MMM
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 53

Thread: Am I gonna kill my venice?

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
    How do you guys know if 1.7v is deadly for 90nm Winchester/Venice? I've never run my Winchester @ below 1.7v, even on air. That 54C in SmallFFT is OK, so I would keep it If you can get better temps by changing cooler, than do it. If not, keep it as it is.
    Agreed: Ever since I got my DFI I have been running my winchester at 1.7v on an XP-90C. Honestly I could care less if the thing died on me, but if i was running a $1,000 proc I might be a tad more worried.With my winchester I see a max of 48C or so under small FFT, while my venice pushed ~54C under 1.7v with the same cooler. Interestingly though my Venice only held out for 5 days vefore I got the 4 LED prob ( I had been priming my venice 24/7 at 1.7v ~2.67ghz ). However I also noticed that one of the XP-120 fan mounting clips somehow got on the board right before the 4 LED happend, so most likely it wasn't the voltage that killed it, just a short.

  2. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    349
    Just to let you guys know:

    I'm 99% certain I fried my venice with 1.72 volts (1.7 actual).

    I'd been running it for ages @ 1.65 actual and it was getting better and better. I decided to push it again and went up to 1.72 volts in the BIOS.

    Save and exit and computer just turns off.

    OK, turn it on again. It starts for a split second, then powers down.

    Anyway, long story short, new CPU arrived today and I'm up and running again.

    I'll test the old chip again later to be sure.

    Real bummer 'cos this new chip sucks so far. I managed 2.9 Ghz Prime stable on the old one (now RIP). This new one is struggling to hit 2.6 Ghz

    Oh temps were always good 'cos I have an excellent watercooling rig.

    Highest I saw them go was 48'C, but that was with the chip putting out 160 watts.

    :: 3DMark01=66,732 :: 03=71,879 :: 05=26,413 :: 06=18,772 ::

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    370
    so would you guys consider 1.6v safe for a venice?

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    332
    yep

  5. #30
    xtreme energy
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Europe, Latvia
    Posts
    4,145
    Quote Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
    @mesyn191

    eeehhhhhh I stopped reading those 1.5yrs ago, when I gave 2.2v to my AXP-M 2500 and had it 24/7 @ 2.1vcore. Everybody around was saying that > 1.85v on air = DEAD!!! I still have that CPU, in my everyday/work NF2 @ 2690Mhz / 2.1vcore

    Of course, it's all truth. It will die one day, but question is WHEN!
    Actually I killed one xp-m when I gave it 2.3V. No problem with 2.1V however.
    ...

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    476
    All you guys need is max 1.5 years of life for a CPU. After that period it is pretty much outdated and worthless for top/mid gamers... My lame Winchester is at 1.66 Volts on Xp-90 with TT silent Cat fan and i've seen it as high as 57 degrees in the hottest days but it is working. Bought it like 9 months ago.
    Last edited by TurboDiv; 06-14-2005 at 10:49 AM.
    i9 9900K/1080 Ti

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    449
    well ive run my XP2400+ at 2,1V air cooled for around 1 year... it's starting to crap out now. but i mean, that's to be expected.

  8. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by TurboDiv
    All you guys need is max 1.5 years of life for a CPU. After that period it is pretty much outdated and worthless for top/mid gamers... My lame Winchester is at 1.66 Volts on Xp-90 with TT silent Cat fan and i've seen it as high as 57 degrees in the hottest days but it is working. Bought it like 9 months ago.
    The A64 came out more than 1.5 years ago.. Is there any A64 that is "worthless for top/mid gamers" when overclocked?... In the past year and a half all we've done is gone up 200 mhz and added dual channel.... The Clawhammer 754's still kick rather hard in any desktop!

  9. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo Mahoney

    I'll test the old chip again later to be sure.
    Yup, it's dead.

    :: 3DMark01=66,732 :: 03=71,879 :: 05=26,413 :: 06=18,772 ::

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by mesyn191
    http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cf...WT122199000000

    "Excessive supply voltages overstress the transistors and can lead to damage due to charge injection from the hot electron effect or damage to the ultra thin gate oxide dielectric from excessive electric field strength. Even if the stress is insufficient to lead to an immediate catastrophic failure, the accumulation of low levels of damage can lead to a drastically shortened device lifetime."

    Its a ooold article but all the info. is still dead on.
    Out of curiosity, how does one determine what "excessive" is?

    The problem here is excesive is a relative term.

  11. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    349
    I personally find that components have a tolerance of +20%.

    I would say more than 20% over spec is execessive.

    1.4 x 120% = 1.68v

    Therefore, I was definately using excessive voltage.

    :: 3DMark01=66,732 :: 03=71,879 :: 05=26,413 :: 06=18,772 ::

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    379
    Well I turned over a new leaf with my ram. So I'm running 304x9 ram @DDR498 1.5-2-2-6 3.2v

    And its more stable then the 2800 (alot cooler too )

  13. #38
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    153
    Yes, prepare your post the the "Sudden venice death syndrome" thread now.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    370
    ITE smart guardian and CPU-Z says my CPU is at 1.58V, and I have it set to 126%x1.3 in BIOS.

    Should I expect my CPU to last more then 2 years?

  15. #40
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    Man I hated my XP1700 Tbred so much, I put 2.4v through it on air. Didnt kill it though, ran 2.2v 24/7 to get 2.3ghz. I had bios options up to like 2.65v I think.

    If you can replace your chip no probs, then I would run 1.7v 24/7. If it was a FX55 or something I would probly turn it down =P I cant remember the last time I heard of a chip dying from too much voltage over time, usually just OC a little worse

  16. #41
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by Rezag1000
    ITE smart guardian and CPU-Z says my CPU is at 1.58V, and I have it set to 126%x1.3 in BIOS.

    Should I expect my CPU to last more then 2 years?
    anyone?

  17. #42
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by Rezag1000
    anyone?
    ull be fine

  18. #43
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    936
    I'm planning to run my sandy at 1.75, heh. alrdy tested it, it won't die. Maybe I'll even pump 1.8 into it, grin, if it dies, oh well, I'll just get an x2. I think your fine at 1.7 as long as your temps stay down. The best trick is better cooling.
    ALIENS are bringing my next kentsfield based rig in a UFO case!

  19. #44
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    532
    Everybodies guessing. AMD never told us "safe" values for A64's in their white papers like they did with socket A chips so technically you're risking anything above 1.4 volts.

    I am persoally comfortable 10% over stock Vcore.. dunno why..just a nice number...10. Who knows maybe able to hang with 2.2Vcore like bartons could???

  20. #45
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    349
    Just be careful guys - I just mesasured my Vcore using a multimeter on my DFI Ultra D.

    Software says 1.648

    Multimeter says 'uh uh' - 1.73

    :: 3DMark01=66,732 :: 03=71,879 :: 05=26,413 :: 06=18,772 ::

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    332
    How did you measure ? PM-me

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    370
    yeah, I have been trying to figure out how to measure Vcore with a multimeter for ages!!

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    166
    Don't PM, post in the thread so everybody else with a DFI nF4 know where to measure
    [DFI nF4 Ultra-D @ 6/15 BIOS] // [Venice 3000+ @ 2.8GHz @ 1.472v] // [2x512MB SP BH-5 @ 2-2-2-8 200 MHz 2.63v... for the moment] // [Sapphire X800XL Ultimate] // [OCZ Powerstream 520W]
    Super PI 1M record: 29.969 // Suicide screen record: 3 GHz // LBBLE 0517 DPMW batch ~300 on air // Stable enough?
    TB 900 + Venice 2800 folding 24/7, TB 1200 folding whenever it's on, profile

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rutgers
    Posts
    465
    You guys should also keep in mind that as the process gets smaller more of the wattage is lost through leakage, so while 1.7v might sound like a lot for 90 nm a lot of the extra power may just be leaking through the processor and not doing any actual work, im not certain if this is true or not but leakage definitely increases. So basically what im trying to say is while increased voltage will def kill the processor eventually, it may be that with a smaller process as long as the die is kept cool, the increase in voltage may not be as significant as it was on older larger process processors. If i am just talking out of my ass let me know.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    151
    You'll be fine. Just keep below 60 and you really dont have anything to worry about. These things can do above 70-80C really.

    Hehe a friend of mine had his A XP reboot with this loud popping sound once, and he found out it was running over 100C for a few minutes. Really weird, but his survived and still hits 2.7 just fine.
    AMD Athlon 64 3000+ NewCastle @ 2450mhz (245x10)
    OCZ PC3200 Platinum (2x256) @ 225mhz 2-3-2-5 [retired]
    Corsair PC3200 TwinX (2x512) @ 245mhz 2-3-3-10
    Seagate 250GB 7200.8 SATA
    Soltek SL-K8AN2E-GR - nF3 250
    Antec Neopower 500W
    ATI Radeon 9800Pro

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •