Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 105

Thread: black viper regestry patch

  1. #51
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    In india, not indian
    Posts
    29
    just a warning guys, if you want to disable services manually use "services.msc" not msconfig.....Black Viper said this in big bold letters on his guide

  2. #52
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    InDaRimbOE
    Posts
    309
    http://users.skynet.be/MesjogemeH/SafeProAllstart.zip (don't remember what this one does)
    http://users.skynet.be/MesjogemeH/SuperTProAllstart.zip (disables pretty much everything, also has pagefiledisable tweak and sets everyting to "performance", maybe more)
    http://users.skynet.be/MesjogemeH/DefaultProAll.zip (this is a no-brainer )
    http://users.skynet.be/MesjogemeH/GamingProAllstart.zip (for gamers = mildly tweaked)

    PS: tweaks are for win xp pro sp1

    PPS: use at your own risk!! They may bork your OS
    Last edited by kristos; 05-01-2005 at 08:52 AM.
    Halt On : No Errors

    My cup is half full, yours is emtpy... now THAT's optimism

    horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae: A64 FX OC record on Dry Ice by Jort, kristos, troid, C_X and "Moortgat"

    Originally posted by lazyman
    You are in trouble only if you admit it. Intel is never in trouble.

  3. #53
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by kev182
    just a warning guys, if you want to disable services manually use "services.msc" not msconfig.....Black Viper said this in big bold letters on his guide
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...242#post835242




    Kristos, as always, it's advisable to refrain from the use of automatic patches, because every system is different. What works for one system might entirely #&*% up another.

    And after that happens, what dependencies does the user have to rely on?

  4. #54
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    3095.au
    Posts
    85
    Personally i prefer to do all this stuff manually.
    Shame blkviper's site has been down so long, but here's a guide which is just as good. Just remember to play it safe and use a little common sense when disabling the "risky" services

    Following that, i managed to get my 24/7 config down to 17 services.
    XP x64 boots virtually instantly now
    Currently Tweaking ..
    ::
    DFI nf4 Ultra-D R.AD0 w/704-2BTA BiOS ::
    CACJE 0603 FPMW Opteron 146 ::
    2x 1GB Mushkin xp 4000 UCCC ::
    GeCube x1900XTX ::
    ::
    12,993 ::

  5. #55
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    It has been so long and you guys still haven't found those patches?
    Here you go then All three for Windows XP. Have fun!
    Attached Files Attached Files

  6. #56
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    InDaRimbOE
    Posts
    309
    Quote Originally Posted by teqguy
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...242#post835242




    Kristos, as always, it's advisable to refrain from the use of automatic patches, because every system is different. What works for one system might entirely #&*% up another.

    And after that happens, what dependencies does the user have to rely on?
    uhm, these aren't mine, these are blackvipers patches wich I still had on my computer and since so many were asking for them, I just uploaded them to my webspace...

    i figured since this is XS, people would know the risks of using patches or anything else that might bork your system... but I'll add a note in my previous post...
    Last edited by kristos; 05-01-2005 at 08:51 AM.
    Halt On : No Errors

    My cup is half full, yours is emtpy... now THAT's optimism

    horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae: A64 FX OC record on Dry Ice by Jort, kristos, troid, C_X and "Moortgat"

    Originally posted by lazyman
    You are in trouble only if you admit it. Intel is never in trouble.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Crazy Belgium
    Posts
    213
    Like I said allready a load of times before, nothing easier then using WinLite to strip your Windows install.

    I decreased my 600MB installCD to 95MB

    When I format my HDD, zeven minutes later I'm allready benchin'

    Takes 60MB of ram on the desktop (9 threads)
    Be cool, be watercool!

    from Belgium, #1 Beer-country in the world!

    SuperPI && Pifast scores

  8. #58
    color red illidan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,485
    Quote Originally Posted by ZMarre
    Like I said allready a load of times before, nothing easier then using WinLite to strip your Windows install.

    I decreased my 600MB installCD to 95MB

    When I format my HDD, zeven minutes later I'm allready benchin'

    Takes 60MB of ram on the desktop (9 threads)
    Can u show us a screen capture with Task Manager

  9. #59
    100% Load 24/7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,495
    Quote Originally Posted by Troman
    this is junk
    i had to reinstal windows god damn't...
    blackviper my ass
    Great comment
    I have had this happen too. I am not a believer in these patches. Dealing with services manually is the only way to go.
    Main Rig
    i7 2600k l Asus P8P67 l 2x2gb Gskill l GTS450 l Venomous X l XClio 680

  10. #60
    Xtreme Addict -100C Club
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Mechelen(belgium)
    Posts
    1,652
    used nlite to make a tweaked winxp proff with sp2

    now i got this problem
    while installing ati drivers "wxp-w2k-catalyst-CCC-8-121-050322a-022141C-english"
    Setup can not start installing-engine.
    The RPC-server is not available

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	atiproblem.JPG 
Views:	3179 
Size:	55.1 KB 
ID:	29596  
    Last edited by Jort; 05-01-2005 at 01:17 PM.
    Back in the phase change world

  11. #61
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Saskatoon Sk. Canada
    Posts
    86
    I don't use XP but it sounds like you have the "server", "rpc" and or "Workstation" service disabled. One thing you can't disable is the rpc stuff, it must be on automatic(except rpc locator can be manual). rpc is a key component of windows. Enable it in the administrator tools. As well, as always, look at your log files in Event Viewer.

  12. #62
    Xtreme X.I.P. MaxxxRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, Ca USA
    Posts
    12,551
    Jort i got issues disabling things with nLite... u have to be careful i went through like 5 disks before i got one that was good...

  13. #63
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by isp
    Does anyone know if it's possible to do diagnostic reboot with win2k like for XP? If not is there atleast a 2k patch to kill all those unneeded services? Damn I don't wanna go through and do it one by one...
    By 'diagnostic reboot' you mean safemode ? if so just tap F8 on startup like everyother windows OS

  14. #64
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    3095.au
    Posts
    85

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Jort
    used nlite to make a tweaked winxp proff with sp2

    now i got this problem
    while installing ati drivers "wxp-w2k-catalyst-CCC-8-121-050322a-022141C-english"

    Run services.msc
    Scroll down to the Remote Procedure Call (RPC)
    Makre sure it's set to start automatically, and is running.

    You won't t need to restart.
    Currently Tweaking ..
    ::
    DFI nf4 Ultra-D R.AD0 w/704-2BTA BiOS ::
    CACJE 0603 FPMW Opteron 146 ::
    2x 1GB Mushkin xp 4000 UCCC ::
    GeCube x1900XTX ::
    ::
    12,993 ::

  15. #65
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Crazy Belgium
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by illidan
    Can u show us a screen capture with Task Manager
    U asked for it

    Here ya go:



    Although I have to admit this is with explorer killed. Explorer takes 10MB.

    Just WinLite install
    Be cool, be watercool!

    from Belgium, #1 Beer-country in the world!

    SuperPI && Pifast scores

  16. #66
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    261
    I don't know if anyone is going to be able to beat this:



    (no, I didn't cheat, I just used the FlushWindows tool I posted before )

    Oh... and it doesn't stay like this, Windows bloats itself up about 30 seconds after you run it. However, you can create a batch that's hidden and runs in a continuous loop if neccessary.

  17. #67
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Crazy Belgium
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by teqguy
    I don't know if anyone is going to be able to beat this:
    Ehm dude... I just did Just look the post above you

    Oh... and it doesn't stay like this, Windows bloats itself up about 30 seconds after you run it. However, you can create a batch that's hidden and runs in a continuous loop if neccessary.
    Lol, mine screenshot is taken after half an hour of windows-use

    //EDIT/ ah ok now I see

    I was looking at the 105MB on the bottom of the window. Now I noticed the usage in the section itself.

    Hmmz, but that is maybe still aaah liettle chieting no? (heck, system idle proces N/A )
    Last edited by ZMarre; 05-04-2005 at 09:23 AM.
    Be cool, be watercool!

    from Belgium, #1 Beer-country in the world!

    SuperPI && Pifast scores

  18. #68
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by ZMarre
    Hmmz, but that is maybe still aaah liettle chieting no? (heck, system idle proces N/A )
    System Idle Process is just above kernel level, so it doesn't need prioritization.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Helsinki / Finland
    Posts
    965
    Whitch patch do I need for SuperPi8M and HexusPi etc. etc.
    It comes to my bench hard drive but no 3D

    I have WinXP Pro Corp with all Windows UpDates
    A64 with nF4 DFI

    Please, find me the fastest patch
    - Team Skootterit
    - SuperPi32M : 18m53.156s with FX-57 / LN2 (Ilkkahy's brazed container)
    - SuperPi8M : 3m55.703s with FX-57 / LN2 (Ilkkahy's brazed container)
    - SuperPi1M : 21.484s with FX-57 / LN2 (Ilkkahy's brazed container)


  20. #70
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    261
    Those patches will either disable too much or not enough, because they aren't specific to your system.

    So, in order to find a happy medium, you should do it manually using services.msc.

    The configuration I use disables everything but 5 services, two of which are required, the other 3 being DNS Client, Windows Audio, and Windows Image Aquisition.

    Here's the post I made earlier that outlines the minimum required services to not only boot Windows, but keep it functional:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...186#post835186

  21. #71
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    657
    There is no reason to disable services at all. Especially for performance since there are no performance gains...

  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by KoolDrew
    There is no reason to disable services at all. Especially for performance since there are no performance gains...
    If you do the math, you'll find that you free almost 30MB of ram used by unneccessary services that perform arbitrary functions nobody really needs. Not to mention, it reduces boot times.

    If you have between 20 and 30MB of ram going to useless services, guess what? That's 20-30MB ram that you don't have for use somewhere else.

    So, just because you didn't notice an improvement in performance from it, doesn't mean it didn't help functionality. Applications appreciate having more available resources, and nothing you could possibly say can dispute that.


    Anyone who says differently probably has an antivirus suite like Norton running in the background, sucking up 45MB of ram to do what could be done in 5MB.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Crazy Belgium
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by KoolDrew
    There is no reason to disable services at all. Especially for performance since there are no performance gains...
    Haha, my rig is about ten times faster now. And I don't mean innoticable SuperPI times with that, but pure handling
    Be cool, be watercool!

    from Belgium, #1 Beer-country in the world!

    SuperPI && Pifast scores

  24. #74
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by teqguy
    If you do the math, you'll find that you free almost 30MB of ram used by unneccessary services that perform arbitrary functions nobody really needs. Not to mention, it reduces boot times.

    If you have between 20 and 30MB of ram going to useless services, guess what? That's 20-30MB ram that you don't have for use somewhere else.

    So, just because you didn't notice an improvement in performance from it, doesn't mean it didn't help functionality. Applications appreciate having more available resources, and nothing you could possibly say can dispute that.

    Anyone who says differently probably has an antivirus suite like Norton running in the background, sucking up 45MB of ram to do what could be done in 5MB.
    Ok. The only thing you may benefit from is decreased boot times, but with enough RAM which all of you probably have there is no benefit. If the memory is needed for something else the memory used by that particular service will be next to nothing or none at all.

    The point is that the NT kernel doesn't give scarce resources to things that don't request it. For example an ODBC service might take up lots of CPU and RAM and I/O on a busy transaction server, but if somehow it is enabled on your home PC it will remain idle and fully paged out. If the service is non-idle then you definitely don't want to disable it.

    Also you can't even reclaim the amount of memory that the non-pageable ones take as it is part of the non-paged pool, and that's reserved for the kernel anyway. Stopping the services gives you no more memory for applications and no reduction in the OS's overheads.

    Anyone who says differently probably has no idea how Windows manages memory at all. If the service is not in use it won't use any recources anyway and if it is in use you definitely don't want to disable it.

    Haha, my rig is about ten times faster now. And I don't mean innoticable SuperPI times with that, but pure handling
    It's called the placebo effect. There are no real world performance gains and I am glad Black vipers site is down as all he has done is convince people disabling services actually helps performance.
    Last edited by KoolDrew; 05-13-2005 at 10:03 AM.

  25. #75
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Crazy Belgium
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by KoolDrew
    It's called the placebo effect. There are no real world performance gains and I am glad Black vipers site is down as all he has done is convince people disabling services actually helps performance.
    Errr dude what do you think I am? A ten-year old boy?

    If I tell you that I have a clean windowsinstall and a clean winlite install, and the winlite is much faster then the normal one, then it is like that ok? I did it, you didn't. So no point of wanting to be the I-know-it-better-then-you guy. ('betweter' in dutch, dunno how to say it correctly in english)

    Remember, none of this is about RAM-usage. It is about disabled stuff. Heck, you can even feel the difference if you simply turn off all Themes, transluency, fading menus etc.

    Damn, if I want to go to desktop properties (rightmouse click on desktop) I can't even follow with my mouse. And I'm clan-gamer ET, so my aim is quite good

    Everything just draws waaay faster. Period.
    Be cool, be watercool!

    from Belgium, #1 Beer-country in the world!

    SuperPI && Pifast scores

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •