MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 126

Thread: Tref values

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    455
    if you look at the table
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    1552= 100mhz(?.?us)
    2064= 133mhz(?.?us)
    2592= 166mhz(?.?us)
    3120= 200mhz(?.?us)(my sweat spot w/ Bh-6 at 250+mhz , your mileage may vary)
    ---------------------
    3632= 100mhz(?.?us)
    4128= 133mhz(?.?us)
    4672= 166mhz(?.?us)
    0064= 200mhz(?.?us)
    ---------------------
    0776= 100mhz(?.?us)
    1032= 133mhz(?.?us)
    1296= 166mhz(?.?us)
    1560= 200mhz(?.?us)
    ---------------------
    1816= 100mhz(?.?us)
    2064= 133mhz(?.?us)
    2336= 166mhz(?.?us)
    0032= 200mhz(?.?us)
    ---------------------
    0388= 100mhz(15.6us)
    0516= 133mhz(15.6us)
    0648= 166mhz(15.6us)
    0780= 200mhz(15.6us)
    ---------------------
    0908= 100mhz(7.8us)
    1032= 133mhz(7.8us)
    1168= 166mhz(7.8us)
    0016= 200mhz(7.8us)
    ---------------------
    1536= 100mhz(3.9us)
    2048= 133mhz(3.9us)
    2560= 166mhz(3.9us)
    3072= 200mhz(3.9us)
    ---------------------
    3684= 100mhz(1.95us)
    4196= 133mhz(1.95us)
    4708= 166mhz(1.95us)
    0128= 200mhz(1.95us)
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    you see that the formula

    uS x FSB does NOT always apply.

    check the table for yourself.

    3.9 x 100 = 390 - table says 1536

    ALSO...the other BIG question.....yes indeed we dont even know if we NEED to change the TREF...if the TREF has to be increased if we go higher with the HTT/FSB

    At this point i THINK all this theory here is pure speculation - the only definitive answer we could get from someone at Samsung or someone who really KNOWS what the values mean in the bios and what they're supposed to be.

    Maybe even Oscar just follows specs without being able to tell what's the optimum for certain speeds etc.

    THEN....of course the odd values (0016 etc.) which are totally non-logical..and AFAIK 0016 also does not work and you get freezes instantly. Wonder if those values are just plain wrong.
    Q6600 g0 L741 1.4V@35xx-> 8x44x FSB - 5:6 333/800- 2x2gb OCZ XTC Plats@53x mhz - dfi lp X38 TR2, Ultra Xtreme 120 - W7 64Bit - NV GTX275 - Corsair 520 (blew up) -> Toughpower 750W

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    349
    I think the table is wrong.

    It has just been formulated based on what a piece of software interprets the refresh rate to be.

    :: 3DMark01=66,732 :: 03=71,879 :: 05=26,413 :: 06=18,772 ::

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •