3700 San Diego vs. 3200 Venice: Round 2!

[xwoodoo]

I'm still waiting to see 27's @ 2.8

hard to say man ... but with some tweaks never knows...
I grabbed 2 SD 3700+ ADA3700 DAA5BN CAABGE 0516WPAW
here is a brief results
guess i was lucky this time too
by the way i just run 3DK2001SE both Venice&SanDiego .
clearly SanDiego outperforms venice(same frequence&config) by at least 1k in 3DK2001SE

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=19706

[FLDQUY157]

3D01 was known to respond best for larger L2 cache so dunno?!

I support this because I have seen this before my eyes.

I got a technically faulty AXP-M that only has 64KB L2 cache enabled. When I ran 3d01 I only got around 16000 on a 6800GT at 2400MHz on the same setup I got about 20000 from another AXP-M.

that was basically aboutt 3000 - 4000 marks different.

[XTCgr]

my results mates...ok,everything is in greek but the language of numbers is universal i guess!
http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?...217#post243217

well my results show exactly the opposite, san diego is faster than venice in same frequency