AMD Dual-Core Toledo Socket939 CPU-Z Pciture

[matt9669]

The Italian site was previewing a 2.4GHz socket 939 DC A64 part (so they claimed)

Hmm, Opteron DC's are only slated to 2.2GHz initially - but you're right, perhaps we will see an FX-style incarnation at 1MB/core . . .

AMD has said the FX line will continue to be single core, so they would have to give it a new name it seems like . . .

[terrace215]

Hmm, Opteron DC's are only slated to 2.2GHz initially - but you're right, perhaps we will see an FX-style incarnation at 1MB/core . . .

AMD has said the FX line will continue to be single core, so they would have to give it a new name it seems like . . .

Yeah, AMD did say that... but was that before or after Intel revealed the Smithfield EE brand?

That might change their mind.

[ibby]

where can i buy 1 from ?

[Orthogonal]

Why must we be incessantly teased by these new and unreleased products.

[aCidbAbY]

nice!!!!!!! looking forward to seeing the new OC's from this hardware

[The Coolest]

How about a picture of the chip itself?
If it was dual core, windows should've recognized it as two processors, thus CPU-z should've shown more than just one CPU.
Also the 20FB1 is also weird. On 130nm, FB* CPUID would represent an s939 256KB L2 part, the Paris (physical 256KB L2). But this one has a strange BrandID, regular desktop A64s have BrandID of 4, this one has 5, it also has 512KB of L2 instead of 256KB.
Its odd. we'll have to just wait and see what that chip is.

[Cossey]

the pr rating may also give and idea of cost next to the curent single cores. the pr ratings are all high so expects costs to be higher than the top of the range single cores

[sxs112]

new update

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...4&page=1&pp=25

[furyfax]

Nice!

[The Coolest]

Ok, with this update everything makes more sense.
I'm just not sure its a Toledo. There are two types of s939 Dual Core chips, one with 1MB of L2 and the other (this one) with 512KB. One of them is Toledo, the other one is something else, I wonder which is which.
Any chance we could see a pic of the CPU itself, or at least the OPN code and stepping?

[furyfax]

I would like to see a SUPERPI test, if that is possible..

[sxs112]

I would like to see a SUPERPI test, if that is possible..

[furyfax]

Is the MP locked ?

[sxs112]

Is the MP locked ?

This TEST is with old BIOS

[ozzimark]

not sure if it's been posted anywhere else, but...

http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/Mid...glesmb/servers

Processor
Infomation Learn more



(2) AMD® 875 Opteron™ 2.2GHz, Dual Core Processors

edit: it was taken down

[actionB52]

i guess the p-rating points toward what we can expect, when multithreading is supported in comparison with a singlecore.

only my speculation.

greetings

[andyhuang0308]

My guess....A
don't ask me why I answer this....
By the way... It is really cool while working... roadnews....XD

[furyfax]

This is what I believe:
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ = 2x 2200mhz with512kb L2
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ = 2x 2200mhz with 1024kb L2
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ = 2x 2400mhz with 512kb L2
"Athlon 64 X2 5000+" = 2x 2400mhz with1024kb L2 and so on...

[karelke]

This is what I believe:
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ = 2x 2200mhz with512kb L2
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ = 2x 2200mhz with 1024kb L2
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ = 2x 2400mhz with 512kb L2
"Athlon 64 X2 5000+" = 2x 2400mhz with1024kb L2 and so on...

Maybe, or Toledo is 512kb only (and 1MB for the Opteron)

So we have 2 options here:

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ = 2x 2200mhz with 512kb L2
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ = 2x 2200mhz with 1024kb L2
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ = 2x 2400mhz with 512kb L2

(like the Sempron)

or

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ = 2x 2000mhz with 512kb L2
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ = 2x 2200mhz with 512kb L2
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ = 2x 2400mhz with 512kb L2

[The Coolest]

Actually it'll be X2 44, X2 46, X2 48, etc. Like the FX, no 00+

[Chris27]

according to this roadmap that came out today
http://www.c627627.com/AMD/Athlon64/

they have 1mb L2 per core

the 4400+ is 2ghz
the 4600+ is 2.2ghz
and the 4800+ is 2.4ghz

If the 4400+ is priced vs the pentium D at 2.8ghz @ $240 then they should be around $200 (i think) which is a really good deal considering two 3200+ venice cores would cost around $380 .

[The Coolest]

Yep, I've known about this feature for a couple of weeks now, its a real smart move by AMD, to make programs that support Intel's HT to also support multi core CPUs without any updates to the program itself, so the user benefits from having a dual core CPU, and the programmer of the said program doesn't have to rush to get a version that actually supports multi-core CPUs out to make it compatible.

[[XC] moddolicous]

Can we see a pic of the chip itself to see if it looks any different than a regular A64? U can blur out the steppings and all, I just want to see if the IHS looks any different (not sure y it would).

[andyhuang0308]

ZDA4400DAA5BV......a message comes from no where?....
ADBHE XXXXXXXX
PS:botton line: 1.30V
another roadnews...m....

[STEvil]

One dualcore is based on Venice (2x512).

The other dualcore is based on San Diego (2x1024).

Cant wait for laptops with dualcore to start showing up.....