Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 52

Thread: P4GPL-X + Dothan OC problems

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie
    Please give more details!!!! You're the only one we "know" running this configuration, give us all the details and tweaks!!
    I bet you're on an IDE HDD right??

    C

    I don't use any tweaks, if you want to reach an high fsb, you only have to set the PCIe frequency higher than 120 MHz.

    For example:

    PCIe = 123 --> 2,2*123 = 270
    so you can get a fsb of 270 MHz, if you use a pcie clock of 123 MHz.

    The PCIe clock does only overloads the HDD ( if you use an IDE HDD on the Onboard Controller) and the Northbridge. If you consider the formula ( 2,2*PCIe = FSB), there is no problem with your graphic card. You can also select an higher PCIe clock, but it have to be higher than FSB/2,2.
    With a Vchip at 1,6V you can reach a PCIe clock about 220 to 230 MHz. For Higher PCIe clocks, you have to do a Vchip mod to 1,9V.

    I use a Promise PCI SATA RAID Controller with 4x WD 250 GB and Vchip at 1,6V, so i can reach a FSB of 290 with no problems.


    here is my result in 3dmark 2001:



    P-M @ 3150 MHz + 7800 GTX @ stock

    the 7800 GTX isn't the best performer at 3dmark 2001, a x850 XT PE should reach 40-42k easily.
    Last edited by albertwesker; 07-04-2005 at 11:11 PM.

  2. #27
    THE ORIGINAL OC JEDI
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Field of Battle
    Posts
    8,973
    Quote Originally Posted by albertwesker
    I don't use any tweaks, if you want to reach an high fsb, you only have to set the PCIe frequency higher than 120 MHz.

    For example:

    PCIe = 123 --> 2,2*123 = 270
    so you can get a fsb of 270 MHz, if you use a pcie clock of 123 MHz.

    The PCIe clock does only overloads the HDD ( if you use an IDE HDD on the Onboard Controller) and the Northbridge. If you consider the formula ( 2,2*PCIe = FSB), there is no problem with your graphic card. You can also select an higher PCIe clock, but it have to be higher than FSB/2,2.
    With a Vchip at 1,6V you can reach a PCIe clock about 220 to 230 MHz. For Higher PCIe clocks, you have to do a Vchip mod to 1,9V.

    I use a Promise PCI SATA RAID Controller with 4x WD 250 GB and Vchip at 1,6V, so i can reach a FSB of 290 with no problems.


    here is my result in 3dmark 2001:



    P-M @ 3150 MHz + 7800 GTX @ stock

    the 7800 GTX isn't the best performer at 3dmark 2001, a x850 XT PE should reach 40-42k easily.

    OUTSTANDING!!!!



    have you tried a P4GD1 also?? Great results... will a standard IDE HDD work without the additional PCI card??

    C

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie
    OUTSTANDING!!!!



    have you tried a P4GD1 also?? Great results... will a standard IDE HDD work without the additional PCI card??

    C
    i haven't tried a P4GD1, because i couldn't buy this board in germany. The P4GD1 has got the same layout as the P4GPL-X, but it has got 4 ram slots, so you can select the same settings, which i posted.

    If you want to reach a high PCIe clock, you have to use a PCI Controller for your HDD's, otherwise the HDD's wouldn't give a signal, if the PCIe clock is higher than 110-113 MHz.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    cairns > australia (ex-germany)
    Posts
    775
    Quote Originally Posted by Nazu
    Only problem is that there is none SLI PM mobos there so dream on But great idea non the less
    really think so? then take *this*







    (c) images by ocworkbench.com

    that may be an option some time soon.. who knows. then we may be running
    a cpu on a board that it wasn't ever designed to run on - thanks to an
    adaptor (ct-479) - and then we might even be able to run 2 pci-e cards in sli-
    mode on that same board - again not designed to run like that - using yet
    another adaptor....
    now that would be something. hail the adaptor-manufacturers... given the
    muscle the dothans have already shown, we might see some very very good
    stuff (scores) based on this - some day...soon...



    @ albertwesker, you don't happen to be dukee from hwl?
    sky / s!p - we are oldskool, dammit.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Manchester, Uk
    Posts
    211
    Thats possible the greatest sight i've ever seen

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    151
    yes, i am dukee from hwlxx

  7. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by sky
    really think so? then take *this*







    (c) images by ocworkbench.com

    that may be an option some time soon.. who knows. then we may be running
    a cpu on a board that it wasn't ever designed to run on - thanks to an
    adaptor (ct-479) - and then we might even be able to run 2 pci-e cards in sli-
    mode on that same board - again not designed to run like that - using yet
    another adaptor....
    now that would be something. hail the adaptor-manufacturers... given the
    muscle the dothans have already shown, we might see some very very good
    stuff (scores) based on this - some day...soon...



    @ albertwesker, you don't happen to be dukee from hwl?
    wtf? thats crazy ....adapter-o-rama.

  8. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    draussen vom Walde komme ich her
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by sky
    try using this formula to calculate the necessary pcie frequency:

    pcie x 2.2 = fsb

    so if you want an fsb of ~225 mhz you should try somewhere around 102 mhz pcie
    - maybe try 100-104 mhz, whatever works (best)

    Doesn't work....

    All over FSB215 (215,5 real) is NOT stable.
    ram async, more voltage..... all tried....


    Should I get another PCI/PCIe clock with setting PCI to (e.g.) 104 or higher?

    FSB215,5 PCIe100 -> PCIe 107,73 (clockgen)
    FSB215,5 PCIe105 -> PCIe 107,73
    FSB215,5 PCIe95 -> PCIe 107,73



    OK.... I will try it now with IDE-HDD, PCI-raid-HDD and Jumper@400 instead of 533.

  9. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    draussen vom Walde komme ich her
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by ^don.k's^
    What FSB is set in the CT 479? I get better fsb with jumpers in fsb400 than fsb533.

    BINGO !!!
    I love you.

    More FSB is now possible...

  10. #35
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie
    OUTSTANDING!!!!
    have you tried a P4GD1 also?? Great results... will a standard IDE HDD work without the additional PCI card??
    I have used onboard ICH6 PATA on the P4GD1 up to 138MHz PCI-E and 295MHz FSB. Used a Western Digital WD1200JB (120 GB).

    There is also an PCI PATA RAID controller integrated on the P4GD1.

    Look at key features.
    Satan: Opteron 165 - TT Big Typhoon - DFI Lanparty NF4 SLI-DR - OCZ EB PC3500 2x512MB - Asus Radeon X800 XT - Raptor 74GB x2 RAID0
    Slepbar (Lenovo 0761): Pentium M 735 (Celeron M 380 @ 2,13GHz) - DDR2 2x512MB - GMA 900
    3DMark2001: 40392 - Super PI: 23s

  11. #36
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    216
    Well seems Dothan on pci-e is looking better and better, my 730 is arriving on the 8th and adapter and board on the 11th, so I have three days for flashing bios 1006.001 XD

    To get high FSB speeds FSB400 jumper is the way to go then?

    PD:Wondering if a 750 would have been better due to higher multi. The 730 has 12 multi but which has 750? 13,5?

  12. #37
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    cairns > australia (ex-germany)
    Posts
    775
    Quote Originally Posted by Always
    PD:Wondering if a 750 would have been better due to higher multi. The 730 has 12 multi but which has 750? 13,5?
    the 760 has 15x default, so i guess a 750 has 14x (14x133=1866, about right)
    iirc intel doesn't offer .5x multipliers
    sky / s!p - we are oldskool, dammit.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    126
    m730 = 12
    m740 = 13
    m750 = 14
    m760 = 15
    m770 = 16
    No 0.5x options



    how could i get them multipliers wrong !
    Last edited by Jericho; 07-07-2005 at 03:57 PM. Reason: fixed multiplier for m750 to 14x

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by Always
    Well seems Dothan on pci-e is looking better and better, my 730 is arriving on the 8th and adapter and board on the 11th, so I have three days for flashing bios 1006.001 XD

    To get high FSB speeds FSB400 jumper is the way to go then?

    PD:Wondering if a 750 would have been better due to higher multi. The 730 has 12 multi but which has 750? 13,5?
    i took the FSB533 MHz jumper and i can run a FSB of 290 MHz with no problems.

    the P-M 750 has got the multi 14

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    805
    Quote Originally Posted by albertwesker
    i took the FSB533 MHz jumper and i can run a FSB of 290 MHz with no problems.

    the P-M 750 has got the multi 14
    just clarification, so you set it to 100Mhz jumper? Sorry if this sound a repeat question, but I just want to be absolutely sure because mine is arriving real soon.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by death metal
    just clarification, so you set it to 100Mhz jumper? Sorry if this sound a repeat question, but I just want to be absolutely sure because mine is arriving real soon.
    i set it to 533 MHz (133 MHz)

  17. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    draussen vom Walde komme ich her
    Posts
    29
    I definitely get higher FSB at 100/400 Mhz jumper.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by HITAC
    I definitely get higher FSB at 100/400 Mhz jumper.
    Made no difference for me

  19. #44
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    805
    Hehehe, ok. Thanks guys, so maybe it'll work, and maybe it wont'. I gues I just have to try =)

  20. #45
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    532
    nice work

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    151
    the P4GPL-X works great with the 7800 GTX

    now aquamark with 287 MHz FSB


  22. #47
    THE ORIGINAL OC JEDI
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Field of Battle
    Posts
    8,973
    Quote Originally Posted by albertwesker
    the P4GPL-X works great with the 7800 GTX

    now aquamark with 287 MHz FSB
    GREAT work!!!!

    C

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    244
    So with this board you can change the cpu multiplier? The p4gd1 does not allow you to change the multiplier? What is the deal with that? He is running a 750 with a 12 multiplier.
    i7 920...Intel DX58SO
    12gb Patriot Viper Xtreme
    Palit GTX 560 ti 2gb SLI
    Antec Quattro 1000...Twelve Hundred Case
    Intel X25-M 80gb x 4 Raid 0...Hitachi 7K3000 2tb
    Sony GDM-FW900...Z-5500...X-Fi Forte

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    310
    Albert,

    What kind of cooling are you using? Lets see some pics of your rig!

    And it does appear you can change multi with the P4GPL-X. Wish I could find that MB around here.

  25. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    49
    @16floz...
    EIST from www.cpuid.com lets you change the multi in windows...


    980X/RAMPAGEII/HD5970/X-25M/6GB Corsair/Panzerbox/1200w Powercache
    E8600/DG45FC/Chenbro Mini-ITX Server/4x1.5TB
    Q9550S/Zotac 9300-Wifi/X-25M/Skeleton

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •