3GHz stable on wc is good
better than a FX-55 0.13
3GHz stable on wc is good
better than a FX-55 0.13
I love XS
Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications
I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92
When you guys get a chance while testing that 3700+, can you run Prime95 Blend for even 2hrs? I'm just wondering how far down it will be needed to go to get that kind of stability? Will 2900MHz happen?
Like, I can do flip-flops in and slightly above 3GHz area with Winie but Prime95 stability stops @ 2.86GHz, two hours at least
Thanks
1.55 is the highest vcore to have an increase with is 3700+Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
When you guys get a chance while testing that 3700+, can you run Prime95 Blend for even 2hrs? I'm just wondering how far down it will be needed to go to get that kind of stability? Will 2900MHz happen?
Like, I can do flip-flops in and slightly above 3GHz area with Winie but Prime95 stability stops @ 2.86GHz, two hours at least
Thanks
Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications
I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92
At 1.7v I bet that chip would easily hit 3.4Ghz on a single stage. Thanks for the review Misteroadster.
Less is more.
I know a guy who will have a 4000+ .09 tomorrow
but he'll test on brutal WC
Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications
I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92
but the 3700+ dont take 1.7vAt 1.7v I bet that chip would easily hit 3.4Ghz on a single stage. Thanks for the review Misteroadster.
perhaps another yup
perhaps another nop
Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications
I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92
Nice quick results. Looking forward to the comparison.
i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
Dang! Nice results! :drool:
For sure , those results aren't revolutionnary, but don't forget they're better than the results given by a 1000$ chips.
This one will cost approximatively 350$, imagine what the FX57 will have to give to be the king
This 3700+ could be any FX55 0.09 without any doubt.
Last edited by misteroadster; 04-21-2005 at 11:04 AM.
Oh. I didn't know the voltage tolerance had changed so much from the Winchester core.
Less is more.
Even with the new smileys (for the worse of course), I don't find a smiley that drools over 2 pages
Very very nice. If the price is indeed around the $350 in DK, I think I know where my pay check is going. Goodbye Wacken Open Air!
In short, both AMD and NVIDIA discovered that their next-generation graphics cards are superior to each others' last-generation graphics cards.
Yes , this chips performs and overclocks a little better than my FX55 !!
Same improvements than Newcastle->Winchesters.
Better in superpi, CpuMark, Games ....Everywhere; not a huge but better.
All i can say is "FX55 owners, you can sell yours babies now, it will be hard soon"
Mine is already sold
Hehe I already sold mine too
It's me
Waterchiller will maybe OK this Week end too
tomorrow cuz I must do a choice between a 3700+ and 4000+ before saturdayIt's me
Waterchiller will maybe OK this Week end too
Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications
I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92
Tolerance is about the same.Oh. I didn't know the voltage tolerance had changed so much from the Winchester core.
-San diego 0505EPMW
-My winnie 0448SPAW
Default SD vcore is 1.35V max benchable 1.55-56V= +0.2v
Default Winnies Vcore is 1.40 max benchable 1.60-61V= +0.2v
I have an 0448SMPW , so funny : increasing vcore is useless (+0.1Max =30Mhz lol) in aircooling but 2720 Rock Prime 1.4v
Last edited by misteroadster; 04-21-2005 at 11:50 AM.
bloody awesome... me wants 2 of these heheFor sure , those results aren't revolutionnary, but don't forget they're better than the results given by a 1000$ chips.
This one will cost approximatively 350$, imagine what the FX57 will have to give to be the king
This 3700+ could be any FX55 0.09 without any doubt.
---
For $350, it's nice... and my 0448 FX went 3006mHz 3D stable on AIR with 15C ambient... so to me, 31xx on water is good, but not "breathtaking". Now, the FX57, the first FX on the 90nM platform, I expect to be a ROCKET. Either way, I have a 4000+ pre-ordered so I'll be able to play.
C
Time to pre-order myself a 3700+
I thought the FX-57 share the same core as these San Diego no? if they are then I doubt the FX-57 would be that much(if any) better OC'er than the 3700 SD? But still...if 2.9 or 3.0 can be done on air then I still think it's mucho nice! infact, 700~800mhz gain is excellent! sure beat paying $1000 for the FX-57
Nice work there misterroadster... thanks for sharing
Remember Charlie, thats only one 3700+ they might clocked worse or better who knows. We would just have to see.
Im tempted by the San Deigo's but it would only be to buy a 4000+ or higher
looks sweet, to bad its still out of my price range!!
"each driver release plays whack-a-mole with a few more annoyances" -inq
I say compare the numbers on the 3700+ to the numbers from my Venice (now Bennah's) 3800+. I haven't got a chance to look through the link, but from what's being said here, it looks as if they're very similar in OC'd performance....
well its the extra 200mhz vs. the extra 512kb cache...
So what's the impact in terms of performance/benchmarks?
Interesting results, thanks for sharing
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks