I think he has two of these monstersOriginally Posted by wyt
I think he has two of these monstersOriginally Posted by wyt
hardocpOriginally Posted by Tim
7800 GTX 512 pounces on x1800xt in every game tested. Also these are "real world" benchmarks in "real" games. Not some run of the mill synthetic benchies.
IMHO the tables have turned in a complete 180 from the geforce FX days. Hurray for competition!![]()
We'll see what happens when ATI releases an overclocked x1800XT. Someone should do a bench with the x1800XT at 130MHz on the core and 200MHz on the memory extraOriginally Posted by Tibu
. But as for that Hard review:
Originally Posted by [H
Better Average and Max FPS, and they were benched in different situations (and one was benched for a longer period).
![]()
![]()
![]()
Last edited by ahmad; 11-14-2005 at 08:18 AM.
I'm pretty sure they have set 4xAA and used Catalyst AI standard option from CCC -> this results no AA in Battlefield 2 with Radeon X1800 XT. You have to use "Let the application decide" option and set 4xAA from the game. Here are my benchmarks with Battlefield 2:Originally Posted by ahmad
![]()
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
Thanks for your numbers Sampsa. Obviously the 7800GTX 512MB is the clear winner in BF2.Originally Posted by Sampsa
Edited due to stupidity. Hey we all have moments![]()
Last edited by Tibu; 11-14-2005 at 05:04 PM.
Can you do that for us Sampsa? PleaseOriginally Posted by ahmad
![]()
Can you read? I quoted that first thing in my postOriginally Posted by Tibu
![]()
I've heard only +25 MHz for GPU and +25 MHz for memory?Originally Posted by ahmad
My source: http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=3902
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
Let's not ruin Sampsa's thread with "fanboy this or bias that", lest you are looking for a nice shining pm in your inbox the next morning...It's funny how ATi fanboys like to deliberately take out information/facts to their "benefit"
Sampsa, I think what ahmad was trying to ask is:
Based on your experience, what type of higher clocks can the XT achieve with minimal effort at stock voltages ?
Perkam
qft!Originally Posted by perkam
Gigabyte x58 UD5 / core i7 920 @ 3.8 / 6G ddr3 / 100G Patriot Inferno + 500G WD / gtx470 SLI watercooled / x-fi / 1KW enermax / 5760x1080 surround
Gigabyte z68x-ud3-b3 / core i5 2400 @ 3.6 / 8G ddr3 / 120G Intel 510 + 120G Adata S599 + 2x 1T WD blue / Zotac gt430 / x-fi / 500w ocz / 1920x1200
DFI pro875B / pressy 2.8 / 2g corsair xms pro / 6800gt agp / 150g raptor x / 500w ultra x-connect / lots of UV lighting / smiles
MSI K7N2 Delta-L / Athlon xp2600+ / 1G ocz platinum / chaintech TNT2 / 2x Diamond Monster 3D II SLI / Audigy / more smiles
I know ATI won't overclock them that much, but I am wondering how a 7800GTX 512MB would compare to an x1800XT with 130MHz/200MHz extra (just the differences between the 7800GTX 256MB and 7800GTX 512MB).Originally Posted by Sampsa
Sampsa, you have the X1800XT, the experiense and the means to clock it, do you know how much it needs to be clocked to match the 7800gtx512@stock? And how much more space for oc'ing do you belive that the 7800gtx512 has?
Playing station: DFI UT X48 T3R @ EK NB // Q6600 @ 3,2GhZ @ True (soon Dtek V1) // 280gtx (soon EK 280gtx) // 2*2GB Gskill 12800 CL7 // Corsair HX1000 // 250GB ES.2 - 160GB T166 - 2*160WD RE // Lian Li V2000B // Swiftech 240+360 - 2*DDC 1
Servers: ASUS Crosshair // X2 3800+ // 2*1GB Gskill PC6400 HZ // R3650 // IBM workstation
Laptop: Znote 4200, running on 5th year now
Bookmarks