at 400x9 linked and in Sync although your memory would only be running at 400 the superpi time would not be too badly affected. Can you test that and see what you get ?

    Regards

    Andy

  2. #202
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    68
    How are you cooling the southbridge?

  3. #203
    Xtreme 3DTeam Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    309
    with a pair of 8800gtx's on the evga mb, does it matter where you put the sli connector?

    the cards have 2 connector places, one near the monitor cable and the other beside it and closer to the back of the card.

    I'v seen pictures of people using either and both?

    I am designing water blocks (full card) and I may need the space above the rear connector.

    Anyone?

    btw mcw30's fit on north and southbridges, but one screw for the sb will have to be either cut down (i'e. can't use spring and thumbknob), or in my case, I will mount the head of the screw up and relieve the case behind the mb for the spring and nut assembly (still have to cut screw a bit)


    E6600 week 28, Asus P5B vanilla, 4.64Ghz,P5B vanilla w/ Vmods, vapochill and other stuff, Super Pi 1M = 11.0000s

    QX6700 on EVGA 680i w/ twin 8800 GTX's SLI

    Second Place hwbot 3DMark06 Sli 20999 (12/2/06 till ...???)

  4. #204
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    141
    tRRD
    tRC
    tWr
    tWTR
    tREF
    setings for 500+ ram speed???

  5. #205
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    I think your 400x9 testing is similar is because you are not in SYNC so that in effect you are running a 3:2 FSB:RAM divider which impacts performance. If you ran at 400x9 linked and in Sync although your memory would only be running at 400 the superpi time would not be too badly affected. Can you test that and see what you get ?

    Regards

    Andy
    Actually I was running linked and in sync mode.

    I will post more results later. I ran 400X9 at various memory speeds and timings.

  6. #206
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    So here is a summary of my results so far, running 400X9. I won't bore you with numerous screenshots. Using Corsair 6400C3 and untweaked XP SP2.

    SuperPi 8M

    linked, sync mode, DDR2-800, 3-3-3-9
    3m 11.797s

    unlinked, DDR2-800, 3-3-3-9
    3m 12.610s

    linked, DDR2-1066, 4-4-4-9
    3m 7.657s

    unlinked, DDR2-1066, 4-4-4-9
    3m 6.906s

    unlinked, DDR2-1163, 4-4-4-9
    3m 4.766s

    unlinked, DDR2-1200, 4-4-4-9
    3m 3.531s

    unlinked, DDR-1280, 5-5-5-9
    3m 5.734s
    Last edited by sierra_bound; 11-15-2006 at 11:24 AM.

  7. #207
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    141
    sierra_bound: What tRRD, tRC, tWr, tWTR, tREF and Vmem settings for:
    unlinked, DDR2-1200, 4-4-4-9
    3m 3.531s

  8. #208
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    tRRD = Auto (4)
    tRC = Auto (31)
    tWR = Auto (6)
    tWTR = Auto (11)
    tREF = 7.8uS

    All those settings are on Auto except tREF.

  9. #209
    EVGA Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brea, California
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by rjw
    with a pair of 8800gtx's on the evga mb, does it matter where you put the sli connector?

    the cards have 2 connector places, one near the monitor cable and the other beside it and closer to the back of the card.

    I'v seen pictures of people using either and both?

    I am designing water blocks (full card) and I may need the space above the rear connector.

    Anyone?

    btw mcw30's fit on north and southbridges, but one screw for the sb will have to be either cut down (i'e. can't use spring and thumbknob), or in my case, I will mount the head of the screw up and relieve the case behind the mb for the spring and nut assembly (still have to cut screw a bit)

    You can use either position for the SLI connector.

    Also, for the southbridge I am using a Vantec Iceberq.
    . ss phase . nf11fx compressor . chilly1 evap . r507 . chilly1 condenser . freezepack controller .
    965xe 4.63ghz || evga x58 classified || 2x evga gtx 295 || 6gb g.skill 1.6ghz cl8 || corsair ssd x64 || tt 1.2kw w/ 12 awg || win7 x64

  10. #210
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,933
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound
    So here is a summary of my results so far, running 400X9. I won't bore you with numerous screenshots. Using Corsair 6400C3 and untweaked XP SP2.

    SuperPi 8M

    linked, sync mode, DDR2-800, 3-3-3-9
    3m 11.797s

    unlinked, DDR2-800, 3-3-3-9
    3m 12.610s

    linked, DDR2-1066, 4-4-4-9
    3m 7.657s

    unlinked, DDR2-1066, 4-4-4-9
    3m 6.906s

    unlinked, DDR2-1163, 4-4-4-9
    3m 4.766s

    unlinked, DDR2-1200, 4-4-4-9
    3m 3.531s

    unlinked, DDR-1280, 5-5-5-9
    3m 5.734s
    AW9D MAX



    Ill try 1066 and 1200, and I will throw my fatbodies in and try some 400 3-2-2

  11. #211
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    There is no question that 975X is faster in Pi. But your board will not hit the kind of memory speeds that a 680i will. Also, I highly doubt your board/RAM combo will do DDR2-1200 at 4-4-4. But you can always prove me wrong.

    I don't run 3DMark anymore. But I think a few people have found that 680i gets better scores than 975X in SLi mode.

    Also, your Fat Bodies don't count. They are 2X512 modules. I was using 2X1024. You need to compare apples to apples.
    Last edited by sierra_bound; 11-15-2006 at 11:53 AM.

  12. #212
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound
    Actually I was running linked and in sync mode.

    I will post more results later. I ran 400X9 at various memory speeds and timings.
    The result you gave, 400x9 at 533 Ram is not a sync mode so that is why I was confused.

    Your results above do seem to indicate that for SuperPi it does not matter much however when you put 3d into the equation then it does. I'd be interested to know how pifast behaves with linked or unlinked as that has always been more connected to 3d than Superpi.

    Regards

    Andy

  13. #213
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Athens-Greece
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Sanko
    been reading a while and just ordered one. just want to get some confirmation is it any cpu heatsink with blackplate mounting cannot be used in this evga?
    Zalman 9700 needs a little modification on the backplate.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	problem1.jpg 
Views:	362 
Size:	70.2 KB 
ID:	52946   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	solution1.jpg 
Views:	360 
Size:	60.3 KB 
ID:	52947  


    Asus Rampage IV Extreme ==> i7 4930k @4.9Ghz water-cooled (3325A911) IMC 3400+
    Asus Maximus V Gene ==> i7 3770k @4.8Ghz air-cooled (L224B652) IMC 3100+
    VTX3D 7870 Black Edition
    Avexir 2666 CL-11
    Enermax Revolution 85+

  14. #214
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    The result you gave, 400x9 at 533 Ram is not a sync mode so that is why I was confused.

    Your results above do seem to indicate that for SuperPi it does not matter much however when you put 3d into the equation then it does. I'd be interested to know how pifast behaves with linked or unlinked as that has always been more connected to 3d than Superpi.

    Regards

    Andy
    I never said 400X9 at 533 was in sync mode, did I? Personally I don't see much difference in Pi between linked and unlinked.

    This is not a great board for running Pi. But it's a fun mobo to play with.

  15. #215
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound
    I never said 400X9 at 533 was in sync mode, did I? Personally I don't see much difference in Pi between linked and unlinked.
    No you did not but if you are comparing linked to unlinked without sync mode ( which you were doing at that point) then you are comparing the same thing and it is no wonder that your results are similar.

    Regards

    Andy

  16. #216
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    I don't think you can run unlinked with sync mode. Or can you? Once I switch to unlinked mode, the memory ratio setting becomes greyed out.
    Last edited by sierra_bound; 11-15-2006 at 12:50 PM.

  17. #217
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,933
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound
    I don't think you can run unlinked with sync mode. Or can you? Once I switch to unlinked mode, the memory ratio setting becomes greyed out.
    One dimm of my new fatbodies from newegg is DOA, and it borked my windows installation....



    1066 and 1200 didnt really work...

  18. #218
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by TASOS
    Zalman 9700 needs a little modification on the backplate.
    thank you very much, guess 9700 will be in my shopping list near future, once i get my mobo. btw, still looking for alternative cause zero experience with zalman cpu cooler. only thermalright.

  19. #219
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound
    I don't think you can run unlinked with sync mode. Or can you? Once I switch to unlinked mode, the memory ratio setting becomes greyed out.
    No but you can run linked with ratio's ie linked but non sync 2:3 will give same result as an unlinked result.

    Your statement of

    "I just tried 400X9 linked & unlinked with memory at 533.They were virtually even again in 8M."

    suggests a linked non sync mode of 2:3 in actuality and not a comparison of true linked sync to unlinked.

    Obviously there is more here than meets the eye, which is to be expected with new hardware, and I think your later results are pretty spot on when it comes to Superpi, but that should not be a given across the board, especailly when it comes to 3d benching. Everyone should suck it and see.

    Regards

    Andy

  20. #220
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marseille, Fance
    Posts
    719
    So I can put the SLi Bridge in the first slots or the second slots ? but sometimes the better solution to find stability and performance is to try the both, no ?


    I have a Seasonic M12 700W, can it power my too babies 8800GTX ?


    I'll have a KF soon, is there issues beetween this CPU and the eVGa 680i SLi ?

    Is the performance gap beetween KF@333x13 and KF@266x16 ?

    My main word is : STABILTY

    What is the procedure to get new eVGA bios release and flash it ?

    Dont tel me eVGA website because there non section for nForce680i SLi for Bioses...
    Last edited by noobzed; 11-15-2006 at 02:56 PM.

  21. #221
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tujunga, Ca
    Posts
    279
    eVga is where you will find it, right where you looked...when it is released...
    When it's good it's really good...And when it's bad I go to pieces...

  22. #222
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marseille, Fance
    Posts
    719
    So, don't matter and just wait ?

    I hope the original bios is rock stable, i just want 266 or 333 fsb cause my KF is delocked so don't problem with OC by coeff

  23. #223
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Fla
    Posts
    105
    My 680I out the box gave me a higher OC than any of my 3 975X board sw/o any mods (P5wdh, p5w64ws, or my Bad AXE Note: i have an X6800) with effortless tweaking and a 13 mutly it easily gave a a 4.5+ Ghz on a mach. Basicly out of the box slapped in the processor and mach and it posted a 11.3xx in 1m. And this is in Media Center with zero tweaks Fastest i got in 1M was a 11.485 in my 975 previous boards
    EVGA 680i
    C2D X6800 @4.3
    Mach II GT
    CM2X 1024- 9136C5D X2
    BFG 8800 GTS X2 SLI
    2X 160 GB Raptors Raid-0

  24. #224
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    No but you can run linked with ratio's ie linked but non sync 2:3 will give same result as an unlinked result.

    Your statement of

    "I just tried 400X9 linked & unlinked with memory at 533.They were virtually even again in 8M."

    suggests a linked non sync mode of 2:3 in actuality and not a comparison of true linked sync to unlinked.

    Obviously there is more here than meets the eye, which is to be expected with new hardware, and I think your later results are pretty spot on when it comes to Superpi, but that should not be a given across the board, especailly when it comes to 3d benching. Everyone should suck it and see.

    Regards

    Andy
    Okay, I see your point. But again, there is virtually no difference in Pi between linked and unlinked, even when linked is running in sync mode. I will do more tests. But people who say unlinked mode is slower (at least in Pi) are wrong.

  25. #225
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montana, USA
    Posts
    503
    Is anyone else encountering a hard (synced) fsb wall at 449 on this board? I am using Corsair 6400C4s.
    i7-2600K @ 4806Mhz 102.3x47 1.368v LinX stable
    MSI P67 GD-80
    16Gb Corsair 8-8-8-24 1T 818.2Mhz
    MSI GTX560Ti 1005/2250 1.062v
    Crucial m4 256Gb SSD
    Corsair TX850 | 64bit WIN7 Pro
    Custom watercooling
    47" 1080p LCD | Onkyo 876/ Polk 5.1 surround

Page 9 of 18 FirstFirst ... 6789101112 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •