MMM
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: Intel quietly adds DRM to new chips

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    York, PA
    Posts
    263

    Intel quietly adds DRM to new chips

    Microsoft and the entertainment industry's holy grail of controlling copyright through the motherboard has moved a step closer with Intel Corp. now embedding digital rights management within in its latest dual-core processor Pentium D and accompanying 945 chipset.

    Officially launched worldwide on the May 26, the new offerings come DRM-enabled and will, at least in theory, allow copyright holders to prevent unauthorized copying and distribution of copyrighted materials from the motherboard rather than through the operating system as is currently the case.

    While Intel steered clear of mentioning the new DRM technology at its Australian launch of the new products, Intel's Australian technical manager Graham Tucker publicly confirmed Microsoft-flavored DRM technology will be a feature of Pentium D and 945.

    "[The] 945g [chipset] supports DRM, it helps implement Microsoft's DRM ... but it supports DRM looking forward," Tucker said, adding the DRM technology would not be able to be applied retrospectively to media or files that did not interoperate with the new technology.

    However, Tucker ducked questions regarding technical details of how embedded DRM would work saying it was not in the interests of his company to spell out how the technology in the interests of security.

    The situation presents an interesting dilemma for IT security managers as they may now be beholden to hardware-embedded security over which they have little say, information or control.

    Conversely, Intel is heavily promoting what it calls "active management technology" (AMT) in the new chips as a major plus for system administrators and enterprise IT. Understood to be a sub-operating system residing in the chip's firmware, AMT will allow administrators to both monitor or control individual machines independent of an operating system.

    Additionally, AMT also features what Intel calls "IDE redirection" which will allow administrators to remotely enable, disable or format or configure individual drives and reload operating systems and software from remote locations, again independent of operating systems. Both AMT and IDE control are enabled by a new network interface controller.

    "We all know our [operating system] friends don't crash that often, but it does happen," Tucker said.

    Intel's reticence to speak publicly about what lies under the hood of its latest firmware technology has also prompted calls to come clean from IT security experts, including Queensland University of Technology's assistant dean for strategy and innovation, IT faculty, Bill Caelli.

    "It's a dual use technology. It's got uses and misuses. Intel has to answer what guarantees it is prepared to give that home users are safe from hackers. Not maybes, guarantees".

    Caelli said it was "critical Intel comes clean" about how the current DRM technology is embedded into the new CPU and chipset offering.

    Microsoft was unavailable for comment at press time.

    Digit Staff
    http://www.digitmag.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=4915

    Now everyone will get an AMD

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    63
    I know I will Be getting a AMD
    Primary Rig


    Manufacturer: GOZ
    Processor: Q9550 @ 4.0GHz cooled by H2O
    Mobo: GIGABYTE EP45-UD3P
    Memory: 8gig Kinston Hyper X 1066
    Hard Drive: 2x 74gig Raptors in Raid 0/WD 640
    Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
    Monitor: BenQ FP202W
    Sound Card: Creative XTreme Gamer X-Fi
    Speakers/Headphones: Logitech Z-5500 5.1/PS3 HeadSet
    Keyboard: Razer Lycosa
    Mouse: Razer Death Adder
    Mouse Surface: Razor DESTRUCTOR
    Windows 7 Pro 64bit


    Cooled by

    MC-TDX
    D5
    HWlabs 240GTX
    and a crap load of yates

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    At least until AMD implements Presidio and adds support for DRM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    waukegan
    Posts
    3,607
    what is this DRM???
    mobo: strix b350f
    gpu: rx580 1366/2000
    cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
    ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
    psu: coarsair 1kw
    hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    285
    Digital Rights Management- Bad news.
    God of all that is SFF.

    SFFclub.com

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    239
    What's Presidio?
    Can DRM be disabled? Does intel benefit from DRM?
    Mobo: MSI P35 platinum
    CPU:e8400
    Mem: 4x512mb Patriot fatbody
    Vid Card: 8800gts 512mb
    Cooling: Thermalright 120 ultra
    HD's: 80x2 raid and 320gb
    Case: cooler master cm690

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    96
    any confirmation of this news? i was thinking greatly about the Pentium D... now i don´t know what to think of it :P
    Silverstone FT01|Odin GT 800|SH5 V2
    I7 920|TRUE|X58-UD5|Corsair Dominator 1600
    XFX GTX260BE|LG 245P|G9|X6|Corepad

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by ukveld
    any confirmation of this news? i was thinking greatly about the Pentium D... now i don´t know what to think of it :P
    i don't think there is really any software that supports it yet, so it won't matter for you

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    York, PA
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by totensiebush
    i don't think there is really any software that supports it yet, so it won't matter for you
    The way it is implemented, I dont believe it needs any specific software for it to work.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    397
    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ NewCastle @ 240 x 10 = 2400 MHz @ 1.550 V
    MSI K8N Neo Platinum 1.52 Beta BIOS
    2x 512 MB DDR500 A-DATA Vitesta Hynix @ 240 MHz 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 1T 2.85V 24/7
    Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro R350
    Enermax EG365AX-VE FMA 3.3V@32A 5V@32A 12V@26A
    DVD-RW TEAC
    Seagate 200 GB SATA + Maxtor 300 GB SATA

  11. #11
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    Oh please, Intel can't stop piracy with this crappy technology. Me and some buddies are already working on DRM-breaking code. I'll get my hands on this chipset/CPU asap and see if my code actually works. I've already placed my bet that other programmers are working on it too. I wonder when Intel will implement TCPA. Hopefully AMD won't follow Intel's Microsoft/MPAA/etc etc-loving attitude. Intel screwed up big this time.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    134
    Additionally, AMT also features what Intel calls "IDE redirection" which will allow administrators to remotely enable, disable or format or configure individual drives and reload operating systems and software from remote locations, again independent of operating systems. Both AMT and IDE control are enabled by a new network interface controller.
    The DRM does not worry me at all, however the above quote does. This is gonna be a hackers best dream come true. This is a none-issue for End Users but for large firms and the business-sector, this could be a problem.
    Never Argue With An Idiot. They'll Lower You To Their Level And Then Beat You With Experience!

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by Pressure
    The DRM does not worry me at all, however the above quote does. This is gonna be a hackers best dream come true. This is a none-issue for End Users but for large firms and the business-sector, this could be a problem.
    Agreed big prob there
    Primary Rig


    Manufacturer: GOZ
    Processor: Q9550 @ 4.0GHz cooled by H2O
    Mobo: GIGABYTE EP45-UD3P
    Memory: 8gig Kinston Hyper X 1066
    Hard Drive: 2x 74gig Raptors in Raid 0/WD 640
    Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
    Monitor: BenQ FP202W
    Sound Card: Creative XTreme Gamer X-Fi
    Speakers/Headphones: Logitech Z-5500 5.1/PS3 HeadSet
    Keyboard: Razer Lycosa
    Mouse: Razer Death Adder
    Mouse Surface: Razor DESTRUCTOR
    Windows 7 Pro 64bit


    Cooled by

    MC-TDX
    D5
    HWlabs 240GTX
    and a crap load of yates

  14. #14
    Bulletproof
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Shun low, K?
    Posts
    2,553
    Good for you MoP. Hope you get it working.
    Only the stupidest humans believe that the dogma of relative filth is a defense.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland OH USA Bored?: You Know It
    Posts
    2,892
    the more news i read the more i hate intel, i cant wait till i can build my new rig and get me a diego or venice. in the end, pirates will alwasy find a way around things though.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    397
    not very good dual core, and now this ... go away intel !
    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ NewCastle @ 240 x 10 = 2400 MHz @ 1.550 V
    MSI K8N Neo Platinum 1.52 Beta BIOS
    2x 512 MB DDR500 A-DATA Vitesta Hynix @ 240 MHz 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 1T 2.85V 24/7
    Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro R350
    Enermax EG365AX-VE FMA 3.3V@32A 5V@32A 12V@26A
    DVD-RW TEAC
    Seagate 200 GB SATA + Maxtor 300 GB SATA

  17. #17
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    woops, there went my thoughts of playing with some intel hardware... until further notice.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  18. #18
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    if DRM is indeed in the CPU itself, then I indeed know what hardware I won't be bothering with in the future.
    with all this privacy crap snooping into my hardware and OS, and games, I am already sick of it... when I can put my own CD, into my own CD drive, copy it to my own computer, then have a big "CANNOT TRANSFER" sign pop up, when I try to put my own CD onto my own Ipod... then I get pissed.
    thats when it's just going to far.
    they are trying to control every single thing you do with your stuff.
    pretty soon I won't be suprised if they sell stereos that stop working after 9 PM, and computers, that require a blood sample before they turn on...

    after all, wasn't MS trying to do this exact same thing with thier "Palladium" thing in the Longhorn OS??




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  19. #19
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    The answer is: don't use Intel's new CPU/Chipset, and use Linux. Go completely against the Wintel specification. M$ will be out of business, and so will Intel. No more DRM.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by masterofpuppets
    The answer is: don't use Intel's new CPU/Chipset, and use Linux. Go completely against the Wintel specification. M$ will be out of business, and so will Intel. No more DRM.
    Unfortunately Wintel is quite a big monster and you canâ€:banana: slay it just liek that. Becides we have to many lazy people around on earth, since they find Linux to be a crapy thing, wich it isnt! And they're lazy because they cannot spend couple hours in order to be able to configure it . You know what I tell them, you try configuring Windows 3.1 or older .

  21. #21
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    I've already converted at least 100 people I know to the Linux side, and alot of them to AMD Now, a copy of Windows XP Pro costs what, £200? 200 * 100 = a £20,000 loss to Microsoft. That's not really significant to a corporation with a few hundred BILLION dollars, but it's a start!

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    311
    go mop stick it to the man, the only thing keeping me on windows is games, if game developers made more games esp popular ones for linux i'd drop windows so quick

  23. #23
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    Pff, loads of games can be ran on Linux natively. And don't you go telling me they suck, because I can say that Quake 3, Return to Castle Wolfenstein and Doom 3 DO NOT suck. Plus, if you pay £1 a month, you can get Cedega/WinEX and play Half-Life 2, Half-Life 1, Far Cry, and loads of other games at nearly native speeds.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by masterofpuppets
    The answer is: don't use Intel's new CPU/Chipset, and use Linux. Go completely against the Wintel specification. M$ will be out of business, and so will Intel. No more DRM.
    Grandma can't install linux neither can 95% of the population which pretty much precludes any kind of real user or support base. No im afriad MS and intel is here to stay and stay dominate. The stuffs free and they can't give it away (linux). Did people switch with intel's unique precessor IDs? With MS writting your ID's into every DOC they make? DRM will be the same.
    Last edited by Zebo; 05-31-2005 at 03:35 AM.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    245
    Might be a noob question but can you get around this by not using a third-party pci or pci-e network card?

    Q9550 E0
    Abit IP-35 Pro | 4x1gb Ballistix DDR2-800
    74gb Raptor |750gb Samsung | Seasonic S12-500
    EVGA 8800GT SSC | 23" HP L2335 | 20" Samsung 204B
    X-Fi Fatal1ty FPS | Logitech Z-2300 THX 2.1 and Speed-link Medusa 5.1 | Logitech MX1000, G7, G15 and Extreme 3D Pro

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •