[coolaler's result]DFI Lanparty UT NF590 SLI INTEL

**kiwi** · 08-29-2006, 03:14 AM

325

**coolaler** · 08-29-2006, 03:14 AM

encode

**coolaler** · 08-29-2006, 03:34 AM

done!

**johnsally** · 08-29-2006, 04:02 AM

300 max bios? new bios higher fsb?

**Betroz** · 08-29-2006, 04:14 AM

Hot CPU temps coolaler....82C in one of your pics!

**coolaler** · 08-29-2006, 04:17 AM

Originally Posted by Betroz

Hot CPU temps coolaler....82C in one of your pics!

Don't believe the temp,when vcore=1.28v

**Spacemaster** · 08-29-2006, 04:20 AM

Deam "mini FSB"!

**|SiLA|** · 08-29-2006, 04:24 AM

damn lovely vdimm..but how come low vcore?

more oc to come?

**Nasgul** · 08-29-2006, 04:31 AM

Is it dead yet? I know FUGGER killed one at 300fsb. And one at 265 maybe?

At 300fsb is all she wrote for this motherboard?

**johnsally** · 08-29-2006, 04:34 AM

Originally Posted by Nasgul

Is it dead yet? I know FUGGER killed one at 300fsb. And one at 265 maybe?

At 300fsb is all she wrote for this motherboard?

i hope not that would be a big disappointment, i guess its time to wait for a rd600 board

**3NZ0** · 08-29-2006, 04:37 AM

come on, higher than 300

*crossed fingers*

**Lestat** · 08-29-2006, 04:43 AM

ya know guys he is testing it the way things should be tested little by little test it, see how it compares at different levels with the other chipsets.
raise it some more.. test it more...

now.. although i agree that DFI isnt known for crappy boards. they are also known to not have a good Intel line. they have historically had troubles internally with their relationship with intel. so for them to offer more intel i think is great.

but only time will tell..... and ill be, as we all are, keeping my eyes on these threads.

**I)ickie** · 08-29-2006, 04:50 AM

1300.....
Wow,
I am really underwhelmed. FSB isnt the only thing that matters but i can't imagine anyone serious about overclocking could hack that limit.

Hopefully the RD600 is as good as promised.

I)ickie

**Ad1tya** · 08-29-2006, 05:07 AM

Hmm, guys.... did i not see something or what? I believe the "New Mem Speed" is limited to 400-> 1300 (DDR ofcourse)

If this board indeed supports indepenent memory overclocking.... then there is NO evidence that this board is limited to 325Mhz FSB. Its just limited to a max of 1300 Mhz DDR2 speeds. Which is plenty for a initial test.

Lets hope coolaler shows us a preety 500 x 8

**Langley** · 08-29-2006, 05:09 AM

Bleah this mobo are good only for the layout nothing other in my opinion...
300 Max Fsb really sux... it's a funny limit....

**Grinch** · 08-29-2006, 05:12 AM

Originally Posted by JohnMike

What's that LTD Ferquency means?!... I used to see that on AMD systems..

Huumm... Is that the multi of memory controler on the FSB?!?... Can we lower it, so that we can raise the CPU ferquency, and the FSB under 1300mhz (seems to be the limit by bios)... Those this makes sense?!?... Or i'm imagining things?!

You got it....

example:

200x5=1000
200x4=800

etc...etc...1-5 is ldt multiplier

**tuoho** · 08-29-2006, 05:25 AM

Looks like pretty good so far! Hopefully OC will look as good as board

**_Eduard_** · 08-29-2006, 05:28 AM

The board looks so sweet, but damn what a major setback it doesn't clock good. Believe me, if it could do 500FSB, DFI would've had it in even its earliest BIOS release.

**celerity** · 08-29-2006, 05:36 AM

this board sucks.. dfi... you broke my heart

**Yoxxy** · 08-29-2006, 05:52 AM

Seems as if the board sucks. INTC should work with Nvidia to make a good chipset now that AMDTI has been formed. They are going to need a good third party. Obviously Nvidia has not quite realized how to make a high clocking northbridge for fsb.

**Frank M** · 08-29-2006, 05:58 AM

Originally Posted by goldenfrag

Hmm, guys.... did i not see something or what? I believe the "New Mem Speed" is limited to 400-> 1300 (DDR ofcourse)

This: http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/DF...LIINTEL/19.JPG
"new FSB Speed (QDR) - 790-1300 => max fsb = 325.

Originally Posted by _Eduard_

The board looks so sweet, but damn what a major setback it doesn't clock good. Believe me, if it could do 500FSB, DFI would've had it in even its earliest BIOS release.

I agree. If it would be stable at higher speeds, they wouldn't limit it so low.

Originally Posted by celerity

this board sucks.. dfi... you broke my heart

IMO it's nvidia that broke your heart.
This is just a revised nf4 chip. How long has nf4 been around? nvidia is getting lazy.

**JohnMike** · 08-29-2006, 06:10 AM

Originally Posted by Grinch

You got it....

example:

200x5=1000
200x4=800

etc...etc...1-5 is ldt multiplier

Yes, and i think that everybody is missing that... I think that the LDT Multiplier is our "missing door" to go higher on the CPU and RAM.

After reading TonyOCZ article about Intel's chipset and knowing that Conroe sets 1066 Strap, 267mhz is the nominal valor of FSB, let's see...

267x4=1068(1066)
267x3=801(800)
267x2=534(533)
.....
267x5=1335(1333) -> X6800EE

I have a E6600 that can reach 400 (400x4=1600mhz) FSB x9 = 3600mhz

Now if that LTD Multiplier is what i imagine... Let's see:

400 (400x3=1200mhz) FSB x9 = 3600mhz
or
400 (400x2=800mhz) FSB x9 = 3600mhz

Those anyone see what i see?!...

Coolaler...Show us the "Big Apple"..

**n-sanity** · 08-29-2006, 06:12 AM

Lets hope ur onto something there.

**Silver Bullet** · 08-29-2006, 06:19 AM

If it's only going to go to 300FSB .. it be an all show no go mobo . and coming from DFI that be sad...

**JohnMike** · 08-29-2006, 06:29 AM

Originally Posted by Silver Bullet

If it's only going to go to 300FSB .. it be an all show no go mobo . and coming from DFI that be sad...

If that LDT Multiplier is for the memory controler on the FSB, it means that you still can lower the multiplier and push the FSB above 300mhz...

300x5=1500(wall on NF590?!)

300x3=900 (lower FSB) x9 = 2700mhz, means you can 500x3=1500 x9 = 4500mhz!!

Do i make any sense?!?

Thread: [coolaler's result]DFI Lanparty UT NF590 SLI INTEL

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions