i see no point other than OCZ satisfying their customers' whining complaints. again like i always argue, tcc5 based ocz is still good. my tccd pc4800 wont clock higher than my tcc5 based pc5000. if ocz continues to bin it themselves and guarantee the high speeds, theres no difference. its the same as selling utt pc4000 and utt pc3200. you're guaranteed the speeds. if ocz bins tcc5 at pc4800 and guarantees that speed, why would anyone want to pay an extra $40 per kit just to be guaranteed tccd? i have a crapload of tccd with me. a lot of them wont even do what my pc5000 tcc5 can do. should i start complaining that tccd isnt as great as everyone thinks it is? and those sticks include, corsair pc3200xl v1.2 (tccd with bp), adata pc4800 (tccd with bp), and centon advanced pc3200ll (tccd with bp). none of them can really reach pc5000 2.5-4-3-7 stable.

only reason i would vote yes is so that you can get whiners off ocz's back.