I haven't seen the motherboard myself, but got told it was without a northbridge heatsink and the chip said 975X...Originally Posted by M.Beier
I haven't seen the motherboard myself, but got told it was without a northbridge heatsink and the chip said 975X...Originally Posted by M.Beier
Then it was probaly an LGA card..
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
well now we're talkingOriginally Posted by central
![]()
Yes, that's the first Statement i heard about a i975 mobo from DFI. Here the Link (bad Google translation) to the news from DFI what they said to the People from Hardwareluxx at Cebit.Originally Posted by M.Beier
central
you should update your database in the sig....with yonahs and meroms
btw guys did any of you see what mikeguava is about to get![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
forget Yonah he's getting the next gen
![]()
besides superpi what makes yonah better to dual core AMD again? they seem to be slower clock for clock with AMD 1MB cache equivalent right?
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2648
Originally Posted by dinos22
Yea right.....Just wait and see.......!.......![]()
INTEL PWA FOR EVER
Dr. Who my arss...![]()
.........
unless the new i975X platform gives it a boost..................and hopefully no cold bugOriginally Posted by hipro5
![]()
I received mine this morning!!!
Many thanks to freecableguy, and also to PRTeamJapan/Fredyama![]()
Here in Akiba/Japan, it's expected that MSI's "945GT Speedster Plus" will be released
in next week...on 23th or so.
Release date/Availabltity of AOpen's i975mb is not clear...![]()
Maybe you have allready seen, what is possible:
T2600 3 GHz @ Aopen i975Xa: 1M 19,953 s
I think, a new age starts at SuperPi...
Hope to get the AOpen next week, but I have only a T2400 (up to now)...
Originally Posted by NEW MODEL ARMY - the attack - 1984
what's thatOriginally Posted by wwwww
damn it i want to see 32M runsOriginally Posted by stummerwinter
Up to now I didn´t saw a 32M-screenie...
Here: 2 x Prime @ 3 GHz @ 1,5 V (CPU-Z gave wrong results) with passiv cooling...![]()
The biggest problems seems to be the BIOS, very buggy...![]()
Originally Posted by NEW MODEL ARMY - the attack - 1984
Originally Posted by wwwww
DDR666 3-2-2 faints
writes down in his black book to get the Micron chips
what is buggy with the bios..................Originally Posted by stummerwinter
Theres a german guy from XS thats done quite some tests, I think he did 18.813 sek with a bit sub 3ghz, with a sucky heatsink on a i975X AOpen, and it wasnt optimised he said...Originally Posted by stummerwinter
The thing is, the CPU makes no heat, and this allows us to get like -175 loadtemps ON the CPU, instead of -120 / -140 which is normal for an FX CPU with LN2, but how it scales with cold, I do not know, but since IMC aint being used, no coldbug would appear theoreticly
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
i read somewhere that motherboards themselves were cold bugging
I find 5-2-2 @ DDR1000 much faster [that's what my 2 gigs do] (whether it can do that depends on the revision, they'll do 5-2-2, 4-4-4, 5-3-2 or 5-3-3 depending on the revision [maybe other settings but those are the only I've seen] @ the DDR1000 level).Originally Posted by dinos22
People keep telling me they're dicontinued though. bh5 of today I guess...
I know hipro is going to rip this up! I cant wait to see these results.
Main Rig: E6600, Asus Commando, Leaktek 8800GTX, X-Fi XtremeMusic, 2x Seagate 250GB 7200.10 RAID-0, Thermalright Ultra 120, HR-03+, Toughpower 1000watt.
OC Settings: 3600mhz (400x9) 2:3, 1200mhz 5-5-5-15, 650/2000 GPU, 1.4vcore, 2.3vdimm.
There seem to a lot difference between the Micron D9 fat body based memory. I've seen Corsair UL's, Mushkin XP's and the first OCZ EB's. They all seem to do 355-366MHz CAS3-2-2 @ 2,3v. The Corsair PC8000UL's I had did 480MHz CAS4-2-3-8 @2,3v (memtested for a lot of hours without error).Originally Posted by wwwww
Other memory with Micron D9 fat body like Crucial, Patriot etc seems to top at 320-340MHz CAS3-2-2 and needs to go 5-5-5 for 500MHz.
I'm not sure, but that's the picture I got with the results I've seen untill now.
Originally Posted by Salkcin
Weird, none of my Fatso's would like tRcd of 5 or tRP of 5. They wouldn't post at all. 5-4-4 to 5-2-2 worked fine though at the DDR1000 level.
There's some dude in the bandwidth section who made 400MHz 3-2-2 @ 2.4V or so...amazing!
In 4-2-3-8, which is the tRCD and which is tRP?
Actually, I have never tested my 2nd pair alone...they may be better than my first, my first wouldn't do stock speeds of 3-2-2 @ 337MHz @ 2.1V, it needed at least 2.15V to do that.
I'll try them alone when my new mobo arrives.
Dfi = 945 chipset same as asus. I really dont think the "normal" makers for enthousaist is gonna build a 975 chipset for core duo, coz this market is to small!
Thats why i think aopen and ecs are grabbing there change (and i like it).
*EDITed by IFMU*
Signature Removed by XS Staff for not following XS Policies
Forum Policies
Bookmarks