Wow I'm gonna try this now!
Okay in simple terms:
Everest refresh rate*FSB = Tref cycles
i.e.
7.8*200 = 1560
7.8*300 = 2457
I'm gonna try it and report back tomorrow.....![]()
Wow I'm gonna try this now!
Okay in simple terms:
Everest refresh rate*FSB = Tref cycles
i.e.
7.8*200 = 1560
7.8*300 = 2457
I'm gonna try it and report back tomorrow.....![]()
Venice 3500 + XP-90C+Panaflo M @ 301x9 | DFI LANParty UT nF4 Ultra-D 618-2 | Powercolor X850XT + Arctic Silencer 5 Rev2 | OCZ Plat. Rev2 TCC5 2x512 + Thermaltake RAMsinks w/ Zalman Bracket+Fan | 2x RAID 0 SATA Seagate 7200.7 | Audigy 2 ZS | Fortron Blue Storm 500 | Lian-Li PC-7A
Okay, let me see if I understood it correct. So, if my FSB/HTT is 250, it'll then be 250*7.8=1950, and the closet TREF values to that without going over is: 2064(133Mhz-15.6us&1.95us). That's it? I still don't get. Man, am I so dumb or what?!!!I just don't get how these numbers/values work.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Asus Rampage II Gene, Xeon W3550 D0 Mushkin PC3-2000 6GB, BFG 9600GT OC 512MB DDR3
Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe 1.01G, AMD A64 4000+, 2x1GB Ultra PC-3200, EVGA 7600GT 256MB DDR3
Asus MA378-T with AMD Athlon 64 X2 7850
ECS 945GCT-M/1333 v3.0, Intel Celeron E1400, MSI 8500GT 256MB DDR3
BIOStar P4M900-M7 Rev. 7.0, Intel Celeron 440, 1GB Kingston, 6600LE
Gigabyte M61PME-S2P with AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660, EVGA 8500GT 1GB DDR2
So thats the formula we use? We find the refresh rate in Everest and then just multiply that by the FSB/HTT speed to get the TREF value we should use?Originally Posted by Jomiy
noOriginally Posted by burningrave101
lookup your HTT/Mem speed in the table. (or take a value close)
I looked it up in the table and came up with the same TREF value i got calculating my refresh rate times HTT speed.Originally Posted by Jaco
I'm running 280Mhz with OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev2 and the refresh rate in Everest is 7.8 us so 7.8 x 280 = 2184 and the next highest TREF value from that is 2336.
I'll try it out later and see if it helps stability any. Right now i'm not stable running 1:1 at 280Mhz 1T with this stupid Venice core. My Venice will overclock to 2.8Ghz+ but its memory controller seems crappy.
I'll share a few of my questions and thoughts on this.
First 1.95us, 3.9us, 7.8us, 15.6us is it that if these are lower the memory will run more stable?????????
Does memory size effect this setting???????
How does command rate affect tref??????
Also I believe once you figure out the refresh time you want to run at you complete this equation [refresh time in us]/[1/fsb] and then select what ever tref is closest to that number.
Last edited by yasoumalaka; 01-21-2006 at 10:07 AM.
University of Florida Graduate 2005
CPU: Q6600 @ 3.55Ghz @ 1.52v bios lapped
MEM: Crucial Lan Fest 2x 1GB DDR2 1185 @ 2.275v
MOBO: IP35 PRO Hacked W/ heat pipes modded using MX-2
PSU: 600W POWERSTREAM
GPU: 8800GTS 602/908
COOLING: Thermalright Ultra Xtreme - Lapped - 2x 12CM S-flex
Thermal Interface: MX-2
Case: Cooler Master CM-690 5x 12CM Fans
OS: Vista, XP, Ubuntu
What do you think???? Is this right?
University of Florida Graduate 2005
CPU: Q6600 @ 3.55Ghz @ 1.52v bios lapped
MEM: Crucial Lan Fest 2x 1GB DDR2 1185 @ 2.275v
MOBO: IP35 PRO Hacked W/ heat pipes modded using MX-2
PSU: 600W POWERSTREAM
GPU: 8800GTS 602/908
COOLING: Thermalright Ultra Xtreme - Lapped - 2x 12CM S-flex
Thermal Interface: MX-2
Case: Cooler Master CM-690 5x 12CM Fans
OS: Vista, XP, Ubuntu
Bookmarks